The Hills Have Eyes (2006) (R, 2006)

common sense media says

Grim remake of '70s slasher film. Not for kids.


parents & educators say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this film is absolutely not for kids. It includes incessant, vicious attacks on a family traveling through the New Mexican desert by a group of mutants. The violence is startling, explicit, and aggressive (dogs are knifed and eviscerated; humans suffer knifing, dismembering, shooting, burning at a stake). Someone bites off a parakeet's head. The monstrous mutants watch their prey through binoculars, which the film renders as spooky "surveillance" imagery. Women appear undressed as monsters try to rape them. Characters smoke, drink beer and margaritas, and refer to "the chronic"/pot. Opening credits sequence features ghastly victims of radiation, in jars and photos.

Positive messages: Mutants are mad; bumbling humans are dumb; only the enraged, vengeful young father triumphs.
Violence: Bloody, grotesque assaults on traveling family by human mutants; infant in danger (carried off by mutants); dogs yelp off screen and their bloody bodies are discovered by horrified humans; mutants eat human and dog corpses; bird's head bitten off; graphic injuries and body parts (including a bloody head and some deformed heads).Repulsive rape of a young mother, plus repeated sexualized violence.
Sex: Sexualized violence.
Language: Frequent profanity, including repeated use of f-words, s-word, "-of-a-bitch."
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Characters smoke, drink, and show effects of radiation (deformities and cannibalism).

More on The Hills Have Eyes (2006)

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about the film's two family units: How do the travelers/victims turn desperate and become like their attackers? How do the film's graphic displays of violence (now a staple of horror/slasher movies) serve specific functions? Do viewers want to be scared or repulsed, to identify with victims or monsters, or to take pleasure in the technical expertise of the violence? Why do horror movies remain so popular, especially with teens?

What's the story?

What's the story?
Gruesome and then some, the new HILLS HAVE EYES again pits two families against one another. In one corner of the New Mexico desert traipse the Carters, including retired cop Big Bob (Ted Levine), his churchy wife Ethel (Kathleen Quinlan) and their mostly grown kids, new mom Lynn (Vinessa Shaw) and her liberal-leaning husband Doug (Aaron Stanford), adolescent Bobby (Dan Byrd), and slightly younger Brenda (Emilie de Ravin). In the hills, a family of mutants watches the Carters, until it's time to strike. Their faces are doughy and misshapen, bodies bent and filthy, and snaggly-sharp teeth perfect for ripping flesh from bones. First, they kill one of the Carters' two German shepherds, leaving it for young Bobby to find. He's so scared that when he makes his way back to the broken down trailer where the rest of the family awaits a never-coming rescue, he doesn't tell them what he found, concerned he might scare them. This is only one of many bad ideas made by the California-bound vacationers (the first is to take the "shortcut" directions down an unpaved road).

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
Alexandre Aja's revisitation of Wes Craven's 1977 original is true to its source, making the same basic social and political points with about as much subtlety. (In 1945, the U.S. military irradiated miners during atomic testing, and the victims' kin remained fond of eating people.) Most of the mutants are men, which explain their kids, including a little girl in a red hood. She provides an emotional and ethical counterpoint to her elders, though she's more mascot than complicated character.

The mutants descend on the hapless travelers in veritable droves. Aja and DP Maxime Alexandre's mobile, precise camerawork creates a perverse elegance, even as the film exploits ugliness and abuse. While Craven and his peers conjured nightmares in the wake of the Vietnam war, this new generation of slasher aficionados and makers is working amid mass mediated torture, war, and moral mayhem. No wonder their visions are bleak.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: Fox Searchlight
Director: Alexandre Aja
Cast: Aaron Stanford, Emilie de Ravin, Ted Levine
Genre: Horror
Run time: 105 minutes
Theatrical release: March 10, 2006
DVD release: June 20, 2006
MPAA Rating: R
MPAA explanation: strong gruesome violence and terror throughout, and for language.

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 
 

Review It

 

Review The Hills Have Eyes (2006)





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

12

Most useful reviews by all members

moveeluvvr666
teen, 16 years old
 
OMG...SOOO DISGUSTING!!!
I am 12...my mom finally let me watch this...i loved it and really hated it at the same time...a girl gets raped...the crazy mutants steal babies...one man almost dies about 6 times...so many sharp objects to the head...moms and dads...dont let kids under 13 into the room!!!

ghostfacekilla
teen, 16 years old
 
it was good
if u like scary movies u will like this it is a littie gore but it is good

Ms. Understood
kid, 13 years old
 
Good movie, good message,... I liked it!
The whole rape and muder was diturbing and unneccicary but if you think about the message you'll realize the movie's not half bad! The strong-willed father encounters many hardships and enemies along the way, shortly after a majority of his family dies, including his wife, while looking for his kidnapped daughter... Also, the mutant-girl in the red hoody turns out to be good,... she saves the baby, has to kill her brother and herself to save this man and -what's left of- his family. Good ending.

Hamzah 312
teen, 14 years old
 
watch horror movie with your parents
I think this movie is off 8 and iffy for 12-15 it is a very voilent movie many jump scenes

TheSuperman765
teen, 16 years old
 
i rate ths title OFF for ages 16+
What to watch out for * Messages: Mutants are mad; bumbling humans are dumb; only the enraged, vengeful young father triumphs. * Violence: Bloody, grotesque assaults on traveling family by human mutants; infant in danger (carried off by mutants); dogs yelp off screen and their bloody bodies are discovered by horrified humans; mutants eat human and dog corpses; bird's head bitten off; graphic injuries and body parts (including a bloody head and some deformed heads).Repulsive rape of a young mother, plus repeated sexualized violence. * Sex: Sexualized violence. * Language: Frequent profanity, including repeated use of f-words, s-word, "-of-a-bi-ch." * Consumerism: Not an issue. * Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Characters smoke, drink, and show effects of radiation (deformities and cannibalism).

 
Great Movie, Off For Some Adults
Brutal, bloody, disturbing, and violent. It depends on the kid and how mature they are. This is something that could possibly happen out in N.M. where they test this stuff. They've found messed up animals out there that were extra violent, why not humans?

 
this movie is sick, gross, and disturbing. Noone, and i mean NOONE should see this. If someone enjoys it, they need help

IronZombie75
teen, 16 years old
 
I just saw this movie. Great horror flick!! Warning to parents: This movie is absolutely insanely gory and brutal (mostly in the final half of the movie) Mutated man get foot stabbed by a screwdriver, then gets a mini flagpole through his neck, and then finally, an axe straight into his skull. Also many other scenes of brutal and gory violence. Also contains some language and in the unrated version, a mutant rapes a girl. Also don't watch if you are an animal lover.

DanAus
teen, 18 years old
 
NO
Disturbing and violent

SHARK
teen, 15 years old
 
Holy (swear)
I saw the Commercial and almost Threw up

Plague
parent
 
The Hills Have Eyes
WARNING SPOILER: No one in this movie truley triumphs, everyone dies (as said in the 2nd movie). Great movie, im a sucker for gorey cannibalistic violence.

Cyonnara
teen, 17 years old
 
Blood, Rape and Family do not mix
Very, very grim. Do not let children anywhere near this movie

jake7642
teen, 16 years old
 
its actually really scary
i am not going to lie, this movie is really cool. the plot is very suspenseful and exciting. that aside, it is probably one of (if not THE most) the bloodiest/goriest, unhappy and dark movies i have ever seen. a man is burned alive in front of his weeping family. a teenage girl is raped by a disgusting mutant cannibal. there is a lot of times when a little baby's life is at risk. for the whole entire second half of the movie the characters are completely 100% DRENCHED with blood. aside from the shock value from all the blood and rape, the enemy is flat out really scary looking, just a picture of them is able to cause nightmares. the movie tries to get to your fears= claustrophobia (he wakes up in a tiny box with mutilated body parts surrounding him, he tries to break the box open while crying and in a pool of guts. helpless= although you are rooting for the family, it is obvious that they probably are not going to make it out of this one, they are in the middle of the desert, running out of food, getting shot raped and burned, and dont have any phone service. all of you who say that saw is the scariest and bloodiest movie out there, i dare you to watch this.

 
THIS MOVIE HAS UNDERAGE RAPE AND SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED BY ANYONE
This movie is sick. It takes a lot and i mean A LOT to offend me. I can handle violence. It doesnt bother me. If you see a horror movie you expect violence. If you dont you're a moron. However seeing a 14 year old girl get raped is not in any way ok. I personally cant believe the actress was ok with doing those scenes. Violence is definately 17+ and all the other r rated stuff but the rape is enough to make this movie unwatchable.

Ajboi89
teen, 15 years old
 
OK...
I only saw the ending on HBO2 and I thought it was sick. This is not for kids (I know that sounds funny that a 12-year-old is saying that).

db1250
teen, 15 years old
 
great remake way better than the original

 
dumb
this movie isnt scary, just bloody

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see The Hills Have Eyes (2006)?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age