The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959)

  • Review Date: May 10, 2009
  • NR
  • Genre: Thriller
  • 1959
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Old-school take on classic story offers thrills, not gore.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

Not yet rated

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that the generally non-graphic violence in this Sherlock Holmes adaptation includes a fatal stabbing, shootings, and an indication that bullying aristocrats have scorched a man in a fireplace. There are also references to young women being sexually violated. Though drops of blood are shown, it could have been a lot worse. Holmes smokes tobacco throughout; other characters drink regularly. Viewers with phobias over spiders and big dogs may find some of the imagery disturbing, though in general the thriller is PG-tame.

  • The heroes are valiant crimefighters, though Holmes pretends to be rude on more than one occasion to get the reactions from suspects/clients that he wants. The Holmes character is an idealization of superior intellect; nonetheless he has a nice, respectful friendship going on with the less-brilliant Watson.
  • No gore, but bloodied corpses shown. A man is beaten by a sadistic gang and then thrust into a fireplace early on. Shootings at close range. Death by knifing. An attempted suicide. Intense (but visually non-explicit flashback) of wicked Sir Hugo
    Baskerville attempting to rape a comely servant girl (and inferences
    that he did this routinely, fathering illegitimate children).
  •  Some low-cut cleavage.
  • A woman angrily called a "witch" by an unsavory character.
  • Of course, the well-known tie-in novel/series exists, with numerous "Sherlockian" societies and Web sites out there in support.
  • Much polite social drinking. Holmes smokes routinely (at least it's explicitly tobacco; in the original stories it's often cocaine!).

What's the story?

An opening flashback shows how the legend of the "Hound of the Baskervilles" began, as a decadent 18th-century British aristocrat on the Devonshire Moors cruelly kills a girl who resists his lust and is straightaway punished with a deadly attack by a vengeful, ghostly dog. More than a century later the great detective, Sherlock Holmes (Peter Cushing) and his companion Dr. Watson (Andre Morrell) are consulted in their London apartment by a Baskerville family doctor, who fears that the last surviving Baskerville descendant, Sir Henry (Christopher Lee), will be in danger from the curse when he arrives to inherit the rich family estate. Haughty Sir Henry doesn't believe in the hound, but an escaped psycho is loose on the Moors, and an unearthly baying howl is heard occasionally. Holmes sends Watson to accompany Sir Henry to the ancestral mansion, certain that villainous forces are indeed plotting against the heir.


Is it any good?

 

Horror-film fans in particular cherish this version of HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES, partially for the lush color and respect for the original characters (Hollywood had stereotyped Dr. Watson as foolish sidekick, while he's intelligent here, as Arthur Conan Doyle intended), but mainly because it cast actors better-known for playing Dracula or Dr. Frankenstein in bloodier flicks. The familiar troupers easily switch to more heroic roles, even if -- rather surprisingly -- the supernatural elements aren't particularly intense, and the dreaded Hound makes only a brief appearance.

In the tradition of great whodunits, nearly everybody seems shifty and suspicious at one point or another, and the fairly short running time is just about right; any longer and the wordy script and formal direction would have been an encumbrance. Peter Cushing later reprised the role of Holmes in the less well-known Masks of Death, while Christopher Lee played the character in Sherlock Holmes and the Incident at Victoria Falls and Sherlock Holmes and the Leading Lady -- and Sherlock's own brother in The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about the character of Holmes, usually said to be (along with Tarzan and Superman) one of the most recognizable fictional heroes around the world. What makes him appealing? Ask kids if they know about the many actors who have played Sherlock Holmes. Who is the best? A documentary, The Many Faces of Sherlock Holmes, is recommended additional viewing. This could, of course, turn kids on to reading the original Conan Doyle stories and the novel The Hound of the Baskervilles, which differs from this film on several key points.


This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title below.


This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
Studio:MGM/UA
Director:Terence Fisher
Cast:Andre Morrell, Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing
Genre:Thriller
Run time:89 minutes
Theatrical release date:July 3, 1959
DVD release date:May 7, 2002
MPAA rating:NR

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959)?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it