 | ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids. |
 | OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age. |
The Human Stain
- Review Date: July 19, 2004
- R
- Genre: Drama
- 2003
Common Sense Media says
Flawed adaptation of Roth's novel isn't for kids.
Parents say
Kids say
What parents need to know
Parents need to know that this movie has some very strong language and some very explicit sexual references and situations, including nudity. Characters drink and smoke, sometimes to excess. Characters are in peril and there are some tragic (offscreen) deaths. The movie's themes about racism and "sanctimony" are provocatively presented.
What's the story?
When Professor Coleman Silk (Anthony Hopkins) calls on two students who aren't present and asks, "Are they spooks?," he's hit with a formal complaint because the two students are African-American, and "spook" is considered a racist epithet. Coleman points out that since he'd never seen the students, he couldn't have meant the word that way. But no one defends him, despite his long-time support for minorities. Coleman has one more rebuttal up his sleeve -- he's a light-skinned African-American who's been "passing" as white for years. Coleman leaves the college and tries unsuccessfully to write about the injustice before asking reclusive novelist Zuckerman (Gary Sinise) to write his story. They become friends, but Zuckerman turns him down. Then Coleman gets involved with the beautiful-but-guarded Faunia (Nicole Kidman), who's stalked by an abusive ex (Ed Harris). Coleman's past is shown in flashbacks, and just as Coleman and Faunia are able to reveal themselves to each other for the first time, volatile forces from the past converge inexorably and terribly.
Is it any good?
THE HUMAN STAIN is a flawed but engrossing story about the way that people try to escape their pasts -- and the way that carefully constructed new personas, no matter how scrubbed and burnished, can't erase the stain of the original. Philip Roth's ambitious and literary novel is awkwardly adapted for the screen. The book's almost allegorical structure is supported by Roth's use of language, but on screen, the characters are more plot devices than people. Zuckerman, though well-played by Sinise, is a narrative convention who adds nothing to the drama. And the menace provided by Faunia's Vietnam veteran ex-husband borders on melodrama.
The most affecting part of the story is the flashbacks. Young Coleman (Wentworth Miller), in love for the first time with a beautiful, intelligent, and sympathetic Midwestern girl (Jacinda Barrett), experiments with the feeling of being not black or white but just free of any color. Then he brings her home to meet his mother (Anna Deavere Smith), not letting either one know ahead of time that they're of different races. Nothing that happens in the Hopkins/Kidman segment of the story is anywhere near as compelling.
What families can talk about
Families can talk about Coleman's choices. What were the turning points? Would he have chosen differently if he had known that the world was about to change so dramatically?
There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title below.
| Studio: | Miramax |
| Director: | Robert Benton |
| Cast: | Anthony Hopkins, Gary Sinise, Nicole Kidman |
| Genre: | Drama |
| Run time: | 107 minutes |
| Theatrical release date: | October 30, 2003 |
| DVD release date: | July 19, 2004 |
| MPAA rating: | R |
| MPAA explanation: | language and sexuality/nudity |
Review It
Great alternatives handpicked by our editors
Already seen it? What do you think?
More from Common Sense Media
Top advice and articles
