The Killing of John Lennon

  • Review Date: January 3, 2008
  • NR
  • Genre: Drama
  • 2008
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Intense, upsetting look inside an assassin's mind.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

Not yet rated

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this grim drama isn't for kids (who probably won't be interested anyway). It focuses on the deterioration of John Lennon assassin Mark David Chapman's mind, and there's a lot of discussion about the murder as he plans it, as well as images of guns, bullets, and shooting practice. Lennon's actual death is especially hectic and harsh. In his hotel room, Chapman overhears two men kissing (they're then shown embracing); he imagines shooting them, calling them "homos." Other language includes "f--k" and "s--t."

  • Chapman is increasingly disturbed, his anger and loneliness clear in his monologues. He plans to kill Lennon throughout the film and doesn't regret the murder when it happens.
  • The film leads to Lennon's assassination, which it foreshadows repeatedly with images of guns, bullets, and jarring camera movements. A character repeats the phrase "bang bang" while forming a gun with his fingers, pointed at the camera. Chapman describes his father's abuse and at one point slams furniture in his room. Scenes from Raging Bull show boxing. Chapman imagines shooting a man through a wall, then bursting into the man's room and shooting him and his male lover (loud, close-up gunfire). Chapman buys a gun, practices aiming at people outside his window, and eventually takes it to shoot Lennon on the sidewalk (Yoko screams in the background, Lennon falls in slow motion, blood spurting). Chapman describes his suicidal thoughts to a doctor.
  • Some brief cleavage shots. Chapman's mother flirts with a young man (she leans close and giggles). Two men kiss and embrace (Chapman listens in from the next room and becomes upset, calling them "homos").
  • Two uses of "f--k," plus a couple of "hells" and one "s--t."
  • Not applicable.
  • Chapman appears drunk -- he holds a bottle in a paper bag, and the images on screen get blurry to indicate his impaired vision.

What's the story?

Drawing from the prison diaries of Mark David Chapman, THE KILLING OF JOHN LENNON imagines what it might be like inside the assassin's mind. Tracing the three months leading up to Chapman's murder of John Lennon on Dec. 8, 1980, Andrew Piddington's film begins in Hawaii, where the 25-year-old Chapman (Jonas Ball) lives with his mother (Krisha Fairchild) and young wife, Gloria (Mie Omori). Lonely and disturbed, he's determined to become famous, and finds his means when he reads The Catcher in the Rye. Identifying with main character Holden Caulfield, Chapman decides to rid the world of the man he considers its greatest "phony": the former Beatle living in New York City.


Is it any good?

 

Gloomy and angry, Chapman doesn't provide much in the way of standard biopic fodder. Certainly, he's extremely troubled; his favorite movies are Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now, and Ordinary People -- which all focus on unhappy individuals trying to change their worlds with violence. "I was Mr. Nobody," Chapman says, "'til I killed the biggest somebody on earth."

While the film relies on some clichés to convey Chapman's distress (low-angle views of his sad face, slow-motion shots of city sidewalks), it also suggests his frustrating contexts: Speedy media and unattainable wealth surround him. Evoking Chapman's inability to see outside his own rage and needs by using long sequences of fragmented images, the movie makes clear that he was less deviant than a logical product of his moment. More tragically, his story can be seen as a projection, a look forward into the "future" (i.e. our own present) of celebrity culture.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about how media attention to the assassination of public figures is appealing to some killers, who desire fame. Can you think of other potentially negative consequences of media news coverage? How about positive ones? Families can also discuss how the movie portrays Chapman: Is he ever sympathetic, as he is plainly troubled and lonely? What do you think of his devotion to the book Catcher in the Rye? If you've read the book, do you think he misunderstands its meaning?


This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Adult
June 29, 2011
 
OUCH!!!
No Kids -15 Strictly Iffy for 16-17 for Adults 18+ INTENSE

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Studio:IFC Entertainment
Director:Andrew Piddington
Cast:Jonas Ball, Krisha Fairchild, Mie Omori
Genre:Drama
Run time:114 minutes
Theatrical release date:January 2, 2008
DVD release date:August 4, 2008
MPAA rating:NR

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see The Killing of John Lennon?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it