Letters from Iwo Jima

  • Review Date: May 21, 2007
  • R
  • Genre: Drama
  • 2006
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Eastwood offers a profound perspective on WWII.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this war drama deals with a very serious subject: the defeat of soldiers who know they'll die and that their cause is lost. Thanks to that and the fact that it's deliberately paced and spoken entirely in Japanese (with English subtitles), it will likely appeal only to older teens. The explosive action scenes include brutal battles with shootings, stabbings, and the use of flamethrowers -- resulting in dismemberment, beheading, burning, bloody injuries, and general chaos. Some wounded soldiers appear in distress, and U.S. Marines take and abuse prisoners. A dog is shot off screen (kids can be heard crying), and a beloved horse is killed in an explosion. A character dies of dysentery (off screen, though he's sick for some time). A couple of soldiers write letters home that reveal their awareness of their imminent bad ends. Characters smoke cigarettes, and officers drink in flashbacks.

  • The soliders are mostly noble, though they're confronted by impossible orders, expected to commit suicide rather than surrender (with an eye to future honor); some soldiers (including Americans) are plainly overzealous and weary, killing out of frustration.
  • Frequent conversation about death and suicide; captain beats his men to make them work harder; battle images are rough, with explosions and bodies flying, as well as close-range stabbings and shootings; Japanese soldiers kill themselves by holding grenades to their chests (explicit effects); a horse is found dead following a bombing raid; blood effects are jarringly red, as most other imagery is in washed-out greys and blues.
  • Flashback discussion of Hanako's pregnancy (Saigo leans into her belly and speaks to their child).

What's the story?

Concentrating on the battle at Iwo Jima, director Clint Eastwood's film depicts the daily grind and worries of the Japanese soldiers that occupied the island, awaiting an inevitable attack by U.S. forces. We see them digging trenches and constructing tunnels for battle, and, at last, waiting to die even as they extol the nobility of their hopeless cause. General Kuribayashi (Ken Watanabe) carries an American Colt .45, which makes him suspect in the eyes of more traditionalist officers, including Admiral Ohsugi (Nobumasa Sakagami). Saigo, a young baker recruited against his will, and the general both write letters home, Saigo to his wife and Kuribayashi to his son Taro. Each, in his own way, understands what's coming, and each embodies a certain nobility that is at once familiar from U.S. war movies and unconventional. They question conventional wisdom and look after their fellows, but neither is inclined to the sort of unquestioning obedience displayed by the fierce Lieutenant Ito (Shido Nakamura), who, unable to convince anyone else to follow him, straps mines to his body and heads off into the night, determined to find an American tank and lie beneath it to blow it up.


Is it any good?

 

Elegant and sad, Letter from Iwo Jim is a war movie about loss. Director Eastwood conceived it as a companion piece to Flags of Our Fathers, and it is at once a more finely focused and more profound film, with violence that can never answer the questions raised by its long moments of anticipation.

The film interrogates the inevitability of loss in war, even when victory is proclaimed. Superiors communicate to their men that the rationale for war is always the future. Ironically, this is precisely what's lost to those who fight, whether they come back with memories or don't come back at all. Letters ends on the beach where it begins, refusing to illustrate a future after loss, concentrating instead on loss itself. It makes war seem too terrible to bear.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about the dedication shown by the Japanese soldiers -- to their nation and sense of cause, and, more immediately, to their commander. How does the movie connect this dedication to their previous experiences? How is their behavior different from that of the U.S. soldiers in Flags of Our Fathers? How does this movie draw connections between history and current events? How does the film argue against war, even as it admires national pride and individual soldiers' bravery? How is the Japanese perspective (filtered through director Clint Eastwood's U.S. lens) different from one that might be considered strictly American? Is there such a thing as the "true" version of history?


This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Adult
July 13, 2010
 
Almost gets the PG-13 rating
A fantastic movie that challenges the viewer to look at war from multiple points of view. The only violent parts is the sucide scene. All of the gore within the film is done with computer generated effects, so it doesnt look as real as Saving Private Ryan.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
May 30, 2010
 
An excellent film showing WWII from the Japanese' perspective.
This movie is arguably Eastwood's best film yet. This is the first war movie (other than Saving Private Ryan) that gave me a real perspective of what savage, gritty war was truly like. It really makes one feel like they're really in the trenches of hell, patriotically fighting for their country. This movie is significantly better than Flags of Our Fathers, (If you haven't seen it, don't bother; it was terrible) as it gave you what not just Americans were going through, but how the Japanese were feeling as the great war raged on. The plot summary of this movie is basically about a young Japanese man's struggle through the battle for Iwo Jima. The visual effects and graphics absolutely astounded me: I loved every minute of it. While this is an incredible movie, there are many, many intense sequences of strong, bloody war violence. The violence is far stronger and bloodier than most war movies I've seen, which is really the only thing parents should be concerned about. The most graphic that parents should be cautioned about are the following: -A horse is seen lying down in it's stable; a nasty wound is seen on his chest. -A man is seen standing from the back view, perfectly normal. when the camera shifts to his frontal view, you see his graphically injured face. (A ton of skin lose or fallen off, a portion of his bloody cheekbones are visable, disturbed tissue is seen protruding from his face, and it's bloody and abhorrent all over) -Many disturbing instances of Japanese soldiers engulfed in flames, violently shot down, and multiple, nasty wounds from explosions. -Many people die from dysentery, nothing is shown, but it is hinted and mild symptoms appear throughout. (Near volmiting, queezyness, etc.) -Many horrific explosions resulting in dismembered Japanese bodies flying through the air and falling on soldiers below. -A man's arm stump is graphically shown with blood spurting out, his bloody arm laying on the ground in front of him with stringy gore protruding from the arm. -In a cave a group of Japanese soldiers commit scuicide using grenades. When they blow themselves up, the gory aftermath is briefly shown for about 2 seconds, and you can see the full set of dismembered and disemboweled bodies in a shot for about 5 seconds. -A man commits scuicide by putting a pistol to his temple and shooting himself. The body is not seen, but a decent amount of blood spurts onto another Japanese soldier's face. (The scuicides are to be honorable; they aren't scuicidal maniacs) -A small group of American soldiers surround a meek Japanese soldier. They start questioning him, not really caring if they got an answer at all and ruthlessy beating the sense out of him. They impale him multiple times; blood splatters on the walls. He screams horribly and they finally jab the gun blade into his neck. While this is very bloody and disturbing, only the shadows of what's happening are visable. -A man loses an eye while fighting; you can see his eye socket for an extremely brief period of time. -A man commits scuicide by putting a shotgun to his head. The scuicide is offscreen, but you can hear the gunshot. It's implied that he killed himself. -Many other strong, violent scenes involving honorable scuicide, graphic violence, and disturbing images; not a film for children. Overall, this is an excellently executed film. The acting is impeccible, the storyline is amazing, and it's just an all-out brilliant film. If you love a good movie with a brilliant story line, amazing acting, and can handle graphic violence, this is the film for you.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
February 24, 2009
 
awesome movie
wow. when i saw the trailer for this movie I thought: "i hope it's better than Flags of Our Fathers." After I watched this movie, It changed my perspective of the Japanese in World War 2. The great thing about this movie is that all of the Japanese soldiers aren't faceless like the ones in Windtalkers. When Japanese soldiers get shot, you think. "ah, I liked that guy". While in most movies you go "yay." I think this movie is fantastic and a must see for teenagers that are liek Military History. Bloody though. No one under 12 would want to see it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
May 30, 2010
 
For another perspective
I take no sides in any war- Japan did attack Pearl Harbor, yet what the US did was inhuman as well (Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the bombing of Tokyo, Osaka, and many other large cities and towns). This breaks away from the American war film stereotype of soldiers yelling and cussing as they mindlessly kill their opponents with no respect at all. However, they do make the Americans seem a little inhuman, yet this is forgivable since many Americans had this same perspective, feeling the Japanese were savages since they did not have some of the technology and traditions as the US. There are mixed plots in this movie. One of the main soldiers is fighting for his pregnant wife back home, and the general is only fighting because he has to under the law, even though he likes the Americans. Others, however, just want to see the Americans die or go back home. The role models can easily be seen, as the general and Saigo-sama. (I add Sama to show respect even though he is fictional. Same to the general.) besides violence, this movie is amazing and sad with great acting and the effect of utter realness. Lastly- the whole suicide deal. I have compaired Asian culture to American, so suicide for honor is not unusual to me and I understand it. But, most people in the US/ or other places where suicide is a taboo, this will be obscene and shocking and will make many people think even less about the Japanese People, so watch for that.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
March 24, 2011
 
War from the Japanese view
This was a very well filmed movie. There war scenes were not to bloody but the film is shot from a different side. That side is of the losing Japanese soldiers who fought and died for Japan. There is smoking in it but a lot of people smoked back then. If you want to watch one of those great war films, this should be one of them.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
Excellent movie
I saw this, and thought it was an excelent. I am not squeamish, so any violent effects don't bother me. The only part I didn't like was the part where the Japanesse torture and kill a U.S Marine. I think if you are o.k with blood and gore, and don't have an issue with repeating swear words, you can see it. I thought it was a powerful and well-made film. (please excuse my spelling)

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
April 9, 2008
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
February 26, 2010
 
Letters from Iwo Jima
I love WWll movies, and this is very close to being my all time favorite. Eastwood has done it yet again.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Studio:Warner Bros.
Director:Clint Eastwood
Cast:Kazunari Ninomiya, Ken Watanabe, Tsuyoshi Ihara
Genre:Drama
Run time:141 minutes
Theatrical release date:December 20, 2006
DVD release date:May 22, 2007
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:graphic war violence.

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Letters from Iwo Jima?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it