The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Outstanding, but much violence and scariness.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that violence in this fantasy spectacle includes countless battle casualties with death by arrows, spears, swords, monster-stomping, fatal plunges, and explosions. Horses as well as elephant-like beasts are killed violently (sure, sure, they're CGI). There is quite a lot of glorification of bladed weaponry, as well as nightmarish imagery of ghoulish creatures, including a zombie-like ghost army and a hideous giant spider. Heroic characters smoke, drink and get drunk. The story starts right where the previous Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers left off. Viewers not familiar with the first film (or J.R.R. Tolkien's novels) will be very confused. Not only is this Oscar winner a long movie, the DVD "Special edition" is even longer.

  • Powerful message of friendship among the hobbits and the other allies (including different species). The seemingly meek hobbits earn Middle-Earth-wide respect through battle and heroism. Theme throughout of sacrifice made in an immense struggle, including fighting against seemingly impossible odds and overwhelming numbers, and trying to be brave against inevitable death.
  • Heroes are valiant types who combat against evil even when everything looks hopeless. A sword-wielding princess is a strong female warrior, even though males (like her kingly father) try to discourage her from fighting. On the other hand, there is a subplot acknowledgment that not all royalty behaves royally; an aristocratic regent mistreats his younger son to the point of nearly causing the character's death. And just as in the Tolkien novels, a foreign army who are the only nonwhite, non-Celtic-type races are on the side of the bad guys.
  • Violence is savage and intense for a PG-13. Thousands of creatures and humans are speared, slashed, hit fatally with arrows, crushed, decapitated, impaled on large spikes and in the opening scene, painfully strangled to death. There is a catapult-shower of severed human heads, venom-stings from a monster spider, and characters burning to death. A key character's finger is bitten off.
  • Mild romance.
  • Not applicable.
  • Hard to ignore the original Tolkien books, not to mention a plethora of video games, movie tie-in action figures, role-playing games, plus the movie sequels and other existing adaptations.
  • Joyous drinking to the point of inebriation in a celebration. Pipe smoking.

What's the story?

One of the most ambitious projects in the history of filmmaking comes to a heart-poundingly thrilling conclusion in RETURN OF THE KING, the last episode in Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy directed by Peter Jackson. The second installment opened in the middle of the action, but this one begins with a flashback, in which we learn more about Gollum, the twisted, tortured creature who is supposed to be leading Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Samwise Gamgee (Sean Astin) to Mount Doom. We also learn more about the power of that ring to make anyone willing to give up all he has to possess it. After that very brief prologue, we are back where we left off, a literal cliff-hanger. Frodo, Sam, and Gollum are crossing the stark peaks on the way to the volcano in the heart of Mount Doom. That is where the ring was forged and the only place where it can be destroyed. Meanwhile, the other remaining members of the Fellowship of the Ring prepare for battle with the forces led by Sauron.


Is it any good?

 

As with the first two chapters, Peter Jackson's rendition of the J. R. R. Tolkien classics is astonishing. Every detail is just right, and from the struggles of three very small creatures to stay alive as they scale sheer rock to the huge battles with hundreds of thousands of warriors, every moment is vivid, exciting, and moving. That means not just Middle earth citadels, a giant spider, and thousands of phantom combatants, but also smaller moments of equal power. Sam and Gollum each try to make Frodo mistrust the other. There are villains, grotesque and powerful, weak and greedy. And there are heroes, loyal, brave, devoted, honorable.

The tone is epic and majestic, the battles brilliantly staged, the vistas magnificently conceived. But it's still all about the story. Characters learn and deepen. Even little Pippin and Merry go from cute comic relief to genuine heroes. There is so much going on that some characters feel like not much more than cameo guest appearances, especially Arwen (Liv Tyler) and Galadriel (Cate Blanchette). And the post-ending endings, after more than three hours, may seem a bit too much. But this is still an epic to satisfy the most devoted Tolkien fans, and viewers who are new to Middle Earth. In its own way, it is as thrilling an adventure in story-telling on film as the quest it portrays.


What families can talk about

  • Families can talk about why they think Frodo was charged with carrying the ring.

  • You can also talk about the modern-day parallels to these stories since Tolkien wrote the books as parables. And how were Tolkien's parables different from C. S. Lewis', Tolkien's longtime friend and colleague?


This review was written by Nell Minow
Teen, 13 years old
December 23, 2010
 
BME! Best Movie Ever!
I LOVED THIS MOVIE!!!!!! i think everyone in the world should watch it! it had the best epic battle scenes in the world and the characters were well-developed and good role models! the only part in the whole movie that was mildly disgusting was when the orks chucked the heads of the good guy's soldiers at gondor's army. and the part w/ the spider was gross but kinda fun to watch. I am a girl, and I think this movie is great!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
May 12, 2011
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
May 29, 2011
 
The best of the trilogy; the last of the trilogy; the most scary, bloody, intense, and violent of the trilogy.
My rating: PG-13 for intense sequences of epic battle violence, disturbing images and a brief scene involving drinking.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
February 15, 2011
 
Great movie
It's very good and exiting but has a lot of violance.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
June 7, 2010
 
This, The Fellowship of the Ring, and Two Towers are my favorite movies. It is so great, you won't want to miss it. You need to watch the series. They are amazing! The battle scenes are great, because... they aren't dull, or boring or anything, but they aren't horrible either! It's just perfect!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
April 3, 2011
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
March 9, 2011
 
Good for anyone.
Really? This movie is a classic, and should be watched (and read) by everyone. It has war. Big whoop. It's about as bloody as Poke'mon. That is to say: no blood, no language, no sex, no nudity. The violence in this film is watered down by the amount of stuff going on during the scene. There is so much violence, but it's like Super Mario Bros. style. No blood, but "ugh, I got stabbed. I'm dead." Also, the entire movie is about good triumphing over evil.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
February 2, 2011
 
good for mature 14 year olds and older
really good! graphic intese violence, not good for anyone 14 or under

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
July 5, 2011
 
It deserves its Oscar.
This movie is very violent, first of all. Some of the battle sequences are long and gory, and at times they can make people cringe. Hey, its a war. This war, however, realistically describes the toll it can take on the characters and what each side is willing to do in order to achieve victory. Overall, though, this movie is filled with spectacular imagery and complex characters. The straightforward story is easy and still entertaining to follow. It's so artistic and magical it deserves its Oscar.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
June 10, 2011
 
The final Lord of the Rings is spectacular as always
Jackson concludes The Lord of the Rings with a bang as the quest comes to its epic finish. The cast, direction, visuals, cinematography, and sound are all top notch. Need I say more? Note to parents: Plenty of violence in this one as well. Long battle scenes, fierce looking creatures, and dark sets may be enough to frighten most young kids. A great ride for teenagers and up.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Nell Minow
Topics:magic and fantasy
Studio:New Line
Director:Peter Jackson
Cast:Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Viggo Mortensen
Genre:Fantasy
Run time:200 minutes
Theatrical release date:December 19, 2003
DVD release date:May 25, 2004
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:intense epic battle sequences and frightening images

This review was written by Nell Minow
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Register now to save reviews and advice articles to your personal lists!


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it