The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Violent action sequel should've stayed buried.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this third installment in The Mummy series has plenty of action violence, which may be a big draw for kids. Only a few of scenes are actually gory -- faces melting off, men about to be decapitated or dismembered -- but most of the battle scenes involve explosions, sword fights, guns, and hand-to-hand combat. Be prepared for the vast hordes of skeleton warriors; they could be quite scary for younger viewers. There's relatively little swearing, although hero Rick does refer to two Chinese soldiers as "Ying" and "Yang." In addition to a few kisses, a woman appears in a long negligee, and two characters appear about to make love (passionate kissing lying down).

  • The emperor is obsessed with world domination. Alex lies to his parents about attending college. Characters betray each other. Rick jokingly calls two Chinese people "Ying" and "Yang." The O'Connells act like their lives are only bearable when they're involved in some dangerous adventure.
  • Lots of action violence and implied gore: faces melt, a man is about to be quartered, several shots of near decapitations, limbs are dismembered, bodies are stabbed and shot. Huge Yetis appear as scary CGI panther-like creatures. There are hordes of skeletal warriors (a la Pirates of the Caribbean).
  • Evie appears in a nightgown to seduce her husband. Rick makes a joke about "inspiring" his wife in the bedroom. Two or three passionate kisses. A couple seems about to make love, but they're clothed.
  • Words include "bastard," "ass," and "rot in hell."
  • Not applicable.
  • Clubgoers drink champagne and cocktails; a character swigs straight from a liquor bottle; a couple has wine for dinner.

What's the story?

In the third film in the Mummy franchise, Rick and Eveyln O'Connell (Brendan Fraser and Maria Bello, who took the role over from Rachel Weisz) are living a life of bored luxury in 1946 England -- until they're asked to personally escort a priceless crystal back to China. They don't know that their 21-year-old son, Alex (Luke Ford), is also in China on a dangerous expedition, instead of in college as they believed. Soon after they meet up, all three O'Connells must try to stop the crystal from awakening the ancient terra cotta army and its ruthless leader, the Dragon Emperor (Jet Li).


Is it any good?

 

The first two Mummy movies were far from action masterpieces, but when you compare them to THE MUMMY: TOMB OF THE DRAGON EMPEROR, they seem like Oscar contenders. Without director Stephen Sommers at the helm and Weisz playing Evie, the new movie lacks the central chemistry that made the first two films charmingly bearable. Although it's always a pleasure to see Li and Michelle Yeoh (who plays a witch who cursed the emperor and his army to their stone tombs) show off their considerable martial arts skills, the action sequences are cribbed from parts of The Lord of the Rings and Pirates of the Caribbean (note to action directors: undead skeleton armies are officially passe).

Although the battle scenes are what most moviegoers crave, that's no excuse for sloppy dialogue and poor acting. Why young newcomer Ford thinks a pseudo-Bronx accent peppered with his native Aussie cadences is what the son of a rich American and his educated English wife would sound like is rather misguided and continuously annoying. Fraser, meanwhile, who's proved that he's adept at more than a popcorn blockbuster, phones in a performance so blah that it's hard to believe his character was likable in the first two films. There's no doubt that this movie will attract young audiences desperate for more high-decibel, CGI-heavy violence, but it would've been so much better had this particular Mummy not been unearthed.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about whether sequels are generally as good as the originals. Can you think of any that are? Does it matter when, as in this case, one of the main actors doesn't come back? Also, the bulk of the film is set in China: How is Chinese culture represented? How does that depiction relate to the time period in which the movie takes place? Did you learn anything about Chinese culture?


This review was written by Sandie Angulo Chen
Kid, 13 years old
June 6, 2011
 
GO SEE IT. now
So good. Quite funny actually. A mans face melts off. BTW the yeti's are really cute and i want one

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
November 2, 2010
 
good action movie but not as good as the first two mummy movies.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 10 and 13 year old
August 29, 2010
 
Not the best movie, but ok. for 10 and up.
The only concern I would consider is the violence and scary scenes. No bad language to speak of. As far as quality, nothing like the first two Mummy movies. Has gone down hill

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
August 9, 2010
 
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Violent.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
July 13, 2010
 
Mummy Overkill
I am a huge fan of the Mummy films from the early 2000s, and those were well-made and wrapped up the story just fine. I loved the acting and characters. I don't think this movie should've been made. Sure, it's great to add onto a classic series, but not with a completely different cast with terrible acting ability. It has nothing to do with the previous films, and well, let's face it- the storyline sucks. There is random humor thrown in everywhere, the only of which is funny are Jonathan's lines. The script is just as bad as the acting. I think the film would've worked and be less of a corny spinoff if Rachel Weisz was still in it, but it's still a mummy overkill...this one should've stayed dead.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
December 15, 2009
 
I love it

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
March 13, 2011
 
its fine for tweens
the 3rd was the best but it had to much violence and language for kids to see,

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
March 13, 2011
 
its fine for tweens
the 3rd was the best but it had to much violence and language for kids to see,

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
March 13, 2011
 
its fine for tweens
the 3rd was the best but it had to much violence and language for kids to see,

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
January 20, 2011
 
this film has mild language like a-s,b------d,and one h--l

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Sandie Angulo Chen
Studio:Universal Pictures
Director:Rob Cohen
Cast:Brendan Fraser, Jet Li, Maria Bello
Genre:Action/Adventure
Run time:119 minutes
Theatrical release date:July 31, 2008
DVD release date:December 15, 2008
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:adventure action and violence.

This review was written by Sandie Angulo Chen
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

 

vote now

Will you see The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it