New in Town

  • Review Date: January 28, 2009
  • PG
  • Genre: Comedy
  • 2009
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Formulaic romantic comedy has mostly mild content.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this clichéd romantic comedy has some charm but relies heavily on broad stereotypes -- the driven career woman who melts for the right guy, gee-whiz Midwesterners with Fargo accents, etc. -- for its humor. And its message is an unsurprising one about learning to appreciate more of life. Expect some relatively mild swearing (including "s--t"), a few scenes with drinking (including one in which the main character gets drunk), and some kissing and sexual innuendo (mentions of a woman's nipples and thong, for example), but no nudity or violence.

  • The film means well, but it relies heavily on broad stereotypes -- especially those of career women and small-town people in Minnesota. A woman appears to be cold-hearted and judgmental at first but changes over the course of the movie. Characters lie by omission but later feel bad and try to make amends.
  • A man is accidentally shot, but it's played for laughs. Some yelling.
  • Some kissing; references to a woman's nipples and thong.
  • Relatively mild swearing, including "damn," "a--hole," "ass," "oh my God," "hell," "son of a bitch," and a few uses of "s--t."
  • Closeups on products like high-heeled shoes and handbags (the Chanel logo is visible on one). Signage for various tbusinesses, etc., including UPS and Munck Foods.
  • Some beer drinking at a bar; a woman gets drunk on wine when her car gets stuck in a snow bank.

What's the story?

Miami food exec Lucy Hill (Renne Zellweger) wants a vice presidency job so bad she can taste it. Which explains why she volunteers to help streamline her firm's manufacturing plant in the town of New Ulm, Minn. -- an undertaking that could take months (during winter, to boot). Lucy's all business when she first arrives; the workers are suspicious, and an early run-in with handsome union rep Ted (Harry Connick Jr.) goes awry. But her walls inevitably topple in the face of her assistant's relentless cheeriness, and before long Lucy's grown attached to her employees and neighbors, especially Ted ... just in time for her to discover that her boss wants to shutter the factory for good.


Is it any good?

 

Don't be surprised if you're overwhelmed by deja vu while watching NEW IN TOWN, because it isn't fresh at all, title notwithstanding. It resembles almost every other fish-out-of-water romantic comedy -- with a dash of Northern Exposure thrown in -- and doesn't do much to move the genre forward. Girl meets boy, who's her polar opposite. Girl hates boy, and vice versa. Girl and boy get to see each other's tender side via predictable plot point. Girl and boy fall in love. Monkey wrench appears; relationship seems doomed. But, naturally, girl and boy work it out.

Still, despite its predictability, the film does have some charm. The cast gels well, thanks in no small part to the presence of veterans like Frances Conroy and J.K. Simmons. More importantly, the two leads do have strong chemistry, and Zellweger exudes such warmth that you can't help but like her. Or at least you can't help wanting to like her, even when she does patently foolish things -- wearing a suit jacket in the middle of a Minnesota winter, for instance -- that seem more like clichhd storytelling than anything else. New in Town isn't particularly revolutionary nor memorable, but it does get points for trying.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about whether it's OK to play stereotypes -- whether of people or locations -- for laughs. How does the movie portray women and people from small-town Minnesota? Is it accurate or exaggerated? Can you think of movies with stronger positive female role models? Families can also discuss why so many Hollywood romantic comedies are about opposites attracting. Do you think relationships like that are as frequent (and as successful) in real life?


This review was written by S. Jhoanna Robledo
Teen, 16 years old
February 2, 2010
 
Love it!
I loved this movie. Me and my mom watched it and we laughed the whole movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
August 27, 2009
 
OH MY GOSH! PG???????
This movie totally deserved a PG-13 rating.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
May 31, 2009
 
Surprising Language for "PG"
I myself think this probably should've stayed PG-13 (it was rerated to PG), but I loved this movie! It's a good family movie. Lots of funny moments, an only one very quick instance of blood. I was surprised this still got PG due to the amount of cursing. But I love it and you should see it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
March 31, 2010
 
New In Town was in MY TOWN!
Honestly, I wouldn't have watched this movie if it wasn't filmed in my VERY OWN NEIGHBOURHOOD! Oh, and I don't live in Minnesota, I live in Manitoba, and they filmed this movie in Winnipeg, a couple of streets away from my house! Yes, you can see my neighbours houses in the movie, which is pretty cool! It was an okay story, with a little bit of heartwarming diologue thrown in for good measure, but I think it was more exciting to watch with friends and neighbours, screaming when we recognized something.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
June 17, 2009
 
Don't take your kids
PG? More like PG-13

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
February 15, 2009
 
Well.....................
New In Town was a very ok movie! The message was not very good! But great potential! They referr to nipples and thong! Not a very good....... well go see it for yourself

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
March 10, 2011
 
this is a great movie for the hole family! The movie follows a verry seious bussness women from the city who movies to a samll town in wisconson to manage a company. while there she finds out 1st hand how diferent it is to live in a small town and about the importance of friends family and careing about people! the movie is very funny and has a good message!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
July 5, 2010
 
Okay
It's okay...not really worth-seeing.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
November 13, 2010
 
average and a little funny
its worth checking out but you probably wont watch it again. not as innapropriate as people think.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 15 year old
May 28, 2009
 
Good movie; don't take the kids.
NiT was a very cute movie that was funny & enjoyable, if simple, but it had some issues. For starters, I think this definitely should have been a PG-13 movie. Between more recent PG films like this & Bride Wars, I really think the movie ratings association has lowered their standards for todays PG movies. They're becoming more & more filled with inappropriate material that should merit them an PG-13 rating. For instance: this movie included references to a woman wearing a thong. Also for like a good 10 minutes Renee Z.'s nipples are visible through her shirt (it is implied that she is cold). While scenes like this one were highly amusing, I also think they're a bit too crude for a PG film. There was also a pretty heavy make-out scene, though it was interrupted, & there was a comment about how a girl can't tell whether a man with a lazy eye is looking at her or her breasts. There was also a lot of alcohol content, which I don't think sends good messages to younger kids. In one scene, Renee Z.'s character gets trapped in her car in a snowdrift & to stay warm she downs nearly a whole bottle of wine & is insanely drunk by the time she is rescued. There were also many other various scenes of people with liquor, as well as several bar scenes (Renee's character also becomes the butt of a drinking game joke). However, I think the main thing that concerned me about NiT was the language. I was appalled with the language. A**, a-hole, & dumb a** were used several times, as were h*ll & d*mn. Sh*t was also used a couple of times, which was the main thing I was shocked about. B*tch was used several times & mother F was used once though it was cut off; Renee screams "MOTHERF--!!" then the door she just walked out of slams cutting the rest of it off. In one scene a man starts to say what sounds like godd*mn but changes it to goddang. Overall, it was a very good movie with a lot of heart & laughs, I just wouldn't take the kiddos to go see it.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by S. Jhoanna Robledo
Studio:Lionsgate
Director:Jonas Elmer
Cast:Harry Connick Jr., J.K. Simmons, Renee Zellweger
Genre:Comedy
Run time:96 minutes
Theatrical release date:January 30, 2009
DVD release date:May 19, 2009
MPAA rating:PG
MPAA explanation:language and some suggestive material

This review was written by S. Jhoanna Robledo
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see New in Town?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it