The Scorpion King

 Review

Common Sense Media says

On the silly popcorn scale, it works pretty well.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie has a lot of action violence, meaning that it is not too graphic or gory. There are some vivid images, including attacking cobras, an impaled body, and a dead child. And there are very vivid sound effects making on- and off-screen violence more explicit with spurting and squishing sounds. There are sexual references and non-explicit sexual situations, including two women in a man's bed. There are no four-letter words, but there are some strong epithets.

  • Action violence, impaled bodies, child in peril, snakes, fire, swords.
  • Non-explicit sexual situations, including two women in bed with a man.
  • No profanity but strong language.

What's the story?

Some very scary looking guys are about to kill a guy who would be even scarier-looking if he wasn't tied up. But then everyone steps back in awe of a guy who steps in looking scariest of all and as they hesitate, he cocks an eyebrow and says simply, "Boo." That is the Rock (WWF star Dwayne Johnson) and he plays Mathayus, the title role, in this prequel to the Mummy movies, giving us the background of the character who appeared briefly but memorably in the second one as half-man, half very large bug. In THE SCORPION KING, Mathayus and two others are hired by local tribes to kill the evil tyrant Memnon (Steven Brand).


Is it any good?

 

The Scorpion King doesn't pretend to having anything like the wit and charm of the Mummy movies, which were a loving tribute to Saturday morning serials. But it works pretty well, largely due to its star. The Rock has genuine screen presence. He even manages most of the material better than Michael Clarke Duncan who is just too much of an actor to deliver the cheesy dialogue with the right mix of sincerity and irony, and Peter Facinelli, whose thin-voiced delivery doesn't convey the necessary petulant malevolence.

There is one innovation worth mentioning. In action movies, the hero is almost always stoic, even when he gets hurt. Think of Rambo sewing up his own wounds. But the Rock, carrying over the conventions of professional wrestling, grimaces in pain when he gets hurt. It doesn't rise to the level of acting, but in a funny way I think that it adds some heart to the story.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about Memnon's claim that order was better than freedom. They may also want to talk about how the sorceress protected herself from Memnon.


This review was written by Nell Minow
Teen, 15 years old
August 27, 2011
 
Bad mainstream flick aims at money and lacks... everything.
"The Mummy" was not something great, but at least it was funny. Then "The Mummy Returns" followed and was also funny. Then they decided to make a prequel/spinoff from TMR. The movie is boring, thinking it is original and epic, but fails at everything. The Rock acts like he is a robot, the effects are pretty average, the plot is somewhat familiar, the script features no memorable quotes and it is just a bad movie. That is all i can say. But at least it is better than "Scorpion King 2" which was literally the worst movie i have ever seen. But still, this is just bad. The violence in this movie is not that strong. You briefly see a decapitated head, of which i think, that children under the age of 12 will not handle. But it is not a bloody movie or something.

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
June 24, 2010
 
couple word explanation
sucked wasted time this movie sucked i wuz disappointed

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
February 14, 2011
 
Suggested MPAA Rating: R for strong violence throughout and partial nudity.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
January 7, 2010
 
The Scorpion King
Cool movie. One of Dwayne's best films. Great action with a bit of humor thrown into it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
May 8, 2009
 
Not that violent, in which it is. But it's too sensual and has a lot of nudity.
The sexual content was sort of graphic. In many scenes you can almost see her breasts.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
Good Fantasy Adventure
Good teen movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
April 9, 2008
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
May 19, 2012
 
Great spin-off with nice acting
This was a great addition to the Mummy franchise. It might not compare to the first film, but it's definitely better than the second film, and it was good enough to start a franchise of it's own sequels (which were not as good). It's acting is very nice and the humor is well-balanced. But it seems not to fit the Scorpion King's description shown in The Mummy Returns: in that film, he was said to be evil and power-hungry, but here he is a hero and a good role model. I guess I like him better this way. It's not The Rock's type of movie, but he is nonetheless very dedicated and proves to turn the movie into a thrill ride of fun.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Nell Minow
Studio:Universal Pictures
Director:Chuck Russell
Cast:Dwayne The Rock Johnson, Kelly Hu, Michael Clarke Duncan
Genre:Action/Adventure
Run time:92 minutes
Theatrical release date:April 19, 2002
DVD release date:October 1, 2002
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:violence and sexual situations

This review was written by Nell Minow
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see The Scorpion King?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it