Parents need to know that the plot concerns a nonhuman entity asking quasi-religious questions like the purpose of life, and whether there is a creator. Just as confounding: what version of this movie will you find? There are both G- and PG-rated cuts of this on video. The original theatrical release was, in fact, rated G. A harsher rating on the video reflects more the changing attitudes toward that MPAA classification than the movie content; Paramount evidently decided a G might make video consumers think this was the one where Kirk meets Barney the Dinosaur. It's worth noting that the "PG" director's-edition VHS is in letterboxed widescreen -- really the way this expensive f/x spectacle was meant to be seen and appreciated -- and has an interesting making-of documentary with the participants 20 years later, and a prolonged intro of theme music. The DVD is crammed with similar extras and commentaries.
Positive messages:The United Federation of Planets is, by order of Gene Roddenberry, famously multicultural, multi-ethnic, even multi-species. While the crew of the Enterprise demonstrate some basic human foibles (Kirk is too eager to regain command, McCoy suspects Spock's motives), they still function well as a unit of people who care about one another. Some commentators have pointed to the main trio of Star Trek as summing up aspects of a well-rounded, complete person: Kirk for decisive action and passion, Spock for cold logic and intellect, Dr. McCoy for emotion and altruistic kindness.
Violence & scariness:Space vessels are disintegrated into nothingness. A few crew are knocked around and scorched by energy bolts. A Vulcan nerve pinch. Minor characters perish in a transporter malfunction, but the horrific result is left to the imagination.
Sexy stuff:Mention that Decker formerly had intimate relations with a comely alien. She spends a lot of the movie in a robe with a very short hemline, and there is generalized talk about her species having a powerful psychic sexual allure (behave, Mr. Sulu!).
Consumerism:Nothing onscreen, but Star Trek, as a marketing franchise, has toys and products in "infinite diversity in infinite combinations," to quote a favorite Gene Roddenberry saying.
Before a few nights ago, I'd never seen the old STAR TREK movies (I know; shocker). I saw THE VOYAGE HOME on a shelf, and, knowing that the plot was independent of the others, picked it up and watched it. I was wowed; it was sharp, funny, intense, and intelligent. This one...not at all. If you're hoping to watch the first to gain character knowledge: you won't get it. In fact, you're better off starting with number two.
That said, there's little objectionable content. People are vaporized (their forms are seen screaming before they disappear), and there are some "d**n"s and "hells".
This was the first Trek movie and had ground breaking special effects (for the day). However, there is a very long period of musical interludes where there is no dialogue. My 11 year-old loves Star Trek and wanted me to fastforward through this really long sequence. But, for me, it was neat to see all the cast members. In this film they all look so young and skinny (William Shatner, for instance). Compared with others in the franchise, this one is very tame in terms of action and violence.
well, i wish it was more interesting. had a boring plot and was slow moving. watch it if you wish. i wouldn't recommend it unless you're a die-hard fan... or a "trekkie" but even then...
The violent content in this movie is practically nonexistent. In a few scenes, an alien machine fires at other ships and turns them into what looks like static electricity. Later, an alien beam does this to one of the characters. Most cartoons are more violent then that, though. The language is comparable to most PG movies, you'll hear a few "D" words. The message at the end of the movie is a very good one. The movie ends when an artificial intelligence realizes that he can't grow without faith. Just like most of the episodes of the original series, this one ends with a moral message.