Two for the Money

  • Review Date: December 15, 2006
  • R
  • Genre: Drama
  • 2005
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Movie about gambling in sports is for adults only.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

Not yet rated

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie is focused on not very grown up boys behaving badly. That is, they smoke and drink frequently; they also pursue and have sex with beautiful women (including prostitutes), and compete ferociously with one another. The movie includes strong language (over 50 uses of the f-word, in addition to sexual slang), and occasional nudity (including frequent shots of the young protagonist's muscled torso). The film's focus is gambling, treated here as an addiction (the soundtrack includes the theme for "Superfly," with lyrics about pushers), but also made thrilling in the visual images of sports events and viewers of those events excited by winning bets. An unhappy client beats Brandon and then urinates on him, in a public park.

  • Gamblers, addicts, cheaters: the boys here learn lessons, but at some costs.
  • A disturbing broken leg in a football game early on, a few fights, and a beatdown by a brutal rich man, accompanied by his hired thug.
  • Women in revealing clothing, men showing their chests, a soft-focus sex scene.
  • Much rough language, used by angry men and sports fans. 50+ uses of the f-word.
  • Discussions of car brands, liquor brands, and designer clothing.
  • Frequent drinking and smoking.

What's the story?

In TWO FOR THE MONEY, Al Pacino plays Walter, an aging mentor to a young, able, arrogant rookie. His student is Brandon (Matthew McConaughey), onetime sports devotee (baseball as a child, football as a teen and college student) who never recovers from a devastating injury during a big college game. And so he's working in a cubicle, answering 900-number lines and feeling bored. Brandon thus welcomes what appears to be his rescue by Walter, who gets wind of Brandon's remarkably good percentage in picking winners for sporting events. He moves to New York and into Walter's building, where he spends all his time working out and doing his sports homework, picking winners for clients at an astounding rate. Rechristened "John Anthony," he adopts a new persona, with slicked-back haircut and designer suits, and, painfully naive rube that he is, believes that the pretty girl (Jaime King) Walter purchases for him one evening actually "likes" him. But Walter's got all kinds of ulterior motives, none especially disguised, except, it seems, to Brandon. For one thing, he's a former gambler-addict-mess himself, now seeming to focus his energies on his six-year-old daughter and recovering junkie/beauty salon owner wife Toni (Rene Russo).


Is it any good?

 

Though Toni believes that "Walter's held together by meetings," the film reveals otherwise, in part by making its smartest point -- not gambling on gambling is still gambling. That is, while Walter and Brandon and their fellow handicappers all talk big about not actually gambling, only picking winners for clients and drawing money from their winnings, in fact, it's all gambling. While Toni's untold story hints at intriguing complications (how did she meet Walter and why is she devoted to him?), Brandon's saga is as boring as can be. He gets cocky, he overreaches, he falls (during one especially yucky punishment scene, a client [Armand Assante] finds him in Central Park and has a thug hold him down so the client can urinate all over him). Eventually, Brandon finds his way back to himself, that is, Brandon rather than "John Anthony" (again, his faith in a real self that might be lost and found is rather quaint). Walter's story is much more compelling, because he does, at some level, get what gambling is about.

At one point during his lessons for Brandon, he drags the student and Toni into a Gamblers' Anonymous meeting and begins, by way of a speech about his long-term sobriety and his earnest understanding of the group members' complaints, explains that they're addicted to losing, then invites them to use his service, in order to be winners. "Gambling's not the problem. We're the problem," he rasps, "We're lemons. We're addicted to losing." It's something of an ingenious speech, ebbing and flowing, and Pacino chews it up as you might expect. It's a lie, too, which is the underlying point of Two for the Money. Losing or winning is not what's at issue in gambling. Rather, it's the potential that can be experienced only in the pre-conclusion moments. And here it becomes clear that Toni is the major stake for the two boys.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about how the film presents gambling. When does it stop being an enjoyable leisure activity and become an addiction? How does the sports-betting industry -- shady as it appears here -- encourage pathological behavior? How does the father-son relationship between Walter and Brandon hinge on their competitiveness? How does Walter's distrust (of his wife, his employees, and his friends) affect his personal and political relationships?


This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
red hot and swaring
this movie has massive swaring and i would not worry about the violence but it is a good movie

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent
February 27, 2012
 
Find another line of work.
Garbage pure garbage, waste of flim..

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Studio:Universal Pictures
Director:D.J. Caruso
Cast:Al Pacino, Matthew McConaughey, Rene Russo
Genre:Drama
Run time:122 minutes
Theatrical release date:October 7, 2005
DVD release date:January 17, 2006
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:pervasive language, a scene of sexuality and a violent act.

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Two for the Money?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it