 | ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids. |
 | OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age. |
The Way Back
- Review Date: January 17, 2011
- PG-13
- Genre: Action/Adventure
- 2011
Common Sense Media says
Rousing but intense war/wilderness survival adventure.
Parents say
Kids say
QUALITY
What parents need to know
Parents need to know that because this rousing, World War II-era adventure film focuses on prison and wilderness survival, there's plenty of intense, disturbing imagery -- such as blood, sickness, starvation, and death. But at the same time, the movie has strong, inspiring messages related to teamwork, kindness, and overcoming challenges. Expect a bit of violence and infrequent but strong swearing (including "f--k"), as well as images of naked women in the form of drawings used as prison currency. Characters also trade cigarettes while they're imprisoned and, in one scene, share a bottle of vodka.
What's the story?
During World War II, Janusz (Jim Sturgess) is arrested and thrown into a Siberian gulag. With the help of more experienced inmates like Valka (Colin Farrell) and "Mr. Smith" (Ed Harris), seven prisoners manage a successful escape into the woods. Along the way, they pick up a runaway girl, Irena (Saoirse Ronan), despite worries that she'll slow them down. Against all odds, they survive the harsh, freezing elements and complete the long trek south to the Mongolian border. But circumstances are against them, and they discover that they must keep walking, through Mongolia and Tibet and into India, across the dry, brutal flatlands. How long can this ragtag band stay alive?
Is it any good?
As he did in the excellent Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, Australian director Peter Weir makes this wartime tale a sleek, rousing, old-fashioned adventure instead of a somber, self-important epic slog. He accomplishes that by focusing on the relationships between the men and taking a cue from old-time studio filmmakers like Howard Hawks.
THE WAY BACK is arguably less fun than Master and Commander, mainly because of the disturbing imagery (i.e. starvation, sickness, death, etc.) that inherently goes with prison movies and wilderness survival movies. But Weir makes it all bearable with his general swiftness and tone. The actors follow suit with warm performances from everyone involved, especially Farrell as a dangerous but boisterous misfit. In the end, teamwork, sharing, and kindness win out over violence and cruelty.
What families can talk about
Families can talk about the movie's violence and disturbing imagery. Was it necessary to the plot? Was it thrilling or upsetting? How did the movie achieve that reaction?
How do the characters change over the course of the movie? What do they learn?
Some of the male characters think that bringing a girl (Irena) along will slow them down. Is this a stereotype? Does Irena prove them wrong, or not? What do they learn from her?
- Show:
- All members
- Parents
- Teens & kids
AGE
I thought this was a really great movie with a fantastic ending!!!!!!
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
not that much emotionally involving but very epic like slow paced movie.
Directed by six-time Academy Award (R) nominee Peter Weir, THE WAY BACK is an epic story of survival, solidarity and indomitable human will. Shot in Bulgaria, Morocco and India, the film stars Jim Sturgess (Across the Universe, The Other Boleyn Girl), Ed Harris (Appaloosa) and Colin Farrell (In Bruges) as prisoners of a Soviet Union labor camp, who, along with four others, flee their Siberian Gulag and begin a treacherous journey across thousands of miles of hostile terrain. Academy Award (R) nominee Saoirse Ronan (Atonement, The Lovely Bones) and Mark Strong (Body of Lies, RocknRolla) co-star. Written by Weir and Keith Clarke, the film is Peter's first since 2003's Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World. It is inspired by the acclaimed book The Long Walk: The True Story of a Trek to Freedom, as well as first-person accounts and anecdotes as told to, and researched by Weir and executive producer Clarke. Produced by Joni Levin, Peter Weir, Duncan Henderson (Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World) and Nigel Sinclair (Terminator 3: Salvation), THE WAY BACK is an Exclusive Media Group, National Geographic Entertainment and ImageNation Abu Dhabi presentation and an Exclusive Films production. Keith Clarke, John Ptak, Guy East, Simon Oakes, Tobin Armbrust, Jake Eberts, Edward Borgerding, Mohamed Khalaf, Adam Leipzig, Scott Rudin and Jonathan Schwartz are Executive Producers. The film's Co-Producer is Roee Sharon Peled and Co-Executive Producer is Alex Brunner. Weir has assembled an accomplished group of filmmakers with whom he has previously collaborated, including Academy Award (R) winning Director of Photography Russell Boyd (Master and Commander, The Year of Living Dangerously, Gallipoli), Film Editor Lee Smith (Master and Commander, as well as The Dark Knight, for which he received an Academy Award (R) nomination), Production Designer John Stoddart (Fearless, The Mosquito Coast) and Costume Designer Wendy Stites, Oscar (R) nominated for Master and Commander and with credits on nine Weir films.
wow this movie i wanted to see, wasn't that anticipated but wanted to see it. it wasn't a masterpiece but a very good movie made very finely. it got no nominations or awards consideration. its going to be kind of underrated. when i first saw the trailer i thought that its going to be more adventure but ofcourse its Oscar nominated director Peter Weir. its a slow paced epic survival adventure story. as i said it is slow paced but very good. i liked it so much, i loved it actually. for me iits the first good movie of this year. but not extremely good, lol. Peter Weir may slightly disappoint you with this movie. it is not like anything he ever did, kind of. but this movie had a great affect on me, seeing these people battle with the harsh conditions and try to survive really made me feel how lucky i am that i did not have to do these things. this movie is very effective and it has been very long since anything of this sort has been made.
talking about performances so they are just exactly how they should be doing but not so excellent or top notch. Jim Strugess is someone whom i like very much he has this young charm to him, here he is fine, he did a nice job. he plays this kind of leader and intelligent educated guy in this movie. Ed Harris did a very good job, he plays ofcourse the senior most guy in this tribe. he is above average. Colin Farrell is not much seen but he did astonishingly good performance which is shocking. the character he plays generally makes the actors perform very naturally, his character is same to the Juliette Lewis's character in Conviction, he is not much seen but he is awsome. the most limited screen time among them exactly goes to the young girl, lol, Saoirse Ronan, i wished she should have performed well. i don't know but i did not liked her. her character was not written that well. she was just used as a screen filler. i felt like she is a last minute addition to this movie.
Direction of this movie is very good, perfect i would say. screenplay is good but could have been slight better. some minute problems are there with it. cinematography is to die for, shooting in exactly different locations from dessert to freezing snowy areas to jungles and grasslands. just outstanding, awsome photography. editing is good, art direction and costumes are fine.
well i liked this movie so much, there isn't so much in the movie all in all in places but still you get thrill and adventure which is good. the characters background are not much shown, their backdrop but still you get in their veins. this film just got one nomination, the deserved one, Best Make up, which is very good in this movie. but seriously i got effected by this movie but not emotionally. i didn't cried or got much emotional in some scenes of their sufferings. this is an epic movie with a slow paced plot. i liked it. and so will you.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
awesome
this movie is so sad but it would of won best makeup if the wolfman wasn't nominated i love this movie it is awesome!!!!
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
check out my page for more great recomendations
The good stuff
*
Messages:
The characters may be prisoners (and some of them do seem violent and dangerous), but they quickly learn to work together, help each other, and trust each other to overcome their nearly impossible challenges. There are plenty of examples of teamwork and empathy here.
*
Role models:
Main character Janusz is the strongest role model. At one point, another character warns that "kindness can kill him," but Janusz proves that he can hang onto his humanity and his kindness in the most trying of circumstances. He'll risk his own safety to help others, and his example inspires the others. Plenty of sharing and working together to overcome the odds.
What to watch out for
*
Violence:
Disturbing imagery relating to both prison and wilderness survival. Characters are starving and thirsty, exhausted and dirty. Teeth fall out, feet are bleeding and/or swollen, and characters get sunstroke. Other brief violence involves a stabbing with a knife and some blood. A character freezes to death. There's a spoken story about a main character strangling a boy.
*
Sex:
Very brief but strong sexual imagery. One of the prisoners makes drawings of naked women in various poses and trades them for supplies.
*
Language:
Language is infrequent but includes more than one use of "f--k," plus sparing use of "s--t," "d--n," and "a-s."
*
Consumerism:
Not an issue.
*
Drinking, drugs, & smoking:
Characters trade cigarettes in prison, but there's little actual smoking. In one scene, characters share a bottle of vodka around a campfire.
Was this review useful?
|
|
| Studio: | Newmarket Film Group |
| Director: | Peter Weir |
| Cast: | Colin Farrell, Ed Harris, Jim Sturgess, Saoirse Ronan |
| Genre: | Action/Adventure |
| Run time: | 133 minutes |
| Theatrical release date: | January 21, 2011 |
| DVD release date: | April 21, 2011 |
| MPAA rating: | PG-13 |
| MPAA explanation: | violent content, depiction of physical hardships, a nude image and brief strong language |
Review It
Video review
Great alternatives handpicked by our editors
Already seen it? What do you think?
More from Common Sense Media
Top advice and articles
