Movie Details
Starring
Genre
More details

The Butterfly Effect (R, 2004)

common sense media says

Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. So very bad.


parents & educators say
  • 40% say sexual content is an issue
  • 33% say violence is an issue

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie has extreme graphic violence. Characters are severely wounded and killed, including children. A character commits suicide and an animal is tortured and killed. Children are also molested (off-camera) and there are references to prison rape. The movie includes nudity and very explicit sexual references and situations, including bondage gear, prostitution, and references to multiple orgasms. Characters smoke (including children), drink, and use drugs (bong shown, character is an addict, cocaine mentioned). Characters use very strong language, including hate speech.

Positive messages: Not applicable.
Violence: Graphic violence, characters severely wounded and killed, suicide, animal torture, child molestation Characters are severely wounded and killed, including children. A character commits suicide and an animal is tortured and killed. Children are also moles
Sex: Nudity, explicit and graphic sexual references and situations including child molestation, prison rape
Language: Very strong language including hate speech
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: A lot of smoking, drinking, drug use

More on The Butterfly Effect

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about moments when they could have made a different choice and how that would have affected the lives of others around them.

What's the story?

What's the story?
In THE BUTTERFLY AFFECT, Evan is a tortured soul given to blackouts as a child. Now in college, as his memories begin to return, Evan regrets not having been able to save Kayleigh (Amy Smart), the girl he loved, from her abusive father. He realizes that can go back in time and change the direction of events, but each time he does he makes things worse. Evan goes back to the moment in which he agreed to take his clothes off for a child porn video made by Kayleigh's father (Eric Stoltz). Instead of saying no or running away or calling the police, 7-year-old Evan's second chance decision is to explain to Kayleigh's father in the words of his adult persona that her father should not destroy her life. Somehow, this instantly persuades him to stop molesting her. Then college-age Evan, back in the present but of course remembering the original reality, is transformed from cool guy to frat boy, with Kayleigh transformed from suicidal waitress to the happy sorority girl. But when 7-year-old Evan showed Kayleigh's father the error of his ways, he forgot about Kayleigh's brother, who now, in scenario #2, as the recipient of all of the abuse in the family, is over-protective of his sister. Disaster ensues and Evan has to find a way to go back again to try to make things work out better.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
This movie is not just pretentious twaddle. It is inept and pretentious twaddle, not even worth a "so bad it's good" video rental. The title comes from the idea, here attributed to "chaos theory," that the flap of a butterfly's wing can produce a typhoon half a world away. It's an irresistibly intriguing notion -- all of us have thought about what would happen if we could go back in time and make a different choice. But this movie's plot lacks imagination, insight, and even believability.

Evan's time travels include an assortment of every possible form of hideous crime and abuse, including animal torture, child molestation, the death of an infant, prison rape, and drug addiction, all unforgivably thrown in for shock value and none with any shred of dramatic legitimacy. And wherever he is, psychology teacher's pet, half-hearted participant in fraternity hazing, confined to prison, or confined to a wheelchair, Kutcher's acting is not up to the challenge of making even a nosebleed believable.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: New Line
Director: Eric Bress
Cast: Amy Smart, Eric Stoltz
Genre: Thriller
Run time: 113 minutes
Theatrical release: January 22, 2004
DVD release: July 6, 2004
MPAA Rating: R
MPAA explanation: violence, sexual content, language and brief drug use

This review was written by Nell Minow
 
 

Review It

 

Review The Butterfly Effect





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

15
Based on 15 parent & educator reviews:
  • 40% say sexual content is an issue
  • 33% say violence is an issue
  • 33% say language is an issue
  • 33% say there's too much drinking, drugs, or smoking

Most useful reviews by all members

 
see it if your 12 or older, you'll thank me, i promise

 
Was it really good or was it really bad?
I have yet to decide, but it's possible it could be both, which is why I'm giving it a neutral three stars. The first time I saw this movie I can see how to support both arguments. On one hand the acting was rancid by Kutcher, although not as terrible as CSM may make it out to be. Direction can get tedious every now and then, and it gets a bit repetitive to see Kutcher wake up in some bed with a hemorrage every time he changes something. However, the pluses were that the plot is highly intriguing and near the end little twists pop up, despite the fact that they were a bit obvious about halfway through the movie. Then again I thought "Seven"'s ending was way too obvious, which is ironic seeing as the younger characters viewed that movie within the movie. If you get into movies as I do, then you really feel sad for the main character as the movie progresses, and I admit that I partially cried at the end, since I think we can all take the result of what happened and insert it into our own lives, mainly if you have lost someone very close to you. As far as content goes, it deserves its rating from the language mostly, but there is some violence and sexual activity/dialogue present at times. I have to disagree that the movie was either dark or disturbing however, but I understand that that is all purely based on one's tolerance to subject matter in movies. So if you think the movie sounds interesting, I reccommend it with reservations, because I realize there are many bad things in the technical standpoints for the movie, but the plot was enough to draw me in.

xxHolly
teen, 15 years old
 
Interesting movie, highly troubled characters.
This movie is intriguing, if somewhat morbid, to say the least. It takes an interesting concept ("what if you could change something that happened in the past?") and runs with it, allowing the main character to try various times to change his life and the lives of his friends for the better. The overall idea behind this movie is well executed... depending on how well you can stand the sick and twisted. Major plot points (I.E. things the protagonist wishes to change) include a father molesting and producing porn films of his children and the resulting behavior of one of the abused children and the other children whom he effects, which is extremely disturbing. The main four children smoke, curse, severely injure one another, and place explosives in an innocent woman's mailbox, which ends up killing her and her baby. One of the children is particularly nasty and tries to burn the protagonist's dog to death, while another traumatized child stabs and kills that kid in a different variation of that scene. There are alternate futures where the children grow into killers, prostitutes, and asylum patients, or commit suicide. The beginning of the movie makes the main character's childhood behavior seem disturbing, when he's actually the most likable character in the film. The language and violence are pretty standard for an R-rated film, and there are several sex scenes with female nudity. I liked the movie and thought the acting was fine, but the disturbing content may offend others.

 
Excellent but EXTREMELY Disturbing
Wow. This was absolutely not for anyone under 17. Why? Well, I want you to think of the most disturbing content imaginable (pedophiles abusing children so much that they grow up only to kill and then be killed, murdering a mother and child by blowing them up, burning a dog to death, a child impaling another child, a child beating an older man, a child beating other children with a board, a father trying to suffocate his own child, suicide, arms being blown off, children going insane, a skull growing abnormally throughout the film, a pre-rape followed by two graphic stabbings, a little girl being blown up, a little boy purposely impaling his own hands, prisoners beating a newcomer, and a man beating another man to a pulp and then that man beating the attacker to death with a metal pipe; also more) and put them in this movie. Now, add graphic sex, nudity, and language and you've got Butterfly Effect. Excellent but EXTREME.

slantmaster
parent of 5 year old
 
This is appropriate for people about 12 years old and mature 10/11 year olds.

Skyrock5
teen, 16 years old
 
Mixed feelings, but good overall
Ok, no, its not for kids. When i first watched it, I went into depressed mode for the whole day and part of the next day. Its chilling, sometimes obscene, and definately, definately crazy. Its not a glance at the real world, its far from it. Its not supposed to be. Its supposed to be the truth about "The Buterfly Effect". Something small happens somewhere leads to something big happening somewhere else. I think thats the main message. That, and the fact that if something's laid out for you, you just gotta take it. No point changing it, because its there. I thought it was twisted, and it can definately make you question yourself too, but overall, the movie had a good plot, and that makes it enjoyable, or if thats not the right word to use, then at least, fast paced. All I can say is respect the age rating for this movie, which is correctly focused on 15 and up. Good movie, great actors, sad ending, ok experience.

T-Rod
teen, 16 years old
 
THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT is actually a branch of the Chaos Theory. What's the Chaos Theory...long story short, it practically says we can't predict the future. Why not? That's where THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT comes in. The Butterfly Effect states that: Because of the constant choices and every little thing we can, could, and could've done, we can't predict the future. If you breathed, "HUFF, HUFF, HUFF" WAIT!!! What if he held it? "HUFF...HUFF" Any small change can change the future in the most drastic ways. As this movie shows. This movie has good role models: "No one could possibly love anyone as much as I love you,” Evan(Ashton Kutcher) tells his true love Kayleigh(Amy Smart) sometime in the movie. And his actions largely back up the statement. He even makes the biggest sacrifice-which may also be the most heart-wrenching ending ever- in romance movie history. This movie also shows how much children need a father figure. Now, that wouldn't be much even WITHOUT the bad stuff. So imagine it WITH the bad stuff. Violence. Now, I LOVE violence not much gets me by as "brutal"(only one scene from Kick-A**-the captured, public execution scene). Not unless it's EXTREMELY intense. The scene with the dog was sick, twisted, demented and just f*cked up, pardon my French. When he hit the girl with the, what I'm guessing was a, 5"x 6" piece of wood, you hear a loud "CRACK!" I felt like I was the one who did that! The most brutal scene, though, was, I'm sad to say, my favorite violent scene. I just love comeuppances-when d-bags get whats coming to them- and I was waiting a while but when Evan started beating that guy with the titanium bat, I just loved it! Every second. I know that sounds demented and sick, but-HEY! The little twerp had it coming! He burned the dude's f-ing dog! Sexual. Nudity. Explicit sex scenes. And don't forget the whole child molestation and pedophile thing! Twisted, vile, and just plain EVIL! Like was that REALLY necessary?!?! Negative Role Models. The little evil brother is abusive, foul-mouthed, short-tempered, and just a total jerk! But it is viewed as negative. More a romance than a thriller in retrospect. The alternate ending...SUCKS NUTCRACKERS!!!!! Good movie all-in-all. I know everybody makes it seem so bad. The worst is the violence. A bunch of brutal for me, so...REALLY BAD 4 U! The nudity I hate! I have a strong moral stance against nudity! But all-in-all: breathtaking and incredible feat in motion pictures. The strangest of all? This movie is based off a children's book.

ink
teen, 15 years old
 

garden.gnome0003
teen, 16 years old
 
great!
This movie may be vulgar, swear-y, and sexual, but it gives a good glimpse into the real world. This man's paranoia and mental problems aren't completely realistic, but they show how some people go through horrible things and the choices that you make can change yours and other peoples' lives.

 
Not completely bad
This is a really good movie, I don't know why it only got one star. Sure, Ashton wasn't the best choice, but he didn't do a bad job either. Also, be sure your kids aren't around. Lots of violence and language. Animal torture and child porn. E*

kassidywhite11
teen, 17 years old
 
xcfh

 
Must See
I saw this movie when i was 14 and it is still one of my favorites.

 
This movie is as original as it gets!
No offense, but how could you not appreciate this movie? How can you so this movie is so bad its good? I can't believe it! This movie has stuck with me since it came out in theaters years ago. Brilliant storyline, brilliant acting (surprisingly), and AN ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT ENDING!!! THE ENDING WAS AMAZING!!! I ALMOST CRIED!!! The movie was fast paced and wonderful. This movie is down right dark, with disturbing violence and sexual themes. I remember I was I think 12 or 13 when I saw it with a friend and my Mom, and we considered walking out after a kid burned a dog alive. But I'm glad we stayed, because the movie is better as a whole, and the ending completes it so perfectly. You can't go wrong here.

LoveMovies
teen, 16 years old
 
I love this movie.
How can you say this isnt appropraite for kids?!! This is one of my favourite films in the whole wide world I watched it when I was thirteen and wasnt affected by it all. It's just such a good movie and depriving your child of seeing this would just be wrong. - appropriate for 13 and up :)

 
It had potential
The story had such potential, the ending was actually excellent but inbetween something happened. There was dark, disturbing scenes of just about every evil thing you can imagine. The acting was superb but left me with a yucky feeling inside.

TheKidInTheRye
teen, 17 years old
 
Great Movie!
This used to be my favorite movie (Then came Cloverfield) and i have to say that i was 12 when i watched this. I didn't get the urge to go do drugs or have sex or anything. Its a movie and parents need to understand that a movie IS A MOVIE. Overall its a great movie and very original with its plot i highly recommend it.

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see The Butterfly Effect?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age