it taught me not to prejudice. Dana watched that at age 13.
Full Frontal
-
Is it age appropriate?
About our ratings -
Is it any good?
-
Common Sense says
Some vivid moments, but overall, just so-so.
Why We Rated This
for Ages 17–18
What to watch out for
-
Violence:
-
Sex:
-
Language:
-
Consumerism:
-
Drinking, drugs, & smoking:
What Parents Need to Know
This review of Full Frontal was written by Nell Minow
Parents need to know that as the title indicates, this movie includes explicit nudity, explicit and varied sexual references and situations, and very strong language. A character dies, apparently from auto-erotic asphyxiation. Characters drink and smoke and eat hash brownies. There are tense emotional scenes. Parents may want to see the film themselves before deciding whether it's appropriate for teen viewing.
Families Can Talk About
- Families can talk about why Soderburgh told the story this way and what a movie they would make with their friends and families would be like.
More on Full Frontal
What’s the Story?
Is It Any Good?
The movie has many wonderful moments and many marvelous lines. But it does not have the improvisational brilliance of the Christopher Guest movies and comes off more like an actor's studio workshop than a film. The whole is less than the sum of its parts, but some of those parts are remarkably vivid and intriguing.
Movie Details
Run time: 101 minutes
Theatrical release: 8/2/2002, DVD release: 2/11/2003
MPAA Rating: R for very explicit sexual situations, drug use, strong language
Our Members Say
Most Recent Reviews
-
Lives in GeorgiaKids ages: 7, 13, 14, 15, 15, 16I rate this title iffy for age 17 and give it- My concerns are:
- Excessive violence
- Inappropriate sexual content
- Inappropriate language
- Negative role models
- My highlights are:
- Good role models
ok

Become a member and get recommendations from other parents based on your child's age.

