Rear Window

  • Review Date: April 9, 2007
  • PG
  • Genre: Thriller
  • 1954
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Hitchcock masterpiece stars peeping Jimmy Stewart.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that the theme of this classic, besides a neat little murder mystery, is voyeurism -- spying on peoples' private lives, customarily without their knowledge. Alfred Hitchcock depicted this tastefully, within the restrictions of the old Hollywood studio censorship code (unlike later R-rated movies like Sliver, Blue Velvet, or Hollow Man, in which guys watching in secret got the full eyeful of sex, nudity, and explicit perversion), and in some Canadian territories this got a "G" rating. Still, the viewer is made to take the POV of a character who likes to watch things he's not supposed to see. While suspenseful, the plotline is necessarily low on action (unlike other Hitchcock masterworks like North By Northwest and The Birds), but a pet dog is killed offscreen. You might tell kids this was the direct inspiration for the 2007 teen-bait thriller Disturbia.

  • There is the notion of the "peeping Tom" inherent in the hero's behavior here. Even though his violating his neighbors' privacy cracks a murder case, does that excuse his scrutiny of them all the time? If it were an edgier actor besides James Stewart, usually cast as an embodiment of boyish decency, this character would be a little creepy.
  • A minor scuffle. Some discussion of dismemberment and murder, including a small dog killed offscreen.
  • Though it's kept within the Hollywood censorship code, most of the people Jeff spies on are interesting because of their romantic lives (or lack of them). One of a newlywed couple, who (it's strongly hinted) are having sex constantly and -- for the husband -- exhaustively. Another target is a sexy ballerina often watched doing her exercises.

What's the story?

Jeff (James Stewart), a photojournalist, is confined to a wheelchair after breaking his leg shooting a car race. Now he recuperates in his Greenwich Village flat, getting occasional visits from his gorgeous model-girlfriend Lisa (Grace Kelly) and putting up with a visiting nurse. Bored by immobility and equipped with an arsenal of binoculars and telephoto SLR lenses within reach, Jeff amuses himself by spying on his neighbors across the courtyard, from his rear window. Jeff finds that each tenant, some lonely, some oversexed, embodies a different pathology of male-female relationships. At first it's funny to Jeff, seeing a newlywed woman wearing down her husband with frequent lovemaking and a solitary bachelorette going dateless night after night. But then there's a burly guy named Lars (Perry Mason's Raymond Burr), unhappily married to a nag. Jeff becomes convinced that Lars has just snapped and murdered his wife, then possibly dismembered her body in packing cases. But is Jeff correct? And how can he convince someone? And what if the menacing Lars discovers he's been watched?


Is it any good?

 

Whole college courses have centered around Alfred Hitchcock's fiendish, compact, and sometimes lighthearted REAR WINDOW. The tension gets so exquisite that viewers unaware of this film's reputation might almost miss the cinematic gimmick that made Rear Window quite an achievement: it never leaves Jeff's room. Not once. The POV outside Jeff's rear window into the other windows is like looking into an array of TV screens (or comic-strip panels), the little New York stories unfolding in each one, often simultaneously (and, yes, that's Ross Bagdassarian, creator of the cartoon characters Alvin & the Chipmunks, as a songwriter).

Throughout his career James Stewart was an a boyishly all-American good guy, though there were a few exceptions, and Hitchcock especially likes to tap into an inner darkness using the wholesome actor. Though he's partially a victim of his disability, Jeff does seem to enjoy being what could be called a "peeping Tom," and there's a question of whether his new pastime of voyeurism is a healthy one or not -- never mind the crime-solving fringe benefits -- and what's the deal with him enjoying looking at strangers, but avoiding intimacy with the beautiful, accommodating Lisa? If wanting to watch makes Jeff some sort of pervert, what does that make us, the audience? We're watching him -- watching them!


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about the alienation of urban life, about people living on top of one another in high-rises, yet remaining strangers. Jeff and his motivations are a big part of this movie's intrigue. As a photographer, he has to compose images for a living. When his broken leg means he can't do his job, can he be excused for continuing to habitually watch ordinary people? How do TV, Web sites, video blogs, and especially reality TV add to the movie's theme about the ethics of scrutinizing real people for entertainment?


This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
Kid, 12 years old
September 9, 2009
 
GO ALFRED
YOU ROCK I KNOW YR DEAD BUT YOU STILL ROCK AND I LOVE YOUR MOVIES AND THIS IS ONE OF YR BEST YET YOU RULE (THROWS CONFETTI FOR ALFRED HITCHCOCK)THE SUSPENSE IN THIS MOVIE WAS GREAT THE ACTORS ARE AWESOME TOO (GRACE KELLY!)THIS MOVIE RRRRRROCKS

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
December 27, 2009
 
One of the best movies ever. OK for older kids.
I saw Rear Window when I was about 10, and even though it scared me a little, I absolutely loved it. This still remains one of my favorite movies - nail-biting suspense, plenty of quirky Hitchcockian details, and charming characters. A masterpiece!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
May 14, 2010
 
awesome
It was good

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
August 15, 2009
 
Alfred Hitchcock does it again!
Rear Window is my new favorite movie! I was literally on the edge of my seat watching this. But not for kids- all the suspense. Plus a little dog is strangled which I thought was so sad.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
July 4, 2011
 
Voyaristic Classic!!!
This masterpiece shows Hitchcock's amazing talent of creating great romance, mystery, comedy, and suspense. Everything about this film is just so wonderfully planned and created, the actors were chosen perfectly, and the way Hitchcock brings us into the film and makes us peeping toms like Stewart (which is how the film gets so suspenseful) is amazing. Also, watch the commentary and making of the film feature, you will learn so much amazing facts about the film! Now go watch the film, and see if you can solve the mystery before Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly!

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 12 years old
February 6, 2011
 
MUST - WATCH
Wonderful movie, though the concept of spying on neighbors and murder might be a little much. My little sis (7) was a little bored at the beginning. She was waiting for the murder mystery part. I enjoyed every second of it. (She did too)

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2009
 
The greatest psychological thriller of all time!
This film is another famous Hitchcock thriller, but this time it is psychological! This movie is brilliant from beginning to end and all is mild in this film with G language, mild discussion of the murder, and the murderer attempts to subdue Jimmy Stewart but fails. Over all this should be ratede G and for 10 and up.

Flag as inappropriate 
Parent of 15 year old
February 25, 2009
 
A Thrilling and Old-Fashoined Thriller!
If your kids want to see a cool thriller, but you are cautious around big-budget slasher flicks, rent this from Blockbuster and watch it together on a Friday night. Everyone will enjoy themselves, and you won't have to worry about what they're seeing, as this film has little sex, language, and no violence. Language consists of some "hells" and few "d**n"s. There is some playful sexual innuendo between Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly (it isn't exactly beating around the bush, but it isn't vulgar at all) that runs along the lines of her spending the night and there only being one bed. A beautiful ballerina exercises in her underwear, and a man attempts to force himself on an unnamed girl (it appears to be more of an embrace gone too far than an attempted rape).

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 18 years old
April 13, 2009
 
Besides Notorious, this is my favorite Hitchcock film.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
This is a masterpiece, and my favorite film of all time. It's a rare type of film that manages to be unbearably suspenseful and fascinating using a minimum of sex and violence, which is quite refreshing. It's an absolutely amazing movie that perfectly blends thrills, romance, and even touches of comedy...a must-see. Good for kids 10+

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
Studio:Universal Studios Home Entertainment
Director:Alfred Hitchcock
Cast:Grace Kelly, James Stewart, Wendell Corey
Genre:Thriller
Run time:112 minutes
Theatrical release date:August 1, 1954
DVD release date:March 6, 2001
MPAA rating:PG

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Rear Window?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it