Recount

  • Review Date: August 30, 2008
  • NR
  • Genre: Drama
  • 2008
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Talky, smart docu-drama about 2000 presidential mess.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

Not yet rated

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that there is abundant profanity and a vulgar dialog reference to the sex scandal involving former President Bill Clinton. The cast of characters is split between Democrats and Republicans, with the script suggesting (but not as shrilly as documentaries like Fahrenheit 9/11 did) that the Republicans used thug tactics, smears, and cronyism to unfairly win the 2000 presidency (although some of the dialog refers to Democrats behaving just as unethically to "steal" past elections). There is also some social drinking.

  • While some characters, such as Warren Christopher and James Baker, seem more gentlemanly (and less profane) than others, each character, Democrat or Republican, seems to believe he or she is doing the proper thing, fighting in court to get the "rightful" president in office. Ron Klaim, who initially feels resentful against the Al Gore team for ousting him, regains his sense of party loyalty. The overtly religious (and Republican) Katherine Harris, who thinks her part in all this is the work of God, may look a little ridiculous, and there is a sense that the Republicans here stooped to dirty tricks (like organizing violent mobs of demonstrators) more so than the Democrats, even though their dialog refers to episodes in history when the Democratic Party got away with "stealing" elections.
  • Scuffling in a protest-riot.
  • Crude verbal reference to President Bill Clinton's oral-sex scandal.
  • "S--t" and frequent use of "f--k" -- so much so that one character is scolded for it (not that it changes him much).
  • Mainly the names of major news channels and media agencies.
  • Social drinking and smoking.

What's the story?

This HBO movie is based on actual events and people involved in the bizarre climax of the 2000 presidential contest between Democrat Al Gore and Republican George W. Bush, a verrrry narrow race in which thousands of crucial but botched votes from several counties in Florida were never conclusively tallied. On election day night, Gore is on the verge of conceding victory to Bush when Democratic campaign advisor Ron Klaim (Kevin Spacey) realizes that the error factor makes the vote too close to call. The Democrats file lawsuit after lawsuit demanding that the election be put on hold while a painstaking hand recount of each ballot take place -- considering the poorly designed punch cards, the faulty ballot machines in some urban (Democrat) neighborhoods, and the senior citizens who confusedly voted for the wrong candidate. The Republicans, meanwhile, want to stand by the early polls making Bush the clear winner. With growing impatience and anger, they see the whole controversy as the desperate Democrats trying to disqualify votes and steal the White House on technicalities.


Is it any good?

 

Bush and Gore are only on the margins of this saga, with starring roles instead given to the personalities of campaign strategists and the quirks of a too-fallible election system and temperaments poorly designed to handle near-tie votes. How much you enjoy RECOUNT probably depends on what you thought of the Bush election and presidency (guess it's no "spoiler" that he won). If you consider it a shame, this is a scorching expose on What Went Wrong. If you think the Bush Administration the best thing ever, devoting nearly two hours to the fraught election may seem pointless and liberal-biased -- given that the Democrats come across as underdogs, and there is a what-if tone of regret that the recount did not proceed the way they wanted.

Compared to Bush-bashing documentaries such as Fahrenheit 911 and Unprecedented (which practically convict the GOP of racketeering), this scripted version is relatively fair and sympathetic to both ends. On a personal level, the focus is on Ron Klaim's conversion -- from disappointment over his earlier ouster from his job with the Democrats to a fighter with a renewed zeal to get his candidate in office. In the end we learn that the Republican's front man, James Baker (Tom Wilkinson), isn't very different, as he also harbors emotional loyalty to Bush, separate and distinct from dishonorable concerns of power, ideology, oil, or money.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about the characters and their motivations. Do you think this drama is unfair to one side or the other in the Bush-Gore rivalry, or does it "tell it like it is"? Do viewers feel any differently about the George W. Bush presidency after this film?


This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
Studio:HBO
Director:Jay Roach
Cast:Bob Balaban, John Hurt, Laura Dern
Genre:Drama
Run time:116 minutes
Theatrical release date:May 25, 2008
DVD release date:August 19, 2008
MPAA rating:NR

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Recount?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it