Shutter

  • Review Date: March 17, 2008
  • PG-13
  • Genre: Horror
  • 2008
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Bad script, so-so scares mar Asian horror remake.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this horror movie includes some graphic violence, including the bloody effects of a ghost's assaults on victims. There's also a jarring car accident; a leap from a balcony that has a hard, bloody ending on the sidewalk; and a camera eyepiece that pierces a character's eye. The ghost appears repeatedly in shadows and scares people. A sexual assault appears in photos and a flashback scene. The movie also includes some sexual imagery, showing women in bras and panties, as well as naked backs. There's some language and drinking, and a scene shows men agreeing to put a date-rape drug in a woman's wine.

  • A grumpy husband yells at his wife; a ghost haunts several people; characters lie and commit violent acts.
  • Car accident early in the film shows victim slammed by vehicle and tumbling under the wheels, and the car screeching and crashing into a tree. Repeated tense scenes in dark hallways or rooms; several jump scenes in which a ghost, shadow, or person appears unexpectedly. In the darkroom, Ben splashes a chemical on his face and hallucinates blood all over his eyes and face. A camera eyepiece explodes into a photographer's eye, leaving him dead (bloody face in close-up). A man leaps from a balcony with a thud (close-up of a bloody head/eye). Ghost sticks ugly long tongue in Ben's mouth; he gags and coughs and appears to suffocate. Photos show sexual assault on a woman. Man electrocutes himself.
  • Newlyweds kiss and embrace passionately, then the wife suggests they "get this thing consummated," though nothing is shown. Some bra-and-panties shots of women -- one straddling a man, another posing for pictures. Ghost climbs into bed with Ben and pulls her dress over her head, showing her back, which is decomposed and gross.
  • One use of "f--k," plus other profanity, including "s--t" and "goddammit."
  • Mac laptops; neon signs in Tokyo show various brand names.
  • Characters drink champagne, wine, beer. Men put date-rape drug in a woman's drink.

What's the story?

Bad things always seem to happen to unsuspecting blonde girls when they head East in remakes of Asian Extreme horror movies. SHUTTER -- a remake of a 2004 Thai movie -- is no exception, focusing on the haunting of Jane (Rachael Taylor) by a young Japanese woman's ghost. At first Jane thinks she killed Megumi (Megumi Okina) when she hit her with a car, but she can't convince her photographer husband, Ben (Joshua Jackson), that the accident even happened. It's a rough start to their honeymoon in Tokyo; soon Jane -- a plucky American feeling alienated in the city's crowded streets and neon signage -- starts investigating on her own. And when white blurs start appearing in Ben's photos, Jane researches "spirit photos," which an expert tells her show "strong emotions making themselves heard."


Is it any good?

 

Shifting the location to Tokyo and setting Caucasian stars against a Japanese ghost (the original features all Thai characters) changes the movie's haunting dynamic. On one level it's yet another instance of a white woman stalked by a vengeful Asian ghost. But on another, as Jane comes to understand the reasons for Megumi's anger, the women realize a shared grievance premised on gender imbalance and sexual abuses. It's hardly revolutionary for a scary movie to have a Caucasian woman wandering frightened through Tokyo, harassed by some supernatural phenomenon. But Shutter is almost perversely upfront in connecting privileged, self-justifying Caucasian men with the problem at its core.

And yet, despite this potential complexity, the movie lapses repeatedly into tired conventions. The "scares" are bloody but not very clever, the plot increasingly silly. In part this is a function of lapses in the script, as explanatory scenes pop up in strange places and a voiceover fills in for scenes missing altogether. Jane's plucky resilience makes her sympathetic, and when at last she literally leaves the movie before its end, you admire her sudden good judgment and wish her well.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about how this movie is similar to and different from other horror films based on Asian originals. What do these movies tend to have in common? What makes this one different? Families can also discuss how the movie uses both technology and legends to create suspense.


This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Kid, 14 years old
September 20, 2010
 
Good!
I usually don't like the asian remakes. I liked the Ring and The Ring Two, but the rest of them I didn't like. I didn't know if I was going to like this movie or not so I bought it and it was surprisingly very good! I definitely beat out all of my expectation! I wasn't bored for a second of it! mIt was really good! PS. The ending was amazing!!!!

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
October 14, 2009
 
Just plain bad
Really bad American remake that totally gives the original a bad name. I am sick of this watered-down PG-13 crap that America is spewing out these days, where is the real horror? This movie contains like one "f" word and some violence, and also a non-graphic sex scene. If you want to see something scary, watch the original.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 14 years old
July 20, 2009
 
14A-Disturbing Content, Not Reccomended for Children, language= bad horror movie
This is one of those movies that are very low on scares, boring, and act like a sleeping pill.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
May 9, 2011
 
terrible
i think nobody should watch it personally the storyline is a bit off and it's not scary considering the sexual parts...not that bad but still probably not the best for young kids laughing my head off as i watched it

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
August 20, 2009
 
Perfect for 13 or older
This is a great horror movie for anyone who likes Japanese remake films. It had some stuff, leading up to sex, that would be uncomfortrble to watch with my mom, but it really was an amazing movie with great special effects. It reminded me of the uninvited and a toned-down version of the grudge.

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 15 years old
June 9, 2010
 
Older Kids!
I really like it! Really is a good spoke!

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
March 19, 2011
 
don't get the thai version
this movie is really scary but don't get the thai version because you have to read the headings and the movie is so interesting that you don't want to read the headings

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 16 years old
March 7, 2011
 
i liked this movie.it wasn't gorey but it was still scary.it really keeps you watching.its really good

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 13 years old
July 27, 2010
 
This was a good thriller. However there is one non explict sex scene and one part where the ghost takes her shirt off. Overall if you let your kids see men jumping off buldings, bugs coming out of peoples mouths, ghosts, and a man electrocuting his self (unrated version) then there's nothing to worry about but if you do then this is not for your kids. PG-13: 11+ unrated: 13+

Flag as inappropriate 
Kid, 11 years old
July 21, 2010
 
If you don't like ghosts...This isn't the movie for you
Very enjoyable Thriller, However not good for kids. Unless you don't mind you kids seeing pictures of ghost and men being thrown out winds and worm like creatures coming out of a dudes mouth, then I recommend watching it.

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
Studio:Twentieth Century Fox
Director:Masayuki Ochiai
Cast:Joshua Jackson, Megumi Okina, Rachael Taylor
Genre:Horror
Run time:85 minutes
Theatrical release date:March 21, 2008
DVD release date:July 14, 2008
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:terror, disturbing images, sexual content and language.

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.

Video review


About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Shutter?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it