Underworld: Evolution (R, 2006)

common sense media says

Hyper-violent and absolutely not for kids.


parents & educators say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this film features incessant, stylized, and graphic violence. Modes of death and injury include decapitation, disembowelment, dismemberment, piercing, crossbowing, impaling, chopping, and shooting, as well as slamming with trucks and jeeps, massive fiery explosions, biting and ripping with fangs, digging into chest cavities, and penetrating limbs, torsos, and heads with spearlike wingtips. Motivations include vengeance and power-madness. Selene uses a truck to slam a vampire into a mountainside repeatedly, a chopper with whirring blades serves to splatter a villain excessively. A sex scene features slow motion naked bodies in softlit profile. Some drinking in a tavern, some blood-drinking in a wineglass, smoking in the background of a couple of scenes; one scene features explicit vomiting. Characters curse occasionally ("hell," s-word, and f-word, one rendered in subtitle).

Positive messages: Vampires and werewolves hate and destroy each other; one power-mad, hugely strong and winged vampire wants to run the world.
Violence: Repeated fight and battle scenes; injuries include bites, decapitation, dismemberment, disembowelment, chests ripped open, bodies thrown against walls/trees, bodies pierced, shredded, and shot; weapons include crossbows, spears, axes, automatic guns, hands with claws for fingernails, and vehicles.
Sex: Sex scene includes naked bodies in profile, closeups of impassioned, beautifully lit faces.
Language: Several uses of s-word; two f-words (one in subtitle).
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Brief drinking in tavern; one vampire drinks blood in a wine glass; some smoking by supporting characters.

More on Underworld: Evolution

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about the film's representation of race differences. If the vampires and lycans are descended from the same father, as revealed in this film's mythology, their centuries-long battle seems especially tragic and futile. How might the hybrid characters -- both the werewolf/vampire mix Michael and the new breed Selene becomes -- hold a hope for a future not premised on race-warring? And how does the franchise simultaneously depend on fight imagery: blood, body parts, stomach-churning violence?

What's the story?

What's the story?
In this sequel, Death Dealer Selene (Kate Beckinsale) is still trussed up in black latex and still icy-eyed mad at her lot in life. With her vampire/werewolf hybrid boyfriend Michael (Scott Speedman), she seeks information and weapons to use against the vampires who are bound to come after them, since she killed head vampire in charge Viktor (Bill Nighy) at the end of the first film. Currently in charge of evilness is Alexander Corvinus (Derek Jacobi), who directs his S.W.A.T.-style team from aboard a hyper-teched-out ship. Corvinus is looking for Selene and a key and his sons, William the werewolf (Brian Steele) and Marcus the vampire (Tony Curran). The brothers were bitten by different creatures and so became the first of each race, instantly deemed enemies forever. William's imprisonment "for all time" upsets Marcus, who vows to save him when he is himself released from a tomb. To achieve this end, Marcus needs Selene, who has a "blood memory" of the location of the brother's sarcophagus. The film is primarily comprised of fight scenes, almost all initiated by Marcus, who flies around with gnarly bat-wings and spikes his victims against walls.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 
Stylized and extraordinarily violent, UNDERWORLD: EVOLUTION repeats the formula of the first film. Nothing that happens this time will surprise anyone. Except, perhaps, the fact that Derek Jacobi has agreed to play the oldest immortal ever. Selene and Michael again try to sort out their identities, and Marcus tries to reunite with wolfy William in order to run the world. Why is not quite clear.

More interesting and never quite examined is the notion of "infectious" race. The vampires see the werewolves as odious for just this reason -- anyone they bite becomes a werewolf. And yet, the vampires are in the same sort of boat. Their similarity is vaguely instructive, races generally being cultural and political concoctions, their myths and backstories functions of power-grabbing and territorial squabbling. But their infectiousness provides the possibility for provocation and perception: race here is not inherent or stable or a means of fixed identity. It is mutable and mutating. All the generic, frankly tiresome bloody war stuff in Underworld: Evolution doesn't quite obliterate this insight.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: Screen Gems
Director: Len Wiseman
Cast: Bill Nighy, Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman
Genre: Horror
Run time: 105 minutes
Theatrical release: January 20, 2006
DVD release: June 6, 2006
MPAA Rating: R
MPAA explanation: pervasive strong violence and gore, some sexuality/nudity and language.

This review was written by Cynthia Fuchs
 
 

Review It

 

Review Underworld: Evolution





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

What parents & educators say

14

Most useful reviews by all members

 
.
No way should anyone under 17 even be allowed to watch it.

 
Really sick!!!
Sick and gross!!! People getting decapitated, losing limbs, getting gashed, and bleeding profusely. Lots of nudity, including a three-way, lots of language. I'm sorry I went.

lilmisspj4u2
teen, 17 years old
 
luved it
luved it

 
its not bad
good movie, if youre a vampire/werewolf/horror/action fan, u might like it

bhoot
teen, 15 years old
 
Its good for twentees
well i think you should not talk about sexuality in this film. Because most of the hollywood films now a days have sexual scenes.

meemz4395
teen, 16 years old
 
MAN UP
Like I said man up a bit, dont have your 4 year old watch it..duhhhhh...if 14 years olds watch it, well, we've all had the talk and know whats going on..stop skweeking and just watch it like an adult...I do.

 
NOT FOR 15 OR UNDER!!
This movie almost got an NC-17(that's one rating below X) rating for violence. Every violent action you can probably name happens in this movie! The sex scene wasn't too bad (comparing it to American Pie or Love Actually) Language was pretty strong, but that usually isn't a big issue for kids in Jr. High or High School. If parents are considering letting their kids see this movie, have them watch the other one first. It was much less violent, gory, and provacative.

Mr. Boxbox
parent of 16 year old
 
Brilliant action/adventure/fantasy film. Lots of non stop gory action violence, more than the first one. Although gory and strong, the violence is very fast paced, and is set in dark settings, so the blood is black and graphic detail is hard to see. Has two mildly explicit sex scenes. Great action flick for teens.

Mangareader101
teen, 16 years old
 
Dont forget what kind of movie this is!
My lord! People! This movie had vilence, but it wasnt anything I havent seen already in other movies. ITS A VAMPIRE AND WEREWOLF/LYCAN MOVIE. its gonna have blood. the language wasnt anything I havent heard too. Very good and I highly recomend it.

antoineisthebest
teen, 15 years old
 
people are wrong to said that movie is 17 year old
some gory scene and some sexual content but that's it I saw it when I was 9 my brother saw it when he was 6 when people said that's for 17 years old there wrong

Dman
teen, 17 years old
 
Not as good as the first
Not half as well done as the original, but a great plot line and a must see for anyone who was a fan of the first. Any kid mature enough to enjoy this movie is gonna know when he shouldn't be looking at the screen.

 
Good, but not as good as the first...
I loved this movie, mainly because I'm a fan of vampires and horror fiction, but it still wasn't as good as the first. The graphics and CG are better, but plot-wise it's a bit slow and mainly supported by blood, gore, and monster chases. That happens to be something I like in a movie of this genre, but I'd not recommend it to anyone under 14 years of age. As for the sex scene, it's a bit intense. It's rather easy to tell that it's fake, though, due to positioning of the bodies - but younger kids likely wouldn't know that. And even then, the sex scene actually made me feel a bit iffy when I was watching it with a friend: Awkward moment. Overall, though, it's a good movie for a sequel but makes very little sense as a stand-alone.

JamesRobertson
parent of and 7 , 11 , 14 , 17 year old
 

cerealkiller189
teen, 13 years old
 
SO DARN VIOLENT!!!!
Yes,well,but it dosent deserve a not for kids.I watched it with my 10 yr old brother and dad and my brother didn get nightmares.

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see Underworld: Evolution?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age