Young Sherlock Holmes (PG-13, 1985)

common sense media says

Exquisite idea, mediocre result, but OK for older kids.


parents & educators say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that perils in this young-adult Sherlock Holmes drama include threats of the heroine being sacrificially turned into an Egyptian-style mummy, and kids being strangled and run through with swords. There's some potential nightmare imagery for young viewers -- scenes of demonic entities and rotting zombies; it's made clear that these are only hallucinations, but the chills are still vividly rendered. Young Watson tries tobacco smoking.

Positive messages: Holmes is ever polite and fearless seeker of justice (even though it harmed
his own family; only the sketchiest details given). He and Watson (who
overeats and tries to smoke a pipe) are shown to be consistently smarter than the
adults, who are either oblivious (especially Lestrade of Scotland Yard) or
treacherous villains in disguise. The "exotic" depiction of Arab-Egyptian
culture (emphasis on the "cult" part) is pretty cartoony.
Violence: More PG than PG-13. One fatal shooting. Characters "mummified" non-explicitly
by hot wax. Mild wounds from sword-thrusts. Hand-to-hand fighting,
strangulation. Bloodless, hallucination-inspired mayhem and death include one
character who stabs himself in the chest, another getting run over by a
carriage, another besieged by rotting skeletons, another imagining little
monsters pecking and biting at him.
Sex: Not applicable.
Language: "Hell" and "damn," just about one time each.
Consumerism: Not applicable.
Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Pipe-smoking by the young Watson and Holmes. Social drinking (but not by
underage characters).

More on Young Sherlock Holmes

What to talk about

Talk to your kids
Families can talk about the idea of Sherlock Holmes as a boy. How well is it done here? This movie suggests that Holmes' intellect and penchant for crime-solving backfired -- when he busted his own father for some unspecified offense. Is being this brilliant a help or a hindrance for a kid? You might compare Young Sherlock Holmes to other stories that portray youthful mystery-solvers, including the "Encyclopedia Brown" series, and Eye of the Crow, Death in the Air, and other recent YA novels by Shane Peacock that try to depict (in far more depth than this film) the troubled childhood of Conan Doyle's great sleuth.

What's the story?

What's the story?
In a boys' school in Victorian-era England, two students encounter each other who are destined to be illustrious crimefighting partners in adulthood, the teenage Sherlock Holmes (Nicholas Rowe), who is already a genius at logical deduction, and the pudgy adolescent James Watson. Holmes' braininess is renown among the kids and faculty, but that only makes him an easier target when a resentful classmate frames Holmes for cheating on an exam. Meanwhile, a number of aged London men have been dying under weird circumstances, in hysterics from occultish hallucinations. When this bizarre curse strikes the school's retired headmaster, Holmes sneaks back onto the grounds and prowl's London's dark corners to solve the mystery, with Watson's assistance.

Is it any good?

Is it any good?
 

YOUNG SHERLOCK HOLMES came out under the auspices of Steven Spielberg's production company, when other Hollywood directors were signing on to do Spielberg-like fantasies with the finest possible casts, imagination, and special effects. The title alone suggested a can't-miss property. And yet for all the high hopes, Young Sherlock Holmes unfurls disappointingly, like old Indiana Jones. Yes, there's an elementary change in scenery and accents, but the cliffhanger stunts, cartoonish foreigners, black-magic stuff (all the more inconsequential because we find out it's all delusions), ludicrous temple-of-doom that, just like the Death Star, comes complete with a convenient self-destruct mode -- it doesn't take a you-know-who to deduce it was all swiped from other Lucas-Spielberg 1980s blockbusters.

Scriptwriter Chris Columbus was later to make the first few Harry Potter movies, and the early school scenes (complete with a Draco Malfoy-lookalike antagonist) do have a nice flavor and potential, before the hand-me-down thrill rides and the way-silly revenge scheme at the center of the mystery take over. Young Sherlock Holmes not an awful movie; it just should have been so much better. Case closed.

Movie themes & details

Movie Details
Studio: Paramount Pictures
Director: Barry Levinson
Cast: Alan Cox, Nicholas Rowe, Sophie Ward
Genre: Thriller
Run time: 118 minutes
Theatrical release: December 5, 1985
DVD release: December 2, 2003
MPAA Rating: PG-13

This review was written by Charles Cassady Jr.
 
 

Review It

 

Review Young Sherlock Holmes





Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
 

Most useful reviews by all members

ocie14
teen, 14 years old
 
uggh
my mom made the mistake of showing this movie to me (12), and my two brothers (6 and 14). They were both scared. some scenes, like the mummifaction ceremony, are truly disturbing. also, i did not like it when the priest was killed. plus, it wasnt even a good movie. there are much better ones out there. not reccommended

 
My friends child (12) loved this movie! He's very into Sherlock Holmes and enjoyed this movie immensely! I recommend it for boys age 11-14.

Ricochet94
teen, 17 years old
 
Excellent prequel to the Sherlock Holmes stories, I thought this was carried out far better than the new Holmes. (Even though I did enjoy the new one.) It is also noticeably more violent than the new one, in spite of it's younger cast; women are sacrificed alive to an evil cult, people go crazy and have nightmares about things coming to life and attacking them, people die rather graphic deaths, etc.

TheBookWorm101
kid, 13 years old
 
Great Movie!
Its a great movie! I would reccomend it only for people that LOVE mystery/scary/adventure movies because this one has it all. The story is great but it may be scary to kids under the age of 11 or 10. Great movie!

An independent voice for families
Age-appropriate reviews
 

vote now

Will you see Young Sherlock Holmes?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors


About our rating system
ON: Content is appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child, some content may not be right for some kids
OFF: Not age appropriate for kids this age