Smash Lab

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Crashing and bashing in the name of science.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

Not yet rated

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this interesting series -- which focuses on reworking existing technology in order to provide better products intended to protect people -- tests new inventions in large-scale simulations that usually require crashing and blowing up cars or other vehicles in a protected environment. The experiments sometimes fail, but the failures are looked at as stepping stones in the overall design and engineering process. The show will most likely appeal to older tweens and teens who are either a) interested in science or b) like to watch things get smashed up in a big way. Kids (especially teens of driving age) may need to be reminded not to engage in such activities themselves.

  • The series demonstrates how existing technology can be reinvented to create new innovations designed to make people's lives safer. The team is Caucasian; Deanne is the only female.
  • Close up images and replays of cars crashing into barriers at top speed, explosions, and other large-scale events. These moments aren't gratuitous, but are part of the show's scientific experiments.
  • Not applicable.

What's the story?

In SMASH LAB, scientist Deanne Bell, industrial designer Nick Blair, and mechanical engineers Chuck Messer and Kevin Cook rework scientific formulas, generate computer graphics, and apply various manual techniques in order to reinvent existing technological inventions. Their goal? Producing even better ways to help people survive potentially life-threatening events. By reworking and reformulating innovations like aerated concrete (used on airport runways to slow planes down), bullet-proof materials, and truck dampers, they create technology that, in turn, can be used to produce inventions that could potentially save the lives of people involved in car crashes, aircraft bombings, and earthquakes. The gang tests their inventions in large-scale simulations in which cars are purposely crashed at top speed, vehicles are blown up, and earthquakes are replicated.


Is it any good?

 

When talking to each other, the gang shares simplified explanations of the scientific and mechanical engineering theories they're working with. But despite these somewhat rehearsed moments, they're extremely enthusiastic about their experiments. The show even has some dramatic moments when each invention is put to the test. And when some experiments fail, the group remains excited about reworking the concepts in order to come up with a technological breakthrough that will work.

The series' focus on design and engineering might be a turn off for many kids. But the crashes, explosions, and other major destructive moments conducted in the name of research might be a selling point for some older tweens and teens who normally wouldn't be interested in the sciences. They may not pick up a lot of scientific theory, but they'll definitely see that successfully developing new technology is the result of both good ideas and being willing to learn from every failure.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about how scientists and engineers create new technological innovations. How often do they fail before producing something that works? What can other people learn from that? Families can also discuss how television can promote science and learning. What did you learn from this show that you didn't know before? Are educational shows exciting and fun to watch? Why or why not?


This review was written by Melissa Camacho
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
Makes JackAss the movie look tame.
Our kids have enough irresponsibility demonstrated today. They do not need it showcased in the name of "science." The stunts do not have any redeeming value. They have no science value and perpetuate the idea that you can do stupid stunts and get away with it. There are plenty of opportunities missed that could showcase the value of sound research and planning. This show is all about shock value and lame trailers trying to promote a lame show. Smash Lab at its best could not match MythBusters at its worst.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Melissa Camacho
TV rating:TV-PG
Network:Discovery Channel
Cast:Chuck Messer, Deanne Bell, Nick Blair
Genre:Educational

This review was written by Melissa Camacho
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Smash Lab?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it