 | ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids. |
 | OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age. |
That's Impossible
- History
- Genre: Educational
Common Sense Media says
Show about unlikely scientific advances is repetitive, thin.
Parents say
Kids say
What parents need to know
Parents need to know that this educational series about the thin line between cutting-edge science and the incredible depends heavily on speculation from experts, who often discuss classified military projects and advanced research. There’s a big emphasis on how some emerging technology can be used as weapons, though there’s no direct violence. There aren't any other strong parental red flags, either, but the show may not be compelling enough to really grab kids' attention.
What's the story?
It's a short distance between the most advanced scientific research and the supposedly unachievable; THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE tries to explain exactly what scientists can do now -- and what it would take to move to the next step. In other words, narrator Jonathan Frakes and a variety of experts discuss whether something that's "impossible" now will soon be within our reach. The series combines historical footage and computer animations to first examine concepts like invisibility, weather control, and robotic soldiers and then speculate how learning to master them could change the world.
Is it any good?
The show's producers have tracked down some of the world’s top scientists, and it’s fascinating to watch them demonstrate truly amazing breakthroughs. But the show wants to go further; instead of seeing, for example, a cloak that uses advanced photographic technology to simulate near invisibility in a lab, it tries to convince us that true invisibility may already be possible.
In this, it reaches too far. Much of the show's speculation is based on rumors about secret military projects, some still secret. As a result, the show has little to go on, and the experts can only skim the surface of these concepts. Hearing some talking head tell thinly substantiated stories about a classified effort to make a tank invisible isn't compelling. Frakes repeats the experts' claims, sometimes more than once, using tepid computer animations ... but no real evidence. Hearing wild assertions repeated feels like padding. We don’t need an expert to tell us that rendering soldiers and tanks invisible would give an army an big strategic advantage, and we certainly don’t need them to make the same obvious point over and over.
What families can talk about
Families can talk about technology and the military. Why do so many advanced scientific breakthroughs get used as weapons? Do you think the military should have first dibs on cutting-edge research? Can you think of non-violent applications for some of the ideas presented here?
Also, some of the alleged breakthroughs presented here are the result of classified projects that are still secret. Why do you think the government and other large organizations might choose to hide things from the public?
There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title below.
| TV rating: | TV-PG |
| Network: | History |
| Cast: | Jonathan Frakes |
| Genre: | Educational |
Review It
Great alternatives handpicked by our editors
Already seen it? What do you think?
More from Common Sense Media
Top advice and articles
