The Twilight Zone (2002)

 Review

Common Sense Media says

Pop star cameos can't elevate remake of creepy classic.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Not yet rated

Kids say

Not yet rated

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this remake of the 1960s televison series deals in psychological tension. While there is some actual violence, it's usually more passive (i.e., a character is hit by a car) than hostile. The truly scary part of the series occurs inside viewers' minds when creepy scenarios meet supernatural elements, like mind reading, life after death, and imaginary creatures. Each episode effectively serves as a mini morality tale, so parents may want to be prepared to discuss their views on the episodes' subjects. Expect some mild language ("bastard," "jackass") and some occasional drinking.

  • Viewers can interpret these episodes as mini morality lessons: For every action there is a consequence. However, consequences are not necessarily realistic or logical.
  • Host Forest Whitaker serves as a tour guide through the series, helping to lead audience members through the lessons or message of each episode.
  • Some violent situations, depending on individual episodes, include characters being hit by cars, struck by lightning, or engaging in fist fights
  • Sex is implied but there is no graphic sexuality.

What's the story?

The second remake of the 1960s series, THE TWILIGHT ZONE (2002) skews towards a younger, teenage audience than the original, and features a number of actors who would later make it big, including Hayden Christensen, Portia De Rossi, Jeremy Piven, and Robin Tunney. Each 30-minute episode is a separate, self-contained narrative, similar to the original series' set-up. The only recurring character is host Forest Whitaker, who introduces and then concludes each episode. The majority of episodes feature new storylines, though there are some remakes of original episodes, including "The Monsters Are On Maple Street" and "The Eye of the Beholder."


Is it any good?

 

On its own, this sci-fi series fares reasonably well. The writing is solid, and constant cameos by famous or up-and-coming actors are definitely a fun touch, especially for a teen audience (Jessica Simpson guest starring as a babysitter paranoid about a doll collection is definitely entertaining). However, it's impossible not to compare this series to the original. To ask Forest Whitaker to step
into Rod Serling's shoes is a difficult request, and the normally excellent
actor is unconvincing as the new host in the updated version of the
show. Also, the episodes aren't consistently good, and very few will pull at you for much longer than the time it takes you to watch them -- there's no similarly affecting image as that of the gremlin on the airplane wing from the original's "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet."

On the bright side, the writing is lively and imaginative, and viewers will be treated to television that will surprise with twist endings and impossible scenarios. But even though the series isn't terrible, viewers would be better served by watching the original Twilight Zone.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

  • Families can talk about imagination and fear. What do you find more scary, the violence in the series or the psychological elements? How can one's imagination create more fear than the actual situation?

  • Do you think the episodes contain lessons or are they purely for entertainment? What kinds of things do these episodes make you think about?


This review was written by Elka Karl
Adult
February 6, 2011
 

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Elka Karl
This review was written by Elka Karl
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see The Twilight Zone (2002)?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it