Alexander

  • Review Date: July 31, 2005
  • R
  • Genre: Drama
  • 2004
 Review

Common Sense Media says

Alexander the person was great. This movie isn't.
greenON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
yellowPAUSE: Know your child; some content
may not be right for some kids.
redOFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
not for kidsNOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age.

Find out more

Quality
 
Sometimes media can be age appropriate but a real waste of time. Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Parents say

Kids say

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie has extreme and explicit battle violence with many impalings and other graphic injuries. Alexander is portrayed as bi-sexual. There are very explicit heterosexual sexual situations and references and male and female nudity, plus references and implications of gay sex and some same-sex kissing and a mother-son kiss on the mouth and an attempted rape. Some exotic dancers perform in skimpy attire. Characters drink, sometimes to excess.

  • Not applicable.
  • Intense and graphic battle violence, many deaths, lots of blood.
  • Nudity, explicit sexual gay and heterosexual references and situations.

What's the story?

Alexander (Colin Farrell) is the son of Philip (Val Kilmer) and Olympias (Angelina Jolie) and at the center of a firestorm of political intrigue and bitter personal feuds. His parents despise each other, and each urges Alexander to be bold and to trust no one. Alexander grows up to be very competitive but also sensitive. He tames the wild horse Bucephalus, gaining his father's approval. But then Philip, who wants to make Olympias less powerful, takes another wife. He is about to name her infant son his successor when he is assassinated, making Alexander the king. Alexander takes his armies on a quest to conquer the known world over eight years and 22,000 miles.


Is it any good?

 

Alexander the person was great. ALEXANDER the movie is not. It is horrendously bad, a genuine 40-car pile-up of literally epic proportions, a three-way head-on collision of bad writing, bad acting, and bad direction. The one watchable part of the movie are the battle scenes. Writer/director Oliver Stone can stage a battle. The fights with the soldiers of Persia and India are striking and the confrontation between horse- and elephant-riders is exceptional. But the rest of the movie is dreadful, a mish-mash of a clunker script delivered in a mish-mash of accents. It's bad enough when one of the Greek soldiers speaks with the actor's own Scottish burr. It is even worse when Roxane (Rosario Dawson), the wife Alexander chooses from Bactria, uses the kind of faux all-purpose foreign pronunciation usually reserved for native maidens in 1940's B-movies set on tropical islands. She sees him with Hephaestion (Jared Leto) and hisses "You love chhHEEEM!!"

The accents may be all over the place, but the Classic Comic-style dialogue is consistently terrible. No one could make these lines sound believable: "You must never confuse your feelings with your duties!" "Your life hangs in the balance!" "You can run to the ends of the earth, you coward, but you will never run far enough!" "We are most alone when we are with the myths." "It was here that Alexander made one of his most mysterious decisions." "They forgive you because you make them proud of themselves!" "What have I done to make you hate me so?" "You're a king -- act like one!" Perhaps most disappointing of all is that there is not one performance with any authenticity or appeal. Even Farrell and Jolie lose all sense of perspective and resort to snorts and eye-rolling histrionics.


Sign Up Message
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Each week we send a customized newsletter to our parent and teen subscribers. Parents can customize their settings to receive recommendations and parent tips based on their kids’ ages. Teens receive a version just for them with the latest reviews and top picks for movies, video games, apps, music, books, and more.
Please enter an email address.
Please check your email address for possible typos.
Sorry, you must be 13 or older to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Sign me up!

What families can talk about

Families can talk about Alexander's influences. What did he learn from his father and what did he learn from his mother? Why did he marry Roxane? What was most important to him? What is best remembered about him? Why?


This review was written by Nell Minow
Teen, 16 years old
April 9, 2008
 
Horrible! I had to cover my eyes.
I respect Alexander the person but the movie is terrible.I regret even watching it.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
October 6, 2010
 
Lots of violence + lots of sex = a movie not for children. Alexander isn't worth watching.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
I wanted to throw up and I left the movie after 2 hours

Flag as inappropriate 
Teen, 17 years old
April 9, 2008
 
It's ok
the movie wasn't all that bad all though the story line was mixed up and it focused to much about him being gay it wasn't great but worth watching

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
Even gay people thought this was a bomb.
The movie portrays in a light how difficult it was to be gay and have to take on a wife in order to carry on the royal family. It's always been done this way. However, beyond that, the acting is bad, the storyline is muck and I'll say for one that they paid more attention to the romance and the lust Alexander has for his love interests than for the actual meat of his character. It's hard to pay attention to what he actually did when the movie keeps reverting you back to his sexuality and love interests. I realize that it is important when you're doing a movie that you need to include all portions of the character because to do so simply to satisfy the droves of religious ideologs is irresponsible self censorship and an extreme injustice to the name of the person being represented. At the same time, you must not focus all attention on one issue. You either portray Alexander as a great leader who happened to be gay and was forced to marry a woman or you portray Alexander as a gay man who happened to be a good leader. One or the other. This isn't a movie intended for children or young teens to watch. It wasn't created for them, hence, not for then to watch. Older teens who know about sex and understand homosexuality shouldn't have a problem with this movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
Not worth a penny!
This movie grossed me out. Too much sexual situations that are not Christian based. I wish I could get a refund for my money and my time!

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 
What a terrible movie
My family watched the edited version (*flicksclub*), but I do, however, know what was in the movie, and that it was totally inappropriate. The editors obiously had a hard time making it clean, and failed to get ALL of the suggestive scenes out (see the common sense info.) Also, the story was just plain stupid. The plot didn't know where is were headed, and therefore never really went anywhere. On top of that, the movie can be divided into two parts: the battles, and the endless monologues. Nothing else. There was no redeeming qualities, either, and no comic relief. It was incredibly dark. Not a good movie.

Flag as inappropriate 
Adult
April 9, 2008
 

Flag as inappropriate 

This review was written by Nell Minow
Studio:Warner Bros.
Director:Oliver Stone
Cast:Angelina Jolie, Anthony Hopkins, Colin Farrell
Genre:Drama
Run time:245 minutes
Theatrical release date:November 24, 2004
DVD release date:August 2, 2005
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:violence and some sexuality/nudity.

This review was written by Nell Minow
 

Review It

Share your review with others

Hang on! You need to be a member to post your review.
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines.
About our rating system
ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
Learning ratings
BEST: Really engaging, great learning approach.
GOOD: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
FAIR: Somewhat engaging, OK learning approach.
NOT FOR LEARNING: Not recommended for learning.

Great alternatives handpicked by our editors

 

vote now

Will you see Alexander?


Already seen it? What do you think?

 

Been There? Tell us about it