 | ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids. |
 | OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age. |
Saw III
- Review Date: January 22, 2007
- R
- Genre: Horror
- 2006
Common Sense Media says
More bloody mayhem from Jigsaw; not for kids.
Parents say
QUALITY
Kids say
QUALITY
What parents need to know
Parents need to know that this horror sequel isn't for kids, though plenty of gore-loving teens will probably want to see it. Like its predecessors, it follows a series of characters trapped in terrible, torturous situations. Characters meet gruesome, bloody ends: suffocation, freezing, being shot through the neck, being pulled apart while attached to hooks and chains, neck and limbs being twisted and broken, and even a head exploding. One character performs graphic brain surgery, and another -- who's emotionally tormented -- cuts her own thigh. Repeated references to a 6-year-old boy who was hit and killed by a drunk driver. A woman appears getting out of bed (post-sex) with a man; another is shown hanging by her arms, completely naked (full frontal). A doctor pops anti-depressants and appears dazed while working on a little boy in the ER. Profanity includes 35+ uses of "f--k."
What's the story?
The insidious, ever-vengeful John Kramer/Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) returns for more blood and gore in SAW III. John's still up to his same old tricks-- selecting "subjects" who need to be morally reeducated and putting them in situations in which they must sacrifice some precious idea or body part in order to escape. This time, John/Jigsaw is bedridden with his cancerous brain tumor, so his protégé Amanda (Shawnee Smith) goes forth to bring a primary victim to his video-monitored warehouse. Amanda reels in Jeff (Angus Macfadyen), a man haunted by the death of his young son. Jeff must decide the fates of three other victims, all tied to his son's tragic death. He's forced to weigh his long-professed desire for revenge against the urge to do the "right" thing by forgiving those he blames for his pain. Meanwhile, Amanda's other snare, drug-addicted brain surgeon Lynn (Bahar Soomekh), is locked in a collar that will blow her head off if she doesn't operate on Jigsaw John. Lynn makes a series of decisions that John admires and says he wants to reward. But despite his assurances, Lynn isn't in control of her own fate. She's only part of a larger scheme -- which is how you might be feeling by the end of this third installment.
Is it any good?
The judgmental/instructional killer was introduced in the very low-budget Saw, in which Jigsaw's victims were locked in a basement for 90 minutes, the limits of space and time showing the ingenuity of young Australian filmmakers James Wan and Leigh Wannell. Since then, the murderous schemes and devices have been elaborated upon, and Jigsaw granted more history (this time he even gets a lost love, sunny and blond). For fans of the franchise, the expansion is both good (more of the same) and bad (obscuring the initial, strangely elegant simplicity).
Saw III offers more of the torture and suffering audiences have come to expect from the bloody series. Though its script is slightly more sophisticated than either of its predecessors -- Saw and Saw II -- its concept is the same. Darren Lynn Bousman's film is bursting with graphic, sometimes stomach-turning images of gore and suffering. But it also threads through a series of plot twists that pay off -- sometimes cleverly, usually predictably.
What families can talk about
Families can talk about John/Jigsaw's seeming "lesson" -- that revenge doesn't stop pain or guilt, but only prolongs it. How does Jigsaw judge his victims in order to rationalize his cruelty? How can you apply his lesson to other, less sensationally violent situations? What are other options besides "getting even" with someone who wronged you? How do you see Amanda's devotion to John? Is it possible for her to "love" him? How does her inability to learn John's "lesson" mark her inability to forgive or love anyone?
- Show:
- All members
- Parents
- Teens & kids
Kid, 11 years old
April 2, 2010
AGE
Saw III
Rated R For Strong Grisly Violence And Gore,Sequences Of Terror And Torture,Nudity And Language
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Pretty good series
There is some gore in this film and scenes of torture. There's some strong language and a scene where a woman is completely nude. Too violent for young kids.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Not good for any kids under 14
This might be the worst Saw movie ive seen. It is very confusing. One part there was a naked woman being hung by chains. I had to skip through that part. When I heared the C word I knew I had to turn it off. This movie is not for kids. Too much cussing and sex related stuff. The torture is bloodier that the first and second one.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Not even suitable for some adults!
Ok, this mmovie took me 3 yeers to watch because i just couldnt get past some of it, A GIRL GETS HER RIBCAGE RIPPED OUT, N A GY GETS HIS ARMS, LEGS N HEAD TWISTED AL THE WAY AROUND!!!!!!!! INSANITY!!!!
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
FD with this with Chucky- WTF
Lol believe or not if I tell u this,but it's true I never lie and that's not a lie too I promise you
Lololololol I took my lil brother( hes 10)to see it bcuz my parents
Wouldn't allow him to stay home my dad and me and his friend with his friends son were going and my mum was meeting up so he had to go..lol and he cried and we had to go out of the cinema ..then we bought the directors cut and the uncut and watched it again on DVD..lololololol
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Possibly the best of the series.
Best of the series, I enjoy how the Idea is about saving the people who hurt the character, as apose to saving the people who helped the character like in part six and seven. The movie is violent, but if you could handle the first two, you are probably good for this one. Language is heavy, but they are just words, they cannot harm you. There is a scene of nudity, but it is presented on a non-sexual manner. Overall, this is a good movie, Much better than the second and equal to if not better than the first.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
i love this movie
best movie ever. very very violent but really cool :)
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
A Record
Hopefully im not cursing myself but this is great also. The 1st time ive seen a series of movies were the 1st three are great. The violence is a lot bloodier in this, although not to bad. The most disgusting part was the brain surgery (not for weak stomachs). there is full frontal female nudity. but overall the twist in this was one of the best sofar. so if ur a fan of the 1st 2 ull like this one 2.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Gross
I threw up during this movie. Very Gory..
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
now the series gets a huge downfall
Saw 1-3 i dared to watch but this movie goes beyond limits of humanity the scenes are gross and gory also the bad language is at limits aswell. unless u dont want to see a man twisting his body or woman getting freezed then get it otherwise stay clear off.
Was this review useful?
|
|
| Studio: | Lionsgate |
| Director: | Darren Lynn Bousman |
| Cast: | Angus Macfadyen, Shawnee Smith, Tobin Bell |
| Genre: | Horror |
| Run time: | 107 minutes |
| Theatrical release date: | October 27, 2006 |
| DVD release date: | October 23, 2007 |
| MPAA rating: | R |
| MPAA explanation: | strong grisly violence and gore, sequences of terror and torture, nudity and language. |
Review It
Great alternatives handpicked by our editors
Already seen it? What do you think?
More from Common Sense Media
Top advice and articles
