Harry Potter Age-by-Age Guide

There's a Harry Potter for everyone. Find the right books, movies, and games to introduce as kids grow up. By Common Sense Media Editors

Discovering the joys of Harry Potter is a rite of passage for kids today. Since J.K. Rowling released the first book more than 15 years ago, kids have been devouring the books, watching the movies, and -- at least for super fans -- playing games and apps and visiting websites devoted to the young wizard (and even visiting theme parks!). One of the delights of discovering Harry Potter is that you see him grow up. But along with that, the subject matter of the books and movies gets scarier, the villains get viler, and beloved characters die.

If your family is just getting into this magical world, here's a quick age guide for enjoying Harry Potter with your kids. Keep in mind that all kids are different, so assess your child's ability to handle frights and peril before you see the movies or read the books.

6-7: A great age to begin.

7-8: Kids can start to read alone and enjoy the early movies and video games.

8-9: The books get more intense. The movies get scarier.

9-10: For the first time, the movies become really dark.

10-11: Beloved characters die, and the movies get even scarier (you might wait until 12+).

11-12: Your kids can probably handle everything J.K. Rowling sends their way. (But you might want to accompany them to the more mature movies.)

And for a complete list of every single piece of media related to Harry Potter, check out our list.

More Stuff You'll like Powered by PubExchange (i)

At what age did your kid become a Harry Potter fan?

Add comment

Sign in or sign up to share your thoughts

Comments (66)

Teen, 13 years old written by Booklover13h

I love this amazing series, since i started reading it when i was six. I finished the series three years later, but i have read and reread the series many millions of times since then. I started the movies much later, like when i was ten, and the first movie is actually one of the scariest for me, because of the part with Voldemort on the back of the teacher's head. Kids are scared of different things, and everyone is different, so there is no perfect age, it just depends on who they are. They might get a little scared, but still want to continue reading, and you should probably let them, after a talk about the difference between real life and fantasy. Because they are such great books. I didn't really get all of it the first time i read them, but you don't need to to understand it. Parents could read the book at the same time as their child to help them.
Teen, 13 years old written by palindrome24601

Parents--get this book in your kid's hands ASAP. I read Harry Potter when I was seven and in the second grade, and from "Mr. and Mrs. Dursley of number four, Privet Drive were proud to say they were perfectly normal, thank you very much" I was hooked. I followed Harry's entire journey that year, and have since reread and re-reread and quite possibly even re-re-reread the seven "bloody brilliant" books. Did I understand every little thing that happened when I read the book at seven? No, probably not. But I understood enough to know that I had found friends who would be there to laugh with me, cry with me, and go on never-ending adventures with me who would last a lifetime. And the fantastic thing about Harry Potter is that it really isn't just a book. You can't just read Harry Potter and move on with your life, and if you can, you'll never know love or friendship and I feel sorry for you. Harry Potter is a universe, meant to be entered again and again. So even if your seven-year-old doesn't comprehend every plot line or lesson their first time at Hogwarts, they should enter the Wizarding World again and again. Each time I've read the series, I find a sentence to re-interpret or a theme I may have missed. This series is an ever-growing, immortal adventure that a child should be introduced to as soon as possible so that she can have as much time as possible to live it. I really wish these books had been handed to me at five instead of seven. Once your child has a good couple of years of reading under his belt, I would give him Harry Potter. It is my philosophy that a child should be entered into the wizarding world when she is young enough that a Hogwarts letter is still a very real possibility, that is to say, before her eleventh birthday and in most cases much sooner than that. As for the issue of the books being too frightening for younger readers, it would probably be insensitive for me to say that they should stop being giant babies, so I won't. I guess, depending on your child's maturity level, there might be some strong evidence for leaving books 5-7 for later. But I think it's good for children to learn that in the real world, there really are some Bellatrix Lestranges and Tom Riddles. The things Harry Potter will teach your child far out weigh any other worries, in my opinion. The series teaches many important lessons, for example, that cruel intolerance is unacceptable, that friendship really is a precious thing, that those in authority are not always right, and quite importantly that our heroes are not always as pure white as their beards. Above all, Harry Potter teaches love, which I think counteracts any frightening aspects of the series. If your child quakes in the stare of the Basilisk or quivers when the boy who lives comes to die, she will still learn that love is so great that its power is above any other twisted, evil event in the series. That's what the Harry Potter books are all about. So, in conclusion, it is my opinion that your child should run straight through platform 9 and 3/4 and hop on the Hogwarts Express as soon as he possibly can. Be she six or sixteen, if your child has not read Harry Potter, it is of upmost importance that she meet Harry, Ron, Hermione, Draco, Ginny, Luna, Neville and everyone else as soon as she possibly can.
Kid, 11 years old

I read Harry Potter at age 8, finished the series at 10. It probably depends on your child's maturity, If they can handle it, they probably can handle Harry Potter. Heck I read the 7th book and didn't get scared at all. I thought it was an adventure. I do suggest not to read the books or watch the movies if you are easily frightened or scared.
Teen, 15 years old written by Edylla

I read this whole series when I was 8, I'm 15 now. Still a voracious reader, still haven't been able to find any book that tops Harry Potter.
Kid, 10 years old

I am a HUGE Harry Potter fan. I have read all the books, and seen all the movies, and have even played most of the games. (I am an avid reader and voracious gamer) I'm pretty sure I started to become a Harry Potter fan when I was about six years old. It's a wonderful place, and by the time I was eight, I'd read all of them and seen all of them. They are amazing books and movies, and I recommend them for all ages. Yet, I'd be careful when you get to The Half-Blood Prince, which is number 6. I have read books like The 5th Wave, Hunger Games and Divergent, so Harry Potter didn't bother me at the age of seven, but know your child. I would recommend the Potter movies for the following ages: The Sorcerer's Stone: 7+ The Chamber of Secrets: (know your child) 7-8+ The Prisoner of Azkaban: (probably my favourite of the entire series, or at least close second to the finale, but it does have characters in peril, it's all very dark, and it has some thematic elements. Again, know your child) 7-9+ The Goblet of Fire: (SPOILER ALERT! The first child to die in this series dies in this movie/book. It's quite sad and dramatic, so, once more, know your child.) 7-9+ The Order of the Phoenix: (this one is probably my least favourite, for I thought it was prolonged. This movie is when the series begins to get really dark.) 8-10+ The Half-Blood Prince: (epic and dramatic. Love this one.) 9+ Deathly Hallows Part One: 9+ Deathly Hallows Part Two: (epic, albeit violent finale. Great movie. It's a stunning masterpiece. If you've seen the others, don't hesitate to watch this. It is very dark though. You will be sad when this movie is over. It's amazing.) 9-10+ So that concludes my long (okay, rambling) review of the Harry Potter series. Expose your child to this series at an early age, and you won't regret it. Happy watching!
Parent of a 7 year old written by H276558

My daughter will be 8 next week, is very bright and a voracious reader. She finished the first book easily but was frightened by a part in the second book when Harry was supposed to have his arm fixed but someone put a spell on him and removed his bones instead . She was scared enough that she was afraid to sleep in her room alone last night or even be up there alone. She is empathic (and so am I) but does not normally get this scared. We talked to her about her fears and she logically understands the books are fiction but was still afraid. We gave her lots of TLC and she said she loves the book and doesn't want to stop reading it, but suggested she not read it before bed anymore. We highly agreed! We also decided after she finishes book two she can wait a year or two before trying the next one. She was completely fine with this! In its place, we've found her some other highly-rated, age-appropriate and less intense books and she's thrilled. I'm so grateful for Common Sense Media's rating systems! She read over 70 books last summer and there are so many out there I wouldn't have known about without Common Sense!
Teen, 17 years old written by allopezreader

I read the first book in second grade; for me, the only "scary" element was in the movie, when Voldemort's face is on the back of Quirrell's. Obviously, they do get darker, but I was only allowed to read the first one at that moment. At the time, the book series did not hold a lot of interest, so I didn't continue. However, my freshman year of high school, my friend convinced me to read them. I am glad that I did, and I do wish that I did start to read them sooner like in middle school. My younger sister started reading them in 5th grade, but she read all of them in 5th grade, and in my opinion, she was not mature enough to handle books 5-7 at that age. For the movies, know what your child can and cannot handle. There are some scenes that can be frightening. Based on my experience, trust your parental instinct, talk to your child, and look at the movies' ratings. It just depends on the child. I was an advanced reader and very mature for my age, which is why I was allowed to start so early. On the other hand, my younger sister did start later than me, but she shouldn't have read the entire series in 5th grade. She is maturing now, but I do believe it would have been better if she held off the later books for a little bit.
Parent written by HannahD 1

My daughter is 9 and we just finished the entire series of books. We have been watching all the movies right after the books (I had never seen them before). I was really surprised at how she has handled all of the things that I would have been scared of at her age. I am not really sure if it's because she knew the story well already or what. I previewed the last 3 films before letting her watch because the content was a little scarier. I talked to her about the parts that I was concerned about first and she did great. I have had other parents judge me harshly because I let her watch them with me but she is not afraid, she doesn't have nightmares, and she understands that it's a part of this amazing story. On principle, I wouldn't hasten to allow any 9 year old watch Deathly Hallows but I don't think I am a bad parent for making the decision to let her watch it. It's also been amazing to have these fantastic conversations with her about how wrong it is to be prejudice (muggle hating in the books) and relate it to real life. She has made amazing parallels to so many aspects of real life and society during the time I read these to her. JKR is absolutely brilliant has given my daughter and I a priceless gift, brilliant.
Teen, 14 years old written by Buffy Rules

I've honestly seen all of them as young as 10 or so, I can't remember. Being 14, I must say Harry Potter was a precursor of sorts to a young adult franchise collection (or, in some cases, failed after one installment made into a movie). I say that the first two Harry Potters are suitable for 7 and over, and if your child wants a bit darker, break the PG-13 rule for this franchise. It gets noticeably darker each installment, so it depends.
Kid, 11 years old

I started reading the 'Harry Potter' Serise when I was around 5. I found it AMAZING and I tried to get all my friends to read it but they could barley read! I have always been Mature for my age and read the 'Lord Of The Rings' Books when i was in grade 3. So, I think for a more mature child, they could start 'Harry Potter' At around age 6-8 and for the more innocent (?) start at age 10-13.
Parent written by akita

I have read HP series numerous times myself, so am quite familiar with the content of the books. My son started reading HP series at age 9. Read through the entire series in just a couple of weeks (he's fast and advanced reader). Book did not seem to bother him in terms of scariness, but I only allowed movies 1-3 for him to view at the time and he viewed it repeatedly. At 11.5yrs old, I told him he can watch #4 and 5. he's only watched #4 once. he prefers the book. I do not intend to let him watch #6-7.1/7.2 until at least 13 or older. our kids do not watch TV shows or live action movies much (animations and documentaries only) so they are more naive regarding movie f/x that can be pretty disturbing, and sometimes excessive. My daughter started reading HP at age 8. she is also a very advanced reader (running out of books that is "age appropriate") and seems to enjoy HP. But she is reading at a much slower pace, and there are finer points she misses since some of the concept is quite advanced. But she enjoys the main story (the superficial level that she can understand) for what it is and is not too disturbed with progressively dark tone of the story. What she doesn't quite understand the concept, sometimes she asks, and I explain. for sitautions she glosses over, I assume it's too advanced for her to understand nor care to understand, which is ok. I expect when she re-reads the book as she gets older, she will start picking up more on the nuances and enjoy it again. She has only watched movie #1 and has not asked to watch others, which is ok by us. We have the movies if she does choose to want to watch, but we're not going to force it on her. but at the same time we will limit which ones she can watch depending on her maturity at the time. I feel that if children are reading text, the images formed is based on what they are capable of imagining. So reading text that may be slightly beyond their years, if they don't understand what they are reading, they would just gloss over it, or only form a vague image of what is happening in their mind. Movies, however, are visual and will force the image onto a mind even if it were not capable of imagination. So you can overwhelm a child with too much violence/gore/cruelty by visualizing the scenes. Thus we put more limitation in the movie-watching than with book reading. Thus I'm not too concerned with HP books being read by a younger reader (although as some commented that they might miss out on the finer details of the storyline, which is true. but that's the beauty of the book. One can get out as much as one's maturity allows. if they don't understand or don't want to understand, they can gloss over it and pick up what they missed when they re-read it later in life), but I would and have limited what they can watch as a movie even if they were ok reading the books.
Adult written by DKC98

I think this is fair. Single-digit ages are far too young to be engaging in the Harry Potter series in my mind. The ALA ranks the series as YA for 12+, and all of the film's, particularly 3-8, are rated PG-13, with some having to have been cut extensively from R. Even the first two have high age ratings (9+) for solid PG films. The books are rated: 1-2: U-MG, 10+, 3: N-YA, 11+, 4-6: YA, 12+, 7: E-YA, 13+, 8(Cursed Child play: E-YA/N-A(New Adult), 14+. Tales of Beedle the Bard: N-YA, 11+ Films: 1-2: PG, 9+, 3: PG/PG-13, 10+, 4/6: PG-13, 12+, 5: PG-13, 11+, 7: PG-13/R: 14+, 8: PG-13, 13+. Overall: YA, PG-13, 12+ Here's The Hunger Games, for comparison: Books: 1/2: YA, 12+, 3: E-YA, 13+ 4 (play): N-YA, 11+ Movies: 1: PG-13/R, 13+, 2: PG-13, 12+, 3: PG-13, 11+, 4: PG-13, 11+ Overall: YA, PG-13, 12+ In short: Harry Potter when you look at the ALA's detailed content analysis, ranks older than The Hunger Games in many areas of content suitability, and equals it overall. Harry Potter is a Young Adult series, not a children's series. It's for teens. If you wouldn't let your child read The Hunger Games simply because of its scary premise, do not let your child read Harry Potter. Personally, I let my child read The Hunger Games at 5, before Harry Potter for the reasons you mentioned in your post, and because I found it less challenging in terms of writing, theme, and content. It was very simple and small and scope, intense, but friendly for a younger mind due to the writing and by extension the content and the themes.
Parent written by dhanyab

Just finished reading aloud Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone to my 5.5 year old. He loved it, and is currently enjoying the audio book! While it may be ideal to have let him wait until he was 11 to start the series, like I was, there is so much Harry Potter floating around in pop culture, on TV, in conversations, in his Lego books, that he was becoming QUITE curious about it and I feel if I left it many more years he would have known the story long before ever lifting a page of the book. We have no plans to move on to the other books at this young age,
Adult written by DKC98

I would definitely wait Just remember: they're Young Adult books. They're the equivalent of PG-13 rated material, and are aimed at an audience of adolescents/young adults. The pervasiveness of the series, much like other YA phenomenons, has ensured kids way younger than acceptable have read these books, but it's not appropriate for little kids, particularly single digit ages. The AlA ranks the first two books as Upper Middle Grade, (10+), the third as New Young Adult (11+), the fourth, fifth, and sixth as Young Adult (12+), and the seventh as Edgy Young Adult (13+). Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, the upcoming sequel installment in the form of a stage play, has the disclaimer that "due to mature content, the play is strongly recommended only for teenagers and up (12+), with an absolute minimum suggested age of 10+. Children under 4 will not be admitted. The predicted textual rating is Edgy Young Adult or New Adult, with an age recommendation of 13+ or 14+. The series is popular with: 15-30 year olds (teens and adults). Recommended merchandise guidance: "while the Harry Potter franchise has been marketed to all demographics, from little kids to adults, the average accepted age for most of the supplemental works and merchandise is Young Adult (Tweens/Teens+). Video Game ratings and age recommendations: Everyone 10+/Teen/Mature. Some Harry Potter games are appropriate for Tweens/Teens, while some are appropriate only for teens/adults. Harry Potter readability/lexical rating/ATOS level: 15 years of age + Movies (if movies struggled to maintain their classification, both ratings will be included EX. PG-13/R) Philosopher's stone, PG, 9+ Chamber of Secrets, PG, 9+ Prisoner of Azkaban, PG/PG-13, 10+ Goblet of Fire, PG-13, 12+ Order of the Phoenix, PG-13, 11+ Half-Blood Prince, PG-13, 12+ Deathly Hallows Part 1, PG-13/R, 14+ Deathly Hallows Part 2, PG-13, 13+ Fantastic Beasts Predicted Ratings: Film 1: PG-13, 12+ Film 2: PG-13, 13+ Film 3: PG-13, 14+ Companion books: Fantastic Beasts: Not Applicable Quidditch Through the Ages: Not Applicable Tales of Beedle the Bard: New Young Adult (11+) Readability: 16 years of age + Overall series classification: YA, 12+ Harry Potter theme parks/attractions/events: While most are recommended for Tweens/Teens+, some are recommended for teens/adults or adults only. They're NOT for little kids.
Parent written by Parrentio

You are all so rediculus my son read all of them kindergarten through first grade. Wait until they want to read them and than let them. The only inappropriate thing in Harry Potter is some language in the 6th and 7th book. I feel like common sense has no common sense. If you listen to them I am warning you they will distroy everything with their bad warnings. - A Fellow Parent
Teen, 13 years old written by writerreader

I started reading Harry Potter at about 9, and the only really inapropriate thing is some swears, and that's okay, because it isn't for 7 year olds. It's a young adult series, which means that there are concepts that some kids won't understand, like how Voldemort's yearning for power destroyed him, and the innocent falling victim to death, and yes, there is a LOT of violence in 5-7, so I wouldn't reccomend to younger kids. They can be grim and dark, but Harry Potter is not a children's book! There are complex subjects that younger kids won't understand. If they want to read at oh, 9/10, let them, for goodness sakes! MY parents never had a problem except for the movies, and I saw 1,2,3,and 4 and then once I turned 12 they let me.
Parent written by excellentparent

My 7 year old daughter has read HP 1 - 6 and is currently reading 7. She seems ok with it - she's mentioned it's a bit scary and sad in parts and she stopped reading for a couple of days but is now right back in it. Thoughts?
Adult written by DKC98

Yea. It's still not appropriate for a 7 year old. It's more advanced than most YA, it's a YA series to begin with, it portrays the lives of teenagers dealing with violent and sometimes adult situations and has never been for little kids...this isn't Roald Dahl. You're not supposed to let a 7 year old run through all of these books in one go. I guarantee you she comprehended less than 10% of the story. The Harry Potter series is a YA series aimed at readers 10-18 years old. It has never been for little kids. I would encourage her to pick up the series again at 10.
Adult written by DKC98

Eh....not one to tell parents what to do, but 7 is still way too young...10 is the ideal starting age. Reading it at 7 blunts the stories impact. Here's a guideline: the Harry Potter series average classification, according to the ALA and most libraries, is YA (Young Adult). It's recommended for kids 12+, with a peripheral age range that extends down to 10. It's market sits int the10-18 age range. So, they aren't children's book in the strictest sense, even though no one wants to drop that term. The third book is especially iffy for a 7 year old, books 4-6 are pretty much off for her, and the 7th one should be strictly off limits. I recommend encouraging her to read it, or re-read it later. Again; the Harry Potter series isn't for little children. It's aimed primarily at teens and up due to content, thematic material, and lexical/readability level. It's just too mature a story for a child of 7. If you wouldn't let your child read The Hunger Games (which really isn't as mature in most fields as Harry Potter) or the His Dark Material's series (for a younger age group than HP,) you really shouldn't be Harry Potter to anyone younger than about 10/11. I really agree with what RhetCultureMom said about teens being pushed out of the novels (the Harry Potter novels speak grittily about the coming of age and the loss of innocence that all teens endure) due the increasing stigma that these are "children's books" when they just don't resemble them at all. They're a more mature form of literature in every way. Harry Potter certainly hit big enough initially to keep its wide audience, but to keep infantilizing the series and keep pushing it on kids way too young to appreciate it is to damage its future potential of reaching a wide audience. Which of course leads Jo, the author, (who's never been shy about using graphic violence or gritty human struggles, emotions, and drama to get themes and messages across,) to feel that she has to neuter her series to keep from isolating an audience that she never intended to write for, at least exclusively. This type of thing really decreases a stories ability to be enjoyed by a whole variety of people. They're for teenagers. The children's misclassification is sort of frustrating and insulting given the fact that, again, the series doesn't resemble a children series, and that no one seems to want to address the middle ground. It's either for children or adults to some people, and even though it resembles the typical Young Adult series to a T, and even resembles adult literature in many ways, I still here people making up excuses left, right, and center, trying to limit its thematic significance by patronizing the absolute crap out of it. Which is why I really don't take kindly to adults who shove it on their children at absurdly young, single-digit ages. It's just. Not. For them. It's also, as I said in a different manner of words, insulting to the audience who currently consumes it most: people ages 15+. It's sends the message that they're interested in books designed for little kids. Who, for the 100th time, it's so not aimed at.
Parent written by excellentparent

she just finished book 7 and now wants to start reading the series again from book 1! She reads on a kindle so is able to use the dictionary to look up words. She is an avid reader and regularly reads until 10:00 pm.
Educator and Parent written by HEH2009

As a middle school English teacher, K-12 reading specialist, and Harry Potter fan, here's my professional point of view: Harry's age coincides with the reading level of each book. In the first book, Harry turns 11 and goes to what would be our equivalent of 6th grade. The second book is a bit longer, with words more suited to a 7th grade vocabulary, and a more complex story. This continues throughout the series. That said, most kids like to read about characters who are about 2 years older than themselves, so age 9 would be appropriate. Does this help?
Parent written by Eskarina

Many of the comments seem so bizarre to me! No HP until teen years? Good grief. Let's not forget that we're raising future adults, who will need to be self sufficient and confident. Besides which, they'll be tackling Lord of the Flies in high school. When did this culture of coddling children begin? For centuries, there wasn't even such a thing as children's literature. They read the same things everyone else did, and were fine. While I'm rather fond of children's literature, I find it strange that even classic children's books are being treated as if they're inappropriate. Let's not forget: death is natural, and so is fear. Peter rabbit's father was eaten in a pie, the Velveteen rabbit's boy almost died, and Alice nearly loses her head. Snow white's stepmother tried to eat her heart, Cinderella is abused, and Rapunzel was abducted. While children should have guidance on the books, I don't believe they should be banned. My 4 year old son has seen the first two and we've read the first book. I read them at a similar age. He had some good questions, which I answered. He was satisfied and not even slightly traumatized. Children emulate what they see. If you act like the bogeyman is in the closet, and evil strangers lurk around every corner, you will have fearful children who become fearful adults. It is far better, in my opinion, to show them they needn't be afraid, and teach them the skills they need to face problems. Harry Potter is a wonderful example of this.
Parent written by Parrentio

Finally someone who understands what crap common sense is putting out. You get a five star review. You should start your own common sense site. I would listen
Adult written by DKC98

Harry Potter has NEVER been for 4 year olds. I'm sorry, but not only are you giving him more mature and complicated stories to read way before he can understand, you are actively patronizing the series. At the absolute youngest, Harry Potter is for the 9/10 crowd. Four is absurdly young, and you should really be ashamed of yourself. Harry Potter bares absolutely no resemblance to the simple, sweet stories of Cinderella and Rapunzel, and it's absolutely disrespectful and patronizing to the series, it's intended audience, and it's themes that you think they are. Short answer: Yes, the Harry Potter series is labelled Young Adult for good reason. The characters are teenagers and they deal with issues pertaining to that stage in life. The content is entirely too visceral and violent, the writing far too complex, the material too emotionally mature for anyone younger than 11 at the youngest to fully comprehend. The movies are primarily PG-13. One almost got an R rating. Harry Potter has NEVER been appropriate for a 4 year old. I'm sorry. You're pushing it on him way too young, therefore robbing the series of any thematic significance, because a kid that young will not understand the story at all, and the material is far too harsh. I'm sorry. No. The Harry Potter series is directed at the same audience as the His Dark Materials series, The Hunger Games series, and the Divergent series. Would you give a kid those? No.
Educator and Parent written by RyanB 2

One book I have read that my daughter actually loved is called Libellus de Numeros which is part of the Magicae Mathematica series by author Jim West. Great middle age fiction book about Alex, a young precocious girl, who mysteriously gets transported to a strange world where Latin and Math combine in formulas and equations with magical effects. http://www.magicaemathematica.com
Adult written by rebma97

I've always felt that Harry Potter was best for the double digits, or the middle school set. Of course, once you get to Order of The Phoenix, you have to be more mature to handle all the violence.
Teen, 16 years old written by dcasey98

My library issues the following classifications for the Harry Potter series: Philosopher's Stone: U-MG (Upper-Middle Grade) for moderate violence and menace and mild thematic material-all involving children Chamber of Secrets: U-MG for moderate violence and menace and moderate thematic material-all involving children Prisoner of Azkaban: N-YA (New-Young Adult) for moderate violence and menace, moderate thematic material, and some mild language-all involving teens Goblet of Fire: YA (Young Adult) for rough action violence including strong, bloody imagery, some mild language, questionable behavior, alcohol abuse, crude humor, and strong thematic material-all involving teens Order of the Phoenix: YA for rough action featuring strong, bloody violence and some gory imagery, consumption of alcohol, questionable behavior, crude humor, teen partying, and strong thematic content Half-Blood Prince: YA for strong, bloody violence, mild language, alcohol abuse and parallels to substance abuse, questionable behavior, some language, some sensual scenes, and some sexual thematic material, teen partying, and strong thematic content Deathly Hallows: E-YA (Edgy-Young Adult) for strong, bloody, and gory violence, disturbing imagery, some moderate sensuality and sexual thematic material, some moderate language, questionable behavior, alcohol abuse, and heavy, disturbing thematic material The movies are rated as follows (if the film in question struggled to maintain a certain rating in the face of the MPAA or other worldwide film classification bodies, the rating will include both, Ex. rated PG/PG-13) Philosopher's stone: Rated PG, recommended age 9+ Chamber of Secrets: Rated PG, recommended age 9+ Prisoner of Azkaban: Rated PG/PG-13 recommended age 10+ Goblet of Fire: Rated PG-13 recommended age 12+ Order of the Phoenix: Rated PG-13 recommended age 11+ Half-Blood Prince: Rated PG-13 recommended age 12+ Deathly Hallows Part 1: Rated PG-13/R recommended age 14+ Deathly Hallows Part 2: Rated PG-13 recommended age 13+ Overall Series classification: YA (Young Adult) for 7 counts of violence (moderate or above)-100% of the series 2 counts of sexuality-28% 4 counts of profanity-57% 4 counts of substance abuse-57% 6 counts of thematic material-85% Harry Potter therefore has an appropriateness score of 34/50, representing the equivalent of an R rated classification, but it's acceptable scores range anywhere from 14/50 to 36/50, representing a book rating range of anywhere from Upper-Middle Grade to New-Adult, and therefore, the equivalent possible film ratings of PG, PG-13, and R. This is used to gauge potential unsuitably. So Harry Potter could, at it's youngest extreme, be considered appropriate for more of a PG-rated crowd, while at its highest extreme could also, to a reasonable extent, be considered appropriate only for an R-rated, more adult crowd. Though it is, on average, a YA series and equates to more of a PG-13 rating. Just for a benchmark comparison, here's The Hunger Games series: The Hunger Games: YA for strong, bloody violence, alcohol abuse, and strong thematic material-all involving teens Catching Fire: YA for strong, bloody violence, alcohol and mentions of substance abuse, and strong thematic material Mockingjay: E-YA for strong, bloody, and gory violence, some disturbing imagery, a moment of sexual thematic material, some alcohol abuse and mentions of substance abuse, and extremely heavy, disturbing thematic material The films: The Hunger Games: Rated PG-13/R recommended age 13+ Catching Fire: Rated PG-13 recommended age 11+ Mockingjay Part 1: Rated PG-13 recommended age 12+ Overall rating: YA for 3 counts of violence-100% 0 counts of sexuality-0% 0 counts of language-0% 2 counts of substance abuse-66% 3 counts of thematic material-100% Overall/potential inappropriateness rating: 26/50 This series has a potential unsuitability rating of anywhere from 24/50 to 26/50, meaning suitable ratings of either YA or E-YA, and a suitable equivalent film rating of PG-13 What you realize when comparing these two YA series, is that Harry Potter has the same amount of violence as The Hunger Games, more sexual material than The Hunger Games, and more profane material than The Hunger Games, but slightly less questionable material pertaining to substance abuse and thematic content compared to The Hunger Games. It's Harry Potter's wide range of potential ratings, from a more U-MG, PG category, suitable for older children and Tweens, to a restrictive New-Adult, R-rated category, a category meant solely for older teens and adults, that confuses people as to its suitably. It can reasonably be considered fairly suitable material for kids as young as 9, but it could also, to a reasonable extent, due to its large amount of aggregated questionable content and thematic material, be considered appropriate or understandable only for older teens and adults. It's average, again, however, lies firmly in YA, PG-13 territory. I think it's a story for Tweens and teens. A mature child as young as 9 should be able to start the series, but beyond that, it really is meant for kids 12+. Plus, kids below a certain age tend to not grasp plotting and characters too well. They focus on the more insignificant, imaginitive details, and Harry Potter is much more than that.
Teen, 17 years old written by PotterPokemon

When I was in fifth grade I read the whole series. I don't think it's too inappropriate for young children. I think you might want to wait until a child can understand it. Kids develop at there own pace. If a eight year old can fully understand and accept the books they should be able to read them. I watched all the movies at age eleven and was not traumatized at all. I have reread all the books several times and each time I understood them a little more. So I disagree with this guide because it is very unreasonable. I think as long as a child is mature enough to read or watch the series they can.
Teen, 15 years old written by Tolkien2600

I picked up the first book, a copy belonging to a family member, at age six. I finished the series at eight. When people post comments arguing that children will be traumatized by reading the later books, I get slightly annoyed, because there is a very good reason that they won't be: they don't understand why the material should scare them. To a young elementary schooler, these adventure books are just that: a seven-year-long adventure. There aren't hidden meanings, themes that will keep them thinking for long after they've finished; the books are simply a narrative to tell a story. And so yes, I think that it is appropriate to allow young children to read them, because it will provide a basis for them to return to when they inevitably decide to reread them, whether constantly or after many years without picking them up. The rereading at an older age is, in my opinion, the more important experience. Rowling is really a master of hidden meanings and humor that slips right over the head of the younger section of her audience. However, it's not all humor that children will miss. In the Deathly Hallows, for example, is quite a blatant Holocaust allegory: the discrimination and methodical elimination of one group, the mindless hate, the hypocritical leader of the evil side. I remember being shocked when I picked up the book again at around twelve after a year-long hiatus and realizing this. The ministry of magic could be a thinly-veiled attack at the corruption in modern government; the list of this sort of thing goes in and on. Another large point of Rowling's work that will not be picked up by younger readers is the depth of knowledge of the classical world, such as Greek and Roman legends and historical figures, that she incorporated into her books. For example, Regulus Black: considered a traitor by his brother, yet willingly gave his life for the Light side after taking the Dark Mark. If you research Roman history, one Regulus lives a very similar tale. It is not just names that Rowling researched: connotations that only someone who has studied mythology would know are woven into many parts of the series. For example, when Umbridge is carried off by the centaurs in the Forbidden Forest, she is living out a fate the same as those women taken by centaurs in Greek mythology. Her behaviour afterwards certainly fits the circumstances. It is parts of the stories like these that will entertain children but make older readers think. I suppose what I am trying to day is that any age could read the books, but each person will get something different out of it. I certainly am seeing them differently even than I did two years ago. As for the movies, yes, they are all rather frightening. I was about eleven when the last ones came out, and I saw them in theaters. Yes, the torture scenes and battle scared me. However, they are only adaptations: good for entertainment, not much in them to interpret and think about. My only advice would be to let children read all of the books, discuss them, and understand the themes: this is more important than shielding them. These books and their movies-- all of them-- can, in my opinion, be handled by a mature ten-year-old.
Parent written by dongrenwah

My son is 7 and half, in second grade. He picked up the first book of Harry Potter from his older brother's room last week( around new year of 2015) and read aloud to me. He instantly loved reading it. He finished reading the first book within 5 days.(He read aloud to me.) It is quite easy for him to read it. I love his enthusiasm about reading it. But he gets scared when he goes to bed. He says he is scared by the things he reads in the book. He had nightmares twice now. But he still wants to keep reading the second book of the series. I am kind of concerned about so many dark scenes for him at this age, may hold off until later.
written by Buddy923

I began reading Harry Potter when I was in third grade like 7 or 8. I remember reading the Order of the Phoenix in 5th grade. It wasn't too scary for me. Now I'm 17 and Harry Potter is still my favorite series. I reread them all the time. I think it all depends on the kid. Some can handle it earlier, others later.
Teen, 14 years old written by Beth99

I was 5 when I discovered the Harry Potter series by this time the first three has been released and my Dad (who had watched the films of the first two before reading the books) decided that he wanted to read them to so from that age me and my dad had a nightly schedule we would read together the book for a hour before I when to bed and this time became later as I got older and when the last book came out he agreed to take me to the launch party where J.K Rowling read an extract of the book. But we also developed a ritual to go to every opening night of the last four movies. I found that Harry Potter brought me closer to my dad so I don't agree with your list it's up to you as a parent of when you let your child read them or you read them to them
Kid, 9 years old

Well I started reading harry potter when I was 8, so a year ago. It had most violence in the 4+ books. When I read the last one, I stopped for I while because it was super scary. I only stopped for a day, but I read the last. It was an ok series for kids, but I'd start when your 8 and older.
Parent written by duncan311

I DO NOT agree about starting HP a 6-7. 1- It was a good idea to start young when they were released because you had to wait 1 - 3 years for the next book. by the time they start to get darker, your kid is already old enough to handle it. I know each kid is different, but there is nothing my parents could have done to stop me reading them all within a month. I consider myself lucky that i had to wait for them to be released. I started at 10yr old and finished at 16. The book is written from a teenager's point of view, not a kid's pov. I'm convinced that if you start too young (e.i. before 11), you would miss out on a big part of what makes HP a great book.
Teen, 14 years old written by AngelsFlight

I started reading Harry Potter when I was six or seven (in the second grade), got scared halfway through Chamber of Secrets, and stopped for a while. Then, after attending the seventh book release party that summer, I decided that I would read the entire series. And I did. I was still seven at the time, but I could handle everything the books threw my way, whether it be vocabulary or violence. Sure, I was a little scared at times, but it wasn't that bad. I mostly skipped through the discussions about "snogging" and the like; when I reread the sixth book (which I generally don't reread because of Dumbledore's death and it's just my least favorite book) a year or two later, I realized I had skipped it. That was the start of my Harry Potter life, and it set the scene for my love of reading and writing and hatred of discrimination in the future. Personally, I believe it depends on the emotional maturity of the child. If they can handle the vocabulary (I started reading early, so that may have also been a factor) and they won't get too scared, I'd have them read the series. It will develop a lifelong love for reading.
Kid, 11 years old

I started and finished the Harry Potter series when I was 10. I don't think it's anymore violent or sad than Percy Jackson. The movies are scarier than the books. I think you can read the books whenever but, the movies might be later. The books also get very long so, that was kind of boring. I love the series and I recommend kids read it from 8+. I personally watched the movies when i was 7 or 8 and I did get very scared. So, the movies might be from 10+
Teen, 16 years old written by dcasey98

Harry Potter in fact is much more violent and unsuitable for a young age than the Percy Jackson series is. The Harry Potter series thematic material and content is much stronger. The Harry Potter series is a YA series, the Percy Jackson series is a Middle Grade/Children's series
Kid, 9 years old

I started reading them when i was 8, and i am halfway finished with the 6th book. I stopped cause i needed my rest at night! I useally read for a LONG time at night so :/.
Kid, 9 years old

I started reading them when i was 8, and i am halfway finished with the 6th book. I stopped cause i needed my rest at night! I useally read for a LONG time at night so :/.
Kid, 10 years old

I think that it doesn't matter your age, it matters how emotionally mature you are. You may think I was living under a rock, but I didn't hear about Harry Potter until I was eight or nine. I read all the books in third grade, with no parental help. My grandpa was the one who convinced me to by the first book in December. I did watch all the movies with my dad, though. Quite frankly, however, I believe that these reviews and blog posts should be thought of as guidelines. You, and only you, know if YOUR child can handle it.
Kid, 12 years old

I agree with you on that. I think that applies to all books. It's not the age that matters, but the maturity level.
Parent of a 5 and 9 year old written by pvavarou

It really depends on the child. If your child is mature and does not frighten easily, reading the first few books in the series should be fine. My son is 9 and extremely sensitive and imaginative. We strictly monitor what he reads and watches because frightening books/movies affect him terribly. He begged me to start reading Harry Potter early last year but I would not let him. He received the series for Christmas and has already read books 1-4. I will not let him read further though because he has been waking up several times a night with horrible nightmares. I highly doubt this is a coincidence as they started when he began reading the books. I can tell he is enthralled by the books and he says he is not scared by them but his sleep patterns speak for themselves. I know he is saying that primarily because he wants to keep on reading the rest of the books. Though I know he can read them and understand them, he is not ready for them emotionally. So we are waiting to read the rest at least another year. In regards to the movies, we watched the first 3 and will not watch any of the others until he is older as they get quite a bit scarier after the third one.
Kid, 9 years old

I read the first Harry potter when I was 5 the first hunger games at seven and city of bones at eight I saw all the Harry potter movies when they came put (except the first three which weren't out)
Parent of a 6, 6, 9, 13, 14, and 15 year old written by craftygirl202

This "advice" make teens look like scaredy-cat wimps who can't handle just a bit of gore. I watched The Hunger Games when I was 9. I was Arachnophobia when I was 4 and Jurassic Park when I was 5. I first started reading the first and second Harry Potter (by myself) when I was 6. I read the third-sixth ones when I was 7, and the last book when I was 8. I wasn't scared a bit and could handle the vocabulary in these books. Now 11, I am currently rereading all the books. I have watched all the movies, and the sixth-eighth movies in a movie theatre. I watched the first movie when I was 5. No problems. Please stop underestimating us!!! We are not two year olds.
Parent written by kmgs

I would like to say I am 19 and I may not have my own kids but I do have a brother that is six and many younger cousins and I have been a nanny for a while. I started reading Harry Potter when I was about six and my cousin did as well (he's only a few years younger than me). I read them all through (giving appropriate space for them to come out of course). I read the previous post about how having younger children read will make teens feel that they can't read it. I don't believe that is true because most teens grew up with it and any teens that want/wanted to read it have and those who didn't haven't and they won't. So it's best to have them grow up with it. Now,I understand the developmental arguments and how children pick up on the mean spiritedness of the books and start to pick on children. I don't want to tell people how to raise their kids but it's sort of the parent's fault for not sitting down with their children and explaining what is happening in the story and how they need to act. I'm sorry to say but instead of trying to eliminate an outside reason for your children being mean perhaps you as a parent should teach them that it's wrong. Also, not all children develop the same. For example the first book mentions death, some children don't really understand this concept until they are much older but some do. It's all on life experiences. My brother understands death in a way that most children his age don't. People in our family have died and my parents have sat him down and explained exactly what that means. Also, with him have three significantly older siblings (I'm closest in age to him with two older brothers in their mid to late 20s) he understands things that are teenage and up. He started reading on his own when he was about 2 and at six and in first grade he is reading at a fourth grade reading level but my parents always sit down with him and talk about what he's reading. It's not about age and restricting children due to their age is doing more harm then good. My parent's don't push my brother to read anything. They don't even really suggest, they take him to the bookstore and the library and he chooses what he wants (within reason if he were to pick out a sex book or something then I'm sure that wouldn't be purchased). I agree that its up to the parents to help explain but any good parent would take the time to actually give attention to their child to help them understand things. Overall, I believe that it's dependent on the child, not necessarily on their ability to read it but to understand it and whether they have the parents or older siblings to help them understand or the life experiences to understand.
Adult written by mandeebobandee

I am in my mid-twenties now, so I had no choice but to space out the reading when it came to the later books. =P However, I read the first and second books when I was 10 years old, and I felt that it was a very good age to start. It was easy to relate to a hero that was close to my own age, and at age 10, you could fantasize about your own Hogwarts letter coming when you turned 11 (though it never happened, much to our disappointment). I think the proper age to read each book depends largely on the child, as well as how involved a parent is. I will agree, regardless, that the later books shouldn't just be given to younger children with the expectation that they can read them alone. Books four through seven really start to explore deeper and darker themes, and the further you go in the series, the more adult-oriented the themes get. This makes sense when you think about it - We are journeying with Harry Potter through his adolescence. By the time we reached the seventh book, Harry is just on the cusp of adulthood, and it shows in the subject matter.
written by Anonymous

I had watched the first 3 films by the time I was 4 and my mum said because the rest were '12's' not PG's I had to read the books so between the age's of 5-10 I read all the books and then got to watch all the films whilst they were coming out in the cinema. I have no problem with letting kids watch and read these stories. but some kids are more easily scared than other so watch out.
Educator and Parent written by RhetCultureMom

This article is very wrong about the age recommendations for Harry Potter books and movies. Appropriate age for Harry Potter series: Start Book 1 (Sorcerer's Stone) sometime around 11-13 years old, as a read-aloud book. Do not just hand it to your kid. These books should be enjoyed together and discussed. After you finish the first one, pace out the others over the next 2-3 years, reading other (ideally, classic) books in between (David Copperfield? Swallows and Amazons?). Then watch the movies together! Scariness is hardly the only reason to reserve a book (or series, or movie, or series of movies) for an older kid. Alex, thanks for your story and your comments. I'm betting that if the kids in your school were exposed to Harry Potter, then they were also introduced to other media that were not age-appropriate, probably by well-meaning, over-eager parents and teachers. This helps to explain why they were so insensitive to another kid's pain. They didn't see him as Harry because although they read the book, and they liked it... they didn't really get it. The fact is, age-appropriateness is not about how sensitive your kid is, or how good a reader your kid is. It's not even about the immediate reaction your kid displays. (In fact that kind of "depends-on-your-kid" thinking leads both kids and adults to believe that it's somehow more mature and better for kids to be able to "deal with" or "handle" troubling images, language, and concepts without registering anything emotionally. But in fact more mature is not better. Colder or more suppressed emotional response is not better. Feeling fine when you've just seen something awful is not a good thing.) What matters is that the media we take in will powerfully influence who we are, and the younger we are, the more quickly and powerfully we are shaped by what we see. Children always learn from what they witness, even if they seem untouched. They learn without trying, without even meaning to, and in fact without being able to help it. I have a teaching certificate in Montessori (early childhood) education, an MA in Liberal Arts, and an MA in Literary Studies. For over ten years, I have been teaching college courses on interpreting and creating ethical messages in various media. I've taught gifted and talented high school freshmen and sophomores, and I currently lead a writing group for kids grades 1-8, as well as a Shakespeare reading group. I'm also a mom with 4 awesome kids, ages infant to 13. Because of all this, I love the Common Sense Media site! Here's what I think: Parents and teachers both tend to overestimate children's ability to cope with mean-spiritedness in books and movies. Mean-spiritedness is probably the MOST IMPORTANT feature to watch out for in children's media. Avoid meanness and crassness in movies and books, and you will have a sweeter, more fun, and more confident child than most. This is harder to do than you might think, since most children's media is full of it. But Harry Potter is complex; the characters are not purely mean-spirited, though they are all a little damaged, just like the people around us. It's great to start the series at about age 12-13 (or perhaps age 11, Harry's age when the series begins?) and progress slowly through it. Although parents giving it to their little kids may be pleased to see how interested their children are in reading, or how enthusiastic their children are about the very important (and ultimately positive) social and spiritual messages in the HP series, their kids are not in a great position. There are other great books for young kids, and other ways to share important messages. There are many, many wonderful books out there for elementary-aged kids, books that will deepen and intensify kids' understanding of themselves and others around them, and also provide magic and freedom and surprise and adventure and delight...without the teenage themes of HP. The problems encountered by Harry and his friends are really adolescent issues, and by that I mean, issues that it's beneficial for adolescents to explore and reflect on. So, along with making young kids immerse themselves in a teenage world (sad) the other side of this problem of HP being pushed on young readers and viewers is that teenagers--now being taught to think of HP as a story for little kids--are pushed *out* of the experience that Rowling created specifically with them (i.e, her own kids!) in mind. What a gift J.K. Rowling has given her readers, in narrativizing the longing for a personal calling, for unconditional love, for the opportunity to sacrifice oneself for one's friends! (To say nothing of the longing for an intact family, for freedom from materialism and mass-media-saturated culture, for serious engagement with school and learning--learning how to do something real and powerful...at school!, for friendships based on shared ethical goals and mutual trust, for self-respect and caring self-control in erotic relationships, for an answer to the problem of evil...) Teenagers need stories like this to immerse themselves in, and I think that adults benefit from reading them, too, especially if they help us to understand teenagers better. For one thing, the stories ennoble adolescents and their tendencies to act a little crazy. We should all remember that what most adolescents want are true heroes, values to live by, a worthy challenge, a chance to give their all to something truly great, and ultimately a legitimately earned place in a world of adults they can respect. They are ready to laugh at themselves (and everybody else), but they need something pure, and they deserve it. They have tremendous power and intrinsic individual worth, and yet they are still to a great extent reflections of their parents and the other adults who have influenced them. (Just like the kids in the Harry Potter books.) These books are a wonderful way to reflect on school culture as well as much, much bigger issues with our teenagers...but this is going to work much better if we don't push the books on our kids when they are still too young to fully appreciate them. At elementary age, kids are still open enough to enjoy and benefit from more idealistic, less provocative (and yes, less scary) stories. Lord of the Rings is an example of a book that is just as magical and awe-inspiring, but far less emotionally complex. Scariness...sure. But who cares? In deciding age-appropriateness, the important thing is that the characters are emotionally simple, the world in it is manageable, not close to our big, confusing lifeworld. In Tolkein, unlike Rowling, relationships are no more complicated than a child's vision of families and society. HP is worth saving for adolescents (or middle schoolers, seeing adolescence on the horizon and needing a friend in HP, to accompany them into it). Meanwhile, little kids' innocence is worth protecting.
Parent of a 10 and 12 year old written by TubinReuben

Excellent post. Thanks RhetCultureMom for bringing some good thought to this discussion. I agree with your comment that "Scariness is hardly the only reason to reserve a book".
Parent written by Inquiring Mom

Hallelujah! I totally agree with you! My daughter (9) has read the first four Harry Potter books and that is as far as I will let her go. I honestly wouldn't have started them at all, however, they were available at school and encouraged by the teacher. So, after reading as much as I could on the web about the age appropriateness of the books, I reluctantly let her read the first three. Of course she was totally hooked and wanted to continue. Again, I read more about it and decided 4 was probably "okay," but I would definitely make her wait for the rest. I also discussed this with her teacher (i.e. NO book five and up). Well, yesterday, she came home with book five from the classroom, begging to read it (citing who else was reading it). I have repeatedly told her "No," however, I came here again to have more to say to her as to "Why not?" I completely agree with what you have said! I find that I am one of few moms who feel this way about movies and books that my kids are exposed to. Even I feel the pressure from other parents. There are many animated movies that we won't take our kids to see because of irreverent/rude language and attitudes, not to mention violence of some kind. I feel as though they make those movies to appeal to the parents so that they will actually take their kids to the movie. Even Winnie the Pooh had scary parts for very young children. My son, who was 3 or 4 at the time, had to hide his eyes! Winnie the Pooh! Actually, even his older sister cowered a little in her seat. Can't they just have a nice "little kid" movie where simple obstacles are overcome or lessons learned, or that's just plain fun? WHY is everyone interested in having kids accelerate through childhood? It's so brief!(New Paragraph) How do you feel about a third grader reading The Giver? It is a very good, thought-provoking book, however, I DO NOT feel it should be available in an elementary school library. This was another book my daughter had in her backpack that I sent back. I just finished it myself to see if what I'd read about it's age appropriateness was on target. I think junior high is as young as I would go! So, as someone else asked, do you have any appropriate recommendations (in addition to Tolkien or C.S. Lewis) for the 7-10 year-old range? My daughter's reading level is high and the school wants her to read books at or above her level, so, finding appropriate books is a real challenge (okay, nightmare). Thanks for taking the time to write your opinion!
Parent written by mama mooki

I am grateful for your post and agree with your ideas. My children attend a school in which reading flashcards are fed at age 1, standardized testing is applauded and Harry Potter is pushed before first grade (because it proves that kids are smart). I completely disagree with all of this. I would love to see YOUR list of good books for 7-10-year-olds! I count on Common Sense Media for a first look at the appropriateness of books and films, but find that I disagree with some of the conclusions. I teach media studies at a college and have my own ideas about the influence of media messages - most similar to yours. Thank you for any good list. We just finished reading Sharon Draper's Out of My Mind, which we enjoyed together. The characters were not very complex, but we had some nice conversations about many themes in the book.
Parent written by Alex Umay

I am a teacher of elementary aged children with a MFA focus on media literacy. I believe that Harry Potter should not be read by children under 12-13. A friend who teaches at an elementary school for gifted children agrees. Most of the series was written for adults. Just because your young child can read the words doesn't mean their brains are able to conceptually understand the meanings being expressed. This is a cognitive fact. Maybe the first two books can go younger but only if you as a parent are willing to do the teaching work required, reading and breaking down the meaning for your child. In my sons 1st grade class (ages 6-7) a group of boys were reading Harry Potter and immediately started a HP club. Of course they continued past the first two books. By the end of the school year one of the boys was singled out and bullied by the others. He was so traumatized that he was crying and throwing up in the mornings not wanting to go to school. Ursula Kroeber Le Guin, an American author of novels, children's books, and short stories, mainly in the genres of fantasy and science fiction stated that the HP series was, "ethically rather mean-spirited." Clearly the boys picked up on that! The unfortunate thing is that parents' egos sometimes override the reality of what their young children's brains can conceptually handle. As for the movies, please use the ratings the film industry provides. Films are a different beast. Just because your child read the book doesn't mean watching the movie is appropriate. There is no reason to traumatize your children.
Kid, 10 years old

I heart all of the books! I've read the whole series, (and yes, in books 5-7 it is really dark and creepy) but they are still age-appropriate for tweens-teens.
Teen, 16 years old written by saibhandari

I don't this is true for all kids. I started reading the first book aged 4 or 5? and then I read all the books that were out at the time, before watching the films. as I grew up more books were released and I read them accordingly. The same with the video-games. This article doesn't give kids enough credit!
Kid, 12 years old

My mom says I can read them when I'm thirteen. Waiting... waiting... waiting...
Teen, 14 years old written by JTDB

It all depends on what you think your kids can read. If you have a sensitive child who bursts into uncontrollable tears when they see a dead bird then it probably wouldnt be wise to let them read the last few books, but on the other hand if your child is mature and strong enough to deal with life and death etc etc then it should be no problem.
Kid, 11 years old

I read the whole Harry Potter series when I was 7-8. I finished Deathly Hallows right before I went into third grade. I thought it was a really good series, and I understood most of it, but I keep rereading and discovering new things. Sometimes I think I should have been a little older when I read it... But hey, I read the whole Hunger Games series at 10.
Teen, 13 years old written by Tildathetimelord

I read Harry Potter at 7 and i saw each movie as they came out. There was nothing that I found particuarly disturbing and if I didn't understand it, i definitely did by the 10th time 'round.
Kid, 11 years old

I am going to be 11 in a few days and I have watched and loved all of the HP movies. At our school we have had Harry Potter and the Sorcerers' Stone read to us, and the 7 year olds love it. Nevertheless, don't watch the movies until you're 12 at least if you don't like passionate kissing and death of beloved characters.
Adult written by koujokakyuu

I would say no to the movies and their questionable edits. Consider enjoying Jim Dale's audiobooks as a family: a great way to keep the magic alive.
Teen, 13 years old written by MadeW98

I totally agree with this! that is how i split my reading up (my parents arent big bookies so i started reading by myself)
Kid, 11 years old

Oh my gosh. If you think your kid is going to react that way if they read a HP book, don't give it to them! Harry Potter is amazing.


Common Sense Media is working with PubExchange to share content from a select group of publishers. These are not ads. We receive no payment, and our editors have vetted each partner and hand-select articles we think you'll like. By clicking and leaving this site, you may view additional content that has not been approved by our editors.