Parent reviews for Alba: A Wildlife Adventure

Six year old had been totally loving this game: positive environmental messages, exploring, keeping track of different tasks, meeting friends through the island (plus natural reading practice, very motivated to figure out what was going on)... It was a weekend adventure, very sweet, and would have been five stars. Nearing the end, the story takes a seriously negative turn that was decidedly not relaxing and felt like such a different tone from all that had been leading up to that point [SPOILER]: the story line now involved a corrupt politician and nasty businessman acting threateningly towards kids, who are on their own facing them. Got through that cynical patch by looking at how speaking up triumphs. Phew. But that was promptly followed by a serious fire (likely arson) causing the main character to need to evacuate the island in the middle of the night; however, she doesn't listen to her grownup to stay put and runs back into the danger. Now instead of taking the child's perspective, you abruptly switch to the terrified grownup's point of view as he runs back into the burning island trying to find her - this was incredibly upsetting to our sensitive kid. You're even running slower due to the character being older. The icing on the cake: we could not find the main character! The anxiety built and we abandoned the game and had to do a lot of processing of all these issues. I'm sure it works out fine in the end - if you can get through this unexpected dose of dramatic tension and peril. Would have loved a warning on the nature of this peril ahead of time.

I like the nature restoration and information seeking part of this game and that the text communication of characters in the game helps support reading skills for young kids. I disliked how independent Alba is in the game without an adult or older kid along side her, and how later in the game she is tasked with problem-solving actions that are the responsibility of older individuals and unsafe for a child (e.g., an objective involves Alba spying on adults/an authority figure), she is treated in quite a harsh way by an adult (e.g., an adult man lights on fire, Alba’s petition with signatures she has collected right in front of her and uses demeaning words and a frustrated facial expression towards her), and the end of the game involves - as another parent mentioned in a review - scary elements that are not indicated on this website, the game advertising, the age rating on the App Store, or anything else in the prior gameplay elements. I had my child stop playing the game after the report came to me regarding the concerning interaction with the adult person in the game. I came to this website to see if I could get any more information, and was surprised to find out another parent had a similar experience with their child, that the game was rated here to have no violent or scary content, and that there was even more even more scary content that my child had not yet encountered. Obviously, the rating of 5 years old here make sense if the game weren’t played all the way through, because that is how the game is promoted. Towards the end of the game, Alba is doing things that are more in line with activities of a teenager and the content involves things that are more common in the narratives for teens, but she’s presented as a young kid on a safe island. The age rating on the App Store of 4 years old, is quite inappropriate. While my seven-year-old daughter was not really scared by the interaction with the adult, it was concerning for her and resulted in a lot of questions and conversation related to the interaction. She has some fears of fire, and as most kids her age, still has to do a lot of information processing when it comes to interpreting the more complex conflicts and emotional dysregulation of adults. It’s disappointing because earlier parts of the game where Alba is exploring an island in a safe community, and exploring, learning about, and restoring wildlife habitat are all things I value and think are unique for a video game.

I like this game due to the realism in its environments and the message that wildlife should be protected, but the only thing I don't like about it is the use of modern slang, mainly used by the character Ines. She often exclaims "YAS!", a butchered form of the word "yes", when she's happy or excited about something, which leads me to believe that the creators of the game made her do it just to show how "hip" and "cool" she can be with the kids. It makes me cringe that a 10-year-old girl is using that kind of lingo. I don't like it when a game or cartoon uses outdated slang like "yas" (which for some reason is still being used by some people to this day) to try to remain hip with today's kids. I think they could've done a better job. Maybe have Ines say something else in place of "yas"? Maybe "HEYYYY!" or "YOOOOO!" when she greets Alba in the beginning of the game, "Yay" or "Yeah" when they fix the bridge and get close to receiving all the petition signatures they need, and perhaps a cry of “YESSSS!" (with an E, not an A) when they finally get all the signatures. That might make the game a little better to play, since Ines wouldn't be trying to be "cool" and "relevant". Other than that, it's a good game. I think the creators could do away with the cringe-inducing modern slang that Ines uses, though.

seirously boring, and the art is rlly not my taste. but to each their own.

My daughter flexed her reading skills following the text-based dialogue and learned about birds and environmental issues, all while having fun.