Monster Hunters: Nightmare Academy: Book 1

Book review by
Matt Berman, Common Sense Media
Monster Hunters: Nightmare Academy: Book 1 Book Poster Image
Familiar and predictable but lots of fun.

Parents say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Kids say

age 9+
Based on 3 reviews

Did this review miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive, diverse representations in books, TV shows, and movies. Want to help us help them? Suggest a diversity update

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this book.

Positive Messages

Much sexist talk by the characters.


Magical fighting, a monster's arm is severed, people are reduced to ash, a boy beats up another boy, a boy has his toe bitten off by a monster, a monster's eyes are cut off, two monsters fight and tear each other open.


A kiss.


A bit of mild swearing.


Frozen drink, mp3 player brands.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Adults drink whiskey.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that there is some fantasy violence here, not especially graphic, some mild swearing, and several of the characters engage in sexist talk.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

Kid, 12 years old November 22, 2011
Kid, 10 years old April 2, 2011

Great for anyone over 8

A great book, even though the storyline is quite predictable it is a great read an I got totally hooked on this book.

What's the story?

Charlie discovers that he has the power to bring monsters into our world from the Netherworld -- in fact his power may be the strongest ever -- so he is taken to Nightmare Academy to learn how to control his power and use it to help the Nightmare Division keep the world free of monsters. But once there he accidentally opens a portal to Barakkas, one of the Named, the four most powerful monsters, and discovers a plot by the Named to unleash the monsters of the Netherworld on Earth.

Is it any good?

Lorey joins the ranks of screenwriters who've made the transition to children's books and found that their cinematic skills stand them in good stead in their new endeavor. Let's grant all the obvious criticism right up front: Yes, this bears more than a passing similarity to the story of another boy who goes off to boarding school to learn magic. Yes, the plot is derivative and predictable, and the characters are flat clichés. But if the variations are intriguing, the action exciting, and the pacing tight, it hardly matters. This book is just fun.

Visual imagination, crisp pacing, and clear plotlines are helpful, if not essential, for both, and Lorey has those down pat. This may not be great literature, but it's well-written, and does what it sets out to do quite well. Many kids, including some who are nearing but not quite ready for Rowling, and others who are reluctant readers, will find lots to enjoy here.

From the Book:
Towering over him, it raised its long, curved stinger, preparing to strike. A thick, poisonous-looking fluid oozed from the tip. Charlie's knees went watery and he dropped to the ground.

"Don't," he said.

The monster's tail whistled furiously down toward him with the force of a sledgehammer.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about the Rowling formula. Does it bother you when books follow a similar path to the Harry Potter books? Or do you like it? What makes one version of the formula successful and another not? How is this one different from Harry Potter? Is it the similarities or differences that you like? Did Rowling invent the formula, or can you think of similar stories that came before her?

Book details

Our editors recommend

Top advice and articles

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality.

Learn how we rate