Return to the Hundred Acre Wood



An adequate sequel, but it misses the magic.

What parents need to know

Educational value

The characters make many mistakes in spelling and general knowledge which young readers may enjoy recognizing and correcting.

Positive messages

Shows the power of imagination.

Positive role models

Christopher Robin is a model of the kind of imaginative play that is fast disappearing today.

Violence & scariness

Owl pulls Tigger's tail and boxes Roo's ears.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that there's little to be concerned with here: a mention of drinking whiskey, a bike brand, and an ear-boxing by an annoyed Owl.

Parents say

Not yet rated
Review this title!

What's the story?

Christopher Robin returns to the Wood, a bit older and more grown-up, to spend a summer with his old friends Pooh, Piglet, Owl, Rabbit, Kanga, Tigger, and Roo, as well as a new friend, an otter named Lottie. Together they play cricket, set up a school, search for missing bees, and have other gentle adventures.

Is it any good?


For reasons that pass understanding, someone decided a sequel was needed to Milne's original books, and Milne's estate gave its permission -- a big mistake. Author David Benedictus and artist Mark Burgess do their best to imitate the style of the original, and do a decent job of it. But, predictably, the one-of-a-kind magic that imbued the original, born of a father's love for his son in a time long past, is gone.

What's left here is not terrible. Were it not attempting to follow in the footsteps of a classic, it might even be considered a pleasant enough set of bedtime stories. For children who have read the originals and clamor for more, this is passable. But if your children haven't read the originals, and especially if the Disney movie versions have convinced them it's for babies, go there first. Milne's works are timeless, enchanting, and a more challenging read than most kids might suspect. They should be a part of everyone's childhood.

Burgess does a decent job of imitating Ernest H. Shepard. Though PIglet looks wrong, and Christopher Robin looks like he has aged much more than a year since the last book, the illustrations are pleasant and occasionally amusing.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about sequels to classics. Have you read the original books? How does this compare? In what ways is the writing similar and different? The pictures?

  • Why do publishers have authors write sequels to deceased authors' books? Why are authors willing to do it? Why would Milne's estate allow it?

  • If you were an author, would you want to write a sequel to a book you loved? Would you be happy if someone wrote a sequel to one of your books after you died?

Book details

Author:David Benedictus
Illustrator:Mark Burgess
Book type:Fiction
Publisher:Penguin Group
Publication date:October 1, 2009
Number of pages:201
Publisher's recommended age(s):8 - 12
Read aloud:7
Read alone:9

This review of Return to the Hundred Acre Wood was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Kid, 9 years old April 9, 2010

Whinnie the pooh is not babyish!

You know what! I am 9 and i loved this book, I just loved it! You know people might say it is " babyish" or " boring" but it really is not at all, it is really entertaining! The only reason i said for ages 8 and up was because it is a chapter book. Mabye littler kids could have their parents read it to them, and a 16 year old just give the book a chance and see the whinnie the pooh is not always " babyish!" Also do not go on saying " Oh, on common sense media i read a rating from a 9 year old and said that she liked whinnie the pooh:0" well give the poor honey loving bear a chance and read the book!
What other families should know
Great messages
Great role models


Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Star Wars Guide