Return to the Hundred Acre Wood

Book review by
Matt Berman, Common Sense Media
Return to the Hundred Acre Wood Book Poster Image
An adequate sequel, but it misses the magic.

Parents say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Kids say

age 8+
Based on 1 review

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this book.

Educational Value

The characters make many mistakes in spelling and general knowledge which young readers may enjoy recognizing and correcting.

Positive Messages

Shows the power of imagination.

Positive Role Models & Representations

Christopher Robin is a model of the kind of imaginative play that is fast disappearing today.

Violence & Scariness

Owl pulls Tigger's tail and boxes Roo's ears.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that there's little to be concerned with here: a mention of drinking whiskey, a bike brand, and an ear-boxing by an annoyed Owl.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

Kid, 9 years old April 9, 2010

Whinnie the pooh is not babyish!

You know what! I am 9 and i loved this book, I just loved it! You know people might say it is " babyish" or " boring" but it really is not a... Continue reading

What's the story?

Christopher Robin returns to the Wood, a bit older and more grown-up, to spend a summer with his old friends Pooh, Piglet, Owl, Rabbit, Kanga, Tigger, and Roo, as well as a new friend, an otter named Lottie. Together they play cricket, set up a school, search for missing bees, and have other gentle adventures.

Is it any good?

For reasons that pass understanding, someone decided a sequel was needed to Milne's original books, and Milne's estate gave its permission -- a big mistake. Author David Benedictus and artist Mark Burgess do their best to imitate the style of the original, and do a decent job of it. But, predictably, the one-of-a-kind magic that imbued the original, born of a father's love for his son in a time long past, is gone.

What's left here is not terrible. Were it not attempting to follow in the footsteps of a classic, it might even be considered a pleasant enough set of bedtime stories. For children who have read the originals and clamor for more, this is passable. But if your children haven't read the originals, and especially if the Disney movie versions have convinced them it's for babies, go there first. Milne's works are timeless, enchanting, and a more challenging read than most kids might suspect. They should be a part of everyone's childhood.

Burgess does a decent job of imitating Ernest H. Shepard. Though PIglet looks wrong, and Christopher Robin looks like he has aged much more than a year since the last book, the illustrations are pleasant and occasionally amusing.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about sequels to classics. Have you read the original books? How does this compare? In what ways is the writing similar and different? The pictures?

  • Why do publishers have authors write sequels to deceased authors' books? Why are authors willing to do it? Why would Milne's estate allow it?

  • If you were an author, would you want to write a sequel to a book you loved? Would you be happy if someone wrote a sequel to one of your books after you died?

Book details

For kids who love Classics and animals

Our editors recommend

Top advice and articles

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate