A Sound of Thunder
- Review Date: November 28, 2006
- Rated: PG-13
- Genre: Science Fiction
- Release Year: 2005
- Running Time: 101 minutes
Common Sense Media says
Ridiculous at every level. Save your money.
- Review Date: November 28, 2006
- Rated: PG-13
- Genre: Science Fiction
- Release Year: 2005
- Running Time: 101 minutes
A Sound of Thunder gallery
What parents need to know
Violence
Sex
Language
Consumerism
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Parents Need to Know
Parents need to know that this movie is dismally inept: the special effects are laughably bad and the plot is incoherent. What's more, it features violence in various forms: Time travelers shoot and kill dinosaurs, and they're menaced by variously mutated creatures (half primate/half reptile, flying batlike monsters, large roach-like insects). These scenes -- in the dark among trees, in a dark and flooded subway tunnel -- might be frightening for younger viewers. A couple's one-night stand is indicated by his emergence from the bedroom in his boxers, while she appears only partly covered. One character shoots himself in the head (not graphically, but obviously), and another sacrifices himself to a herd of creatures in order to save his friends.
User reviews
Parents say
Kids say
What's the story?
In A SOUND OF THUNDER, ultimate corporate villain Charles Hatton (Ben Kingsley) owns Time Safari Inc., an agency that sends rich folks back 63 million years so that they can shoot allosauruses. Based very loosely on a short story by Ray Bradbury, the movie's premise is that killing these mighty reptiles does not affect the future, but that the smooshing of a single butterfly causes havoc in 2055, the movie's present. Go-back team leader and scientist Travis Ryer (Edward Burns) shows his distaste for the scheme, but goes along for the ride anyway. When a time travel "jump" goes wrong, Chicago's winter days are suddenly balmy, trees grow through walls, pavement cracks, power goes out, and the city is devoid of people. Travis meets with Sonia Rand (Catherine McCormack), the angry scientist who invented the technology, who explains that more changes will come via "time waves," wavy-shadowy effects that wash over the city. Sonia jerry-rigs a power supply to send Travis back. Travis, Sonia, and tech officer Payne (David Oyelowo) must make their way through flooded subway tunnels and battle a gigantic, anaconda-like mutated eel. Will Travis will be able to get back in time and erase all of the devastation?
Is it any good?
QUALITY
Ridiculous at every level, A Sound of Thunder has a weak premise, an absurd plot, and is riddled with clichés. Characters are standard one-dimensional -- Travis is the reluctantly macho hero, Sonia is the brains, and the black guy -- tech officer Payne (David Oyelowo) -- sacrifices himself so the rest of the team can reach their destination (this with the promise that Travis will be able to get back in time and "fix it," meaning that all this devastation will be erased. If only the same might be done for A Sound of Thunder.
Families can talk about...
Families can talk about the poor planning by the time-traveling, so-called scientists: how can they imagine their hunting of prehistoric creatures won't affect the future (their present) in some way? How does Travis recover his sense of self-confidence and -respect by saving the world?
Movie details
| Theatrical release date: | September 2, 2005 |
| DVD release date: | March 28, 2006 |
| Cast: | Ben Kingsley, Catherine McCormack, Edward Burns |
| Director: | Peter Hyams |
| Studio: | Warner Bros. |
| Genre: | Science Fiction |
| Run time: | 101 minutes |
| MPAA rating: | PG-13 |
| MPAA explanation: | sci-fi violence, partial nudity and language |
Great handpicked alternatives
Browse more movies
Top advice and articles
What parents and kids say
Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines
QUALITY
Pretty good
pretty good not the worst movie in the world but not the best, for sure
Was this review useful?
QUALITY
It's been awhile, but...
I saw this movie about three or four years ago, and can now remember only small portions of it and a few details. I only remember watching it at all because we just read the short story of the same name by Ray Bradbury. (which was pretty good) I remember it as pretty cheesy, but it apparently had enough action to keep an eleven-year-old entertained during the entire movie. I'd definitely recommend the short story over the movie, but the movie wasn't bad, and I'll probably watch it again someday soon.
Was this review useful?
QUALITY
Pure fantasy
This was a great action film...based on fantasy. We totally loved the ending. Our 13yr old daughter thought it was fun.
Was this review useful?
Poll
What are the different ways that you access Common Sense Media ratings and information? (Check all that apply)
What are the different ways that you access Common Sense Media ratings and information? (Check all that apply)
Total votes: 760