Arthur (1981)

Name: Arthur (1981)
Item: Arthur (1981)
Rating: 4
Author: Charles Cassady Jr.

Movie review by

Charles Cassady Jr., Common Sense Media

Common Sense says

age 13+

(i)

Sweet-spirited '80s comedy with lots of drinking.

PG
1981
97 minutes

Save

Rate movie

Watch or buy

Parents say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Kids say

age 13+

Based on 8 reviews

Get it now

Searching for streaming and purchasing options ...

Common Sense is a nonprofit organization. Your purchase helps us remain independent and ad-free.

Get it now on

Searching for streaming and purchasing options ...

X of Y

Official trailer

Arthur (1981)

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

Ultimate message is about growing up -- ironically, because Arthur is adult, but his money (and drinking) let him play and act more like a lad all his life. Side message seems to be that the working classes are nicer than the rich, but once in a while an eccentric like Arthur (and, to a lesser extent, Hobson) can cross over.

Positive Role Models & Representations

Butler Hobson is a caring father figure who isn't afraid to tell Arthur exactly what he thinks of his lifestyle and behavior, while somehow still remaining kind. Oft-drunken Arthur is "heroic" in that he would sacrifice his fortune for love -- although we find out it's no a great risk after all. Wealthy are portrayed as practically a different species, ruthless and predatory. Arthur's dad says the wealthy are all "criminals." The villain, a non-drinker, is a threatening hunter and killer (as though those go hand-in-hand). Working-class Linda shoplifts. One character of color is a dignified chauffeur.

Violence

One threatened stabbing. Arthur gets beaten up.

Sex

Arthur drunkenly flirts with a couple of prostitutes and is shown the next day, non-explicitly naked, waking up in bed with one (she mentions that her father's raping her determined her path in life). Arthur jokes about sexually-transmitted diseases. His classy aunt speaks of Arthur's "erection" and promiscuity.

Language

"Dick," the s-word, "screw," "hell," "Goddamn it," "bastard," "asshole."

Consumerism

Mention of the "Simonizing" process, the NYC clothing store Bergdorf-Goodman, emblems of credit-card companies and florists. Mention of the video-game then-sensation Space Invaders.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Alcohol drinking by Arthur is regular and intense. When he's not drunk he's often drinking in order to get drunk or in the process of ordering more drinks (doubles preferably). Some other characters also drink -- a lot. Linda smokes cigarettes.

Set limits for violence and more with Plus

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this popular '80s comedy turns time and again to comical drinking and drunkenness. Though some of it is played for pathos and sadness, the slurred-speech joviality and teetering gait is usually upbeat and funny. The title character, a multi-millionaire playboy, picks up prostitutes and is shown the next morning in bed with one (who speaks about incest in her history). There is some light swearing that doesn't go beyond the "s" word.

Wondering if Arthur (1981) is OK for your kids?

Set preferences and get age-appropriate recommendations with Common Sense Media Plus. Join now

User Reviews

Parents say
Kids say

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

Teen, 15 years old Written bySerene568 January 4, 2019

age 15+

Arthur

This movie is not for young ones, but older viewers will love the humor, the acting and the characters in the movie. This movie gets the title of one of the bes... Continue reading

Report this review

Teen, 14 years old Written byJoker912 November 20, 2016

age 13+

Hilarious

One of the funniest films ever!

Report this review

What's the story?

During a Christmas season in New York City, Arthur Bach (Dudley Moore), a lifelong wastrel with a $750 million family fortune, spends his time, as always, having fun -- clowning, partying, driving his private race car, and, most of all, drinking to excess. Despite Arthur's womanizing (with a few prostitutes in the opener), his father decides to marry Arthur off to a girl from another super-rich family for stability and decorum. But while Arthur is gallivanting around his best friend, disapproving butler and father-figure Hobson (Sir John Gielgud), he meets and hits it off with a free-spirited would-be actress, Linda (Liza Minnelli), who works as a waitress. Will money- and alcohol-addicted Arthur call off the wedding so he can be with impoverished Linda?

Is it any good?

ARTHUR was a crowd-pleasing "sleeper" in its day, with a witty screwball-comedy mien that hearkened back to golden-age screen comedies of yesteryear. (Though swearing and very light sex is something past censors wouldn't have permitted.) It also offers the Hollywood-wish-fullfillment of a poor little rich girl/guy who just needs someone to love him for who he is, not his millions. Kid viewers can especially relate to Arthur's giddy immaturity, his toys, and his slightly wistful need to make everyone laugh (so they'll like him).

It's the boozing part that's iffy material. Dudley Moore's character isn't sloshed continually -- it just feels that way. Think Popeye with his spinach, when Arthur grabs a bottle to get giggly and uninhibited enough to confront stuffy relatives and peers. Moreover, Arthur's one of the most "enabled" alcoholics ever, with an entourage and two attractive, non-gold-digging females vying to pamper him. In a way this flick is a shallow male fantasy, but, just like Hobson the sarcastic butler, viewers learn to love Arthur anyway for his innate decency and harmlessness. If only all drinkers were like that.

Talk to your kids about ...

Families can talk about the choices Arthur makes. Do you really think he's going to sober up and be a better person in the end? A more sentimental (and less successful) sequel, Arthur 2: On the Rocks, attempted sincerely to address that question.
Ask kids what they think their lives would be like if they were raised like Arthur, in a mega-rich environment without responsibilities. What messages does this film send about immense wealth?
Does this film go too far in making drunkenness look positive and consequence-free?