Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction

Movie review by
Cynthia Fuchs, Common Sense Media
Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction Movie Poster Image
Very graphic sequel. Brain cells could be lost.
  • R
  • 2006
  • 114 minutes

Parents say

age 18+
Based on 1 review

Kids say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Did this review miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive, diverse representations in books, TV shows, and movies. Want to help us help them? Suggest a diversity update

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

Novelist may be a murderer; cop may be corrupt; analyst may be a murderer: they're all selfish and cocky and unsympathetic.


Car crashes through glass into a river and character drowns in first scene; dead bodies include naked men in bed (one hung with a strap, another with syringe in his arm), and a woman (dying when found) with her throat slit; Glass fights some men in a bar; Glass tries to strangle and drown Catherine; shooting and painful hand-to-hand struggle near the end.


Movie begins with masturbation in a car while driver crashes it into a river; relentless talk about sexual activity (see ""); sound of woman moaning leads viewer to think two women are having sex in a public bathroom, but it turns out to be a woman dying (her throat is cut); Catherine chokes Glass during sex in S/M scene; Catherine wears a blouse that shows her nipples; several sex scenes show naked bodies (bottoms, breasts, legs); brief references to lesbianism as taunt to Glass (nothing visible); a man is left dead/naked, hung by his bedpost (pillow is left in his lap); Catherine shows her naked breasts.


Frequent use of the f-word (several times as slang for sexual activity); one use of c-word.


Ferrari Spider (car).

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Catherine smokes cigarettes frequently; Milena smokes once; characters drink liquor, Catherine smokes a joint.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie is a hard R, with frequent sexual language and activity, nudity, violence, and profanity. Characters talk about murder and engage in violent acts (one shooting, a couple of fights, one attempted strangling). Characters talk about sex using crude language, and try to seduce one another with sultry looks and descriptions of sexual activity. Catherine wears revealing clothing. The dead bodies are gruesome (pale, frothing at the mouth from a drug overdose, neck bleeding). Characters buy drugs, Catherine smokes a joint, characters drink and smoke cigarettes.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written byAnAdult April 9, 2008
Kid, 12 years old April 9, 2008


This movie sucks, and it's very bad. It has killing, drugs,profanity, and YUCK! Very stupid. Very gross. If youre a kid, dont watch it for several reasons.... Continue reading

What's the story?

Sharon Stone returns as the brilliant American novelist and (maybe) psycho killer Catherine Trammel, who is now in London. This time, Catherine drives her car into the Thames, and the footballer (and very recent sex partner) in the passenger seat drowns. Questioned by grumpy Detective Washburn (David Thewlis), she resists feeling sad or guilty: "My life was more important to me than his," she says. Frustrating the cop, she's then loosed on the court-appointed Dr. Michael Glass (David Morrissey). He assesses that she is "risk addicted." She figures him out almost right away, and he has precious little support from his seeming community: he's angry at his ex, Denise (Indira Varma), for sleeping with magazine writer Adam Towers (Hugh Dancy). And Glass' mentor, Milena (Charlotte Rampling), is the simultaneously wise and clueless older woman, primed for victimization.

Is it any good?

BASIC INSTINCT 2: RISK ADDICTION is so bereft of ideas that Joe Eszterhas's 1992 script for the original seems almost gripping by comparison. You know that Glass knows he's supposed to say no to therapy with Catherine, but he says yes. The rest of the movie approximates the who's-playing-whom dynamic of the first film, but without the aptly creepy Michael Douglas or the straight-up wonderful George Dzundza. And without dialogue resembling the sorts of things people might actually say to one another.

As in the first film, the most interesting possibility comes up in the finale, when Catherine rewrites the plot for the novel that she's been writing all along. The movie essentially stalls out after the first big-action murder scene. While Catherine's guilt regarding specific cases might remain unknown, it also doesn't much matter. She's the Freddy Krueger of this two-film franchise, which means victims become negligible and motive immaterial. The fact that a middle-aged woman serves this function, and that the money shot is not some hideous-prosthetic-face reveal but a look at Stone's breasts in a Jacuzzi, makes a tired point: in 2006, women still scare men.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about the attention that middle-aged Sharon Stone has received for playing a sexy role. Why is it so surprising that she could still play this sort of role? Would it be as shocking if a man the same age played a similar role? Also, why do so many strong women in movies only derive power by using their sex appeal?

Movie details

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

Streaming options powered by JustWatch

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality.

Learn how we rate