Dirty Dancing: Havana Nights

  • Review Date: July 19, 2004
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Romance
  • Release Year: 2004
  • Running Time: 86 minutes

Common Sense Media says

Bad movie, lame plot, poor acting. Don't bother.
  • Review Date: July 19, 2004
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Romance
  • Release Year: 2004
  • Running Time: 86 minutes

Age(i)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Quality(i)

 

What parents need to know

Positive messages
Not applicable
Violence

Tense scenes of political unrest, attempted assassination.

Sex

Kissing, suggestive dancing, non-explicit sexual situation.

Language

Mild language, including an ugly racial epithet.

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Social drinking, smoking.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this movie is rated PG-13 "for sensuality," but what's here is mild compared to most PG-13 releases. As per the title, the dancing is suggestive. There is a discreet sexual situation -- a couple spends the night together on the beach and the next morning she is wearing his shirt. Characters drink and smoke and use some mild language, including an ugly racial epithet. There is some violence connected with the revolution, but nothing graphic.

Parents say

Kids say

What's the story?

DIRTY DANCING: HAVANA HEIGHTS takes place before the first movie, in 1958 Cuba, just before Castro's revolution. Kate (Romola Garai) and her family have just arrived. Her parents (James Slattery and Sela Ward) were once dancers, but gave it up to provide a conventional and comfortable home for their family. While her parents want her to spend time with the other American kids, Kate is more interested in dancing with the pool boy, Javier (Diego Luna). While her parents think she is spending time with the boy they want her to date, she is off practicing with Javier so they can enter a dance contest and he can win enough money to take his family to America.

Is it any good?

QUALITY
 

Somebody, please put this baby in a corner. Despite its name, this movie is not a sequel. In Hollywood terms, it is a "re-imagining" of the first film, which basically means it has attempted to recreate it but completely missed the point. It does not have the characters, setting, or plot of the original. It does not have the heart or the charm or the chemistry. Worst of all, it does not have the dancing. There are some slinky moves, but the camera keeps cutting away from the big dance numbers for reaction shots. Since there is barely enough of a plot to sustain a heartbeat, this probably means that the leads were not good enough dancers to do several different steps in a row, and it was intended to be distracting, pretty much defeating the entire purpose of the movie in the first place.

I have seen mayonnaise with more personality than the stars of this movie. And I have seen Jell-o with more excitement than the plot of this movie. It isn't that Garai and Luna have no chemistry with each other. They have anti-chemistry so powerful it seems to slow down the whole time-space continuum. There's a subtle reprise of the first movie's theme song and Patrick Swayze appears briefly as a dance teacher, just to underscore's this version's inferiority.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about what happened in Cuba in the 1950s and the results of the revolution led by Fidel Castro. They could talk about why Kate lied to her parents and how they feel about the way Kate blackmailed James into lying for her. Fans of the original movie could talk about what a better sequel would have included.

Movie details

Theatrical release date:February 27, 2004
DVD release date:July 20, 2004
Cast:Diego Luna, Jonathan Jackson, Romola Garai
Director:Guy Ferland
Studio:Artisan Entertainment
Genre:Romance
Run time:86 minutes
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:sensuality

This review of Dirty Dancing: Havana Nights was written by

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging, great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging, good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging, okay learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Adult Written byfieasta April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age
QUALITY
 
Adult Written bybcn1119 April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age
QUALITY
 
Teen, 14 years old Written bybookworm108 April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age
QUALITY
 

really good movie!

I loved this movie! Don't be retarded and say that you aren't watching it because you just know it's not as good as the first, even though you haven't seen it. It's really good. I do, however, think that they shouldn't have titled it what they did. It throws people off. The movie is really good!!

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Poll

What are the different ways that you access Common Sense Media ratings and information? (Check all that apply)

Essential Apps Guide