Drinking Buddies

Movie review by S. Jhoanna Robledo, Common Sense Media
Drinking Buddies Poster Image

Common Sense says

age 17+

Lots of drinking in romantic indie dramedy.

R 2013 90 minutes

Parents say

age 17+

Based on 1 review

Kids say

age 16+

Based on 3 reviews

Did we miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by suggesting a diversity update.

A Lot or a Little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Community Reviews

age 17+

Extremely minimalist dramedy brings the realism

While I still have some big problems with this movie, it certainly a brought a level of freshness to me that I thought was all wrung out of the romcom genre...if you can even call it that. If this were a Hollywood project, you know exactly how "two couples who get together for a weekend and and then something happens and the whole dynamic changes" would go down. Instead we get focus on the small details. We don't get the hookup: we get the goofy, middle school-esque flirtation before the hookup. In this way director Joe Swanberg seems to be honing in on the more intimate details of these characters, mainly Kate (Wilde) and Luke (Johnson), whose dynamic throughout is will they/won't they. Now, first off: this movie shows these characters, with actually not that much consequence drinking CONSTANTLY. Like seriously. Besides movies like "Days of Wine and Roses" and "The Lost Weekend" where the focus of the film was alcoholism, I've never seen characters in a movie drink so often! Wilde said that sometimes the drinking was real, sometimes it wasn't. Take that for what you will, but also consider Swanberg had his actors ad-lib the ENTIRE thing!! That's also something I think I've rarely seen. Come to think of it...this movie had a lot of "um's." Actors are paid to say what's in their scripts, and an actual, genuine um is hard to find. So it had an improvised charm to it, and if you didn't know the whole thing wasn't improvised it wouldn't take anything away. It's a unique piece without feeling too experimental, but here's what gets in the way for me: you don't know anything about these people. You have no investment to these two good-looking white alcoholics (let's call it like it is!), Anna Kendrick's Jill likes art, and Ron Livingston's Chris likes poetry. You see their reaction to the romantic entanglements that happen in the movie, but you get 0 background on who they are as characters. Maybe that was a choice, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. But I love the effort put into this very small film, that probably spent most of its budget on brewery equipment and the quartet of famous people starring in it. Oh, and there's Jason Sudeikis, whose appearance can only be rationalized because his wife helped exec-produce it. Don't waste Sudeikis in a tiny part! Overall, I think this is a fine movie for the R-rated crowd to watch. I was rarely bored. It shows you even with no budget and no script you can still make a good movie. That's quality filmmaking, Mr. Swanberg.

This title has:

Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking

Movie Details

Our Editors Recommend

Themes & Topics

Browse titles with similar subject matter.

  • Cartoon hands high fiving
    See all

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate