Four Brothers Movie Poster Image

Four Brothers

(i)

 

A rowdy, brutal revenge movie -- not for kids.
  • Review Date: December 19, 2005
  • Rated: R
  • Genre: Action/Adventure
  • Release Year: 2005
  • Running Time: 110 minutes

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Vengeance allows all manner of violence.

Violence

Explosions, gunfights, car crashes, bodies falling and breaking.

Sex

Sexual allusions and one woman's sexy outfits.

Language

Lots of action movie language, of all sorts.

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Drinking, smoking, drug use.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that the movie features relentless violence and harsh, action-hero language (repeated uses of "f--k" in jest and malice). The mother's murder is made visible on a convenience store video tape, with cuts to the brothers' horror and grief. Characters smoke cigarettes and marijuana, drink beer and liquor, play rough pickup hockey, and chase down culprits who wear ski masks or otherwise look menacing. The shootouts involve large, automatic weapons (lots of shots fired). One character falls out a window and breaks his leg (the injury is shown in close-up), others are shot to pieces, with very visible blood and mangling.

What's the story?

When their adopted mother (Fionnula Flanagan) is killed, an accidental victim of apparent gang-related activity, her sons grow suspicious. Troublemaker Bobby (Mark Wahlberg); "pretty boy" Angel (Tyrese Gibson); family man Jeremiah (André Benjamin); and sensitive, pot-smoking wannabe rocker Jack (Garrett Hedlund) become intent on finding out the truth.

Is it any good?

QUALITY

FOUR BROTHERS is upfront about what it is: a rowdy, brutal revenge movie. The brothers' mission -- justice? revenge? havoc? -- leads to all kinds of mayhem, which a sympathetic Lt. Green (super smooth Terrence Howard) condones as "self-defense." Four Brothers practices the sort of chilling logic whereby the good guys' outrageousness looks "decent" compared to cruelty committed by the Head Villain, here Victor Sweet (Chiwetel Ejiofor), the most depraved gangster this side of Jeffrey Wright's psycho killer in Shaft. This is how mean he is: when a fearful councilman (Barry Shabaka Henley) stops by Victor's home to report bad news, the host sends him to sit at the kids' table in the corner.

The shoot-outs are gargantuan, the car chases demented, and the snow storms actually rather arty. One car chase is especially ingenious, in its way, as it's not about the spectacular driving, but about blindness amid swirling snow. The brothers drive on, unable to stop. It's a useful metaphor for the film.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about the film's mixed messages about violence: it's bad when "gangs" or thugs use it against citizens, but fine and even celebrated when deployed by the vengeful heroes. How do corrupt law and municipal officials, in league with the central villain, create a sense of pervasive dishonesty? How do women characters appear as stereotypical sexual or maternal figures? How does the film promote the brothers' bonding, at the expense of civil order or even hope for any justice aside from murdering the villains?

Movie details

Theatrical release date:August 12, 2005
DVD release date:December 20, 2005
Cast:Mark Wahlberg, Terrence Howard, Tyrese Gibson
Director:John Singleton
Studio:Paramount Pictures
Genre:Action/Adventure
Run time:110 minutes
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:strong violence, pervasive language and some sexual content

This review of Four Brothers was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

  • A guilty pleasure for adults and older teens.
  • Extremely violent sequel is sexist and dumb.
  • Extremely violent; not for kids.
  • Exciting heist film for teens and their families.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Adult Written bybooqradely April 9, 2008

The soundtrack is good but the movie...

My older children took me to see this movie based on the movie trailers...they thought I would like it. This is a movie that is based on violence and uses violence for revenge. It glorifies illegal behavior. What is even more amazing is that amoral people have their own code of conduct and values and attempt to get us to believe that what they did was right. If they are right then I guess that makes George Bush a saint.
Adult Written bydolphinlover9 April 9, 2008

Great movie but not for kids under 15

Teen, 14 years old Written byJulie3000x April 9, 2008
I liked it it wasnt really that violent. A good movie about family bonds.

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Family Media Agreement