Parents' Guide to Juror #2

Impeccably made by an old master, this uncommonly good courtroom drama is intricately designed and richly performed, and offers nuanced, thought-provoking themes. Based on an original screenplay by Jonathan A. Abrams, Juror #2 recalls many classic courtroom films, but perhaps especially 12 Angry Men, expanding on that story's idea and adding surprising gray areas. Director Clint Eastwood, age 94 at the time of the movie's release, still has the skills to tell a great story in an old-school filmmaking style (the kind inspired by John Ford and other artists of "invisible style"). Eastwood builds suspense without rushing, spending time on things that initially don't seem to matter, such as Justin and Allison at home—moments that underline what's really at stake for Justin. (The actors' performances are so disarmingly naturalistic that it's as if a camera were spying on them in their private moments.)

There are no heroes or villains here, and even the two opposing lawyers—superbly played by Collette and Chris Messina—have a professional relationship. And J.K. Simmons brings extra crackle to the jury room scenes as a streetwise retired detective. The court case itself may not be the most airtight—many real life cases aren't, either—but that's not exactly the point. The point is that issues of right and wrong are often complex, with fuzzy areas in between that can confound the justice system. (Eastwood shows us several images of Lady Justice with her blindfold on.) It's telling, too, that Justin's name sounds a bit like "Justice," and Faith's name is, well, obvious. Neither concept is clearly defined here. The messy events of Juror #2 lead up to an ending that's equally messy—but also deeply thoughtful and unforgettable.