Parents' Guide to Little Women (2018)

Movie PG-13 2018 112 minutes
Little Women (2018) Poster Image

Common Sense Media Review

Sandie Angulo Chen By Sandie Angulo Chen , based on child development research. How do we rate?

age 10+

Well-intentioned Alcott modernization misses the mark.

Parents Need to Know

Why Age 10+?

Any Positive Content?

Parent and Kid Reviews

age 12+

Based on 7 parent reviews

age 12+

Based on 1 kid review

What's the Story?

LITTLE WOMEN is a modernized take on Louisa May Alcott's classic 19th-century novel about the March sisters. In this version, directed by Clare Niederpruem, Jo (Sarah Davenport), Meg (Melanie Stone), Beth (Allie Jennings), and Amy (Elise Jones) are imaginative homeschooled sisters who grow up with a loving mother, Marmee (Lea Thompson), a military father (Bart Johnson) deployed abroad, and a rich, handsome neighbor named Laurie (Lucas Grabeel). As an adult, Jo tries to get her stories published under the tutelage of her writing professor, Freddy (Ian Bohen), and reflects on her idyllic upbringing with her beloved sisters.

Is It Any Good?

Our review:
Parents say ( 7 ):
Kids say ( 1 ):

By transporting the March girls and Marmee to the present day, this earnest modernization loses what's special, even revolutionary, about Alcott's original story and its previous adaptations. When the story takes place during the Civil War, it's obvious how progressive the Marches -- particularly Marmee and Jo -- are, thanks to their transcendentalist, pacifist, abolitionist ideas. In this version, the sisters aren't modern, free thinkers who are challenging the status quo. They don't even seem to live in the real world, considering the shots of Jo in New York City don't include anyone who isn't white, for example. But it's not just the movie's obvious lack of diversity that's off-putting. The idea of Jo not wanting to marry Laurie (or anyone, at first) in order to pursue her love of writing felt shocking in the book's original era but is simply idiosyncratic here.

Marmee's guidance and teaching of the March family's values and philosophies is also seriously downplayed. Thompson is a fine actress, but her Marmee doesn't have nearly as much to say as Susan Sarandon in Gillian Armstrong's lovely 1994 adaptation. Overall, the cast is fine but not particularly memorable. Davenport is so beautiful that Amy's funny line "your one beauty!" falls a bit flat. And Grabeel lacks the charismatic gravitas to play Laurie. Kudos to Niederpruem for attempting a contemporary vision for the March sisters, but the present-day context erases and ignores too much of what was remarkable in Alcott's classic story.

Talk to Your Kids About ...

  • Families can talk about how this take on Little Women compares to Louisa May Alcott's novel. Which do you like better? Why?

  • Did you like the way the story was modernized? Do the book's themes and issues translate to a contemporary setting? What works, and what doesn't?

  • Alcott and her book were considered progressive in outlook, particularly in regards to Jo. Is that clearly conveyed in this version?

  • Which characters are role models? Why? Do they exhibit compassion, empathy, and curiosity?

Movie Details

Did we miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by

Little Women (2018) Poster Image

What to Watch Next

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate