Lovelace
age 18+
Reverent portrait of porn star has nudity, language, more.
- Review Date: August 4, 2013
- Rated: R
- Genre: Drama
- Release Year: 2013
- Running Time: 92 minutes
What parents need to know
Positive role models
Violence
Sex
Language
Consumerism
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Parents Need to Know
Parents need to know that Lovelace is a biopic about Linda Lovelace, star of the infamous 1970s porn movie Deep Throat. There's some female toplessness and plenty of sexual innuendo and sexual suggestion, but not much sex is actually shown for a film about porn. Spousal and sexual abuse are also intense parts of the plot, but the movie manages to keep most of it off screen or suggested, rather than shown. Language isn't frequent but is very strong and includes many sexual terms. And there's plenty of drinking and drug use. The movie is very sympathetic toward its heroine and celebrates her efforts to stand up against a dark and brutal world, but it's still not meant for kids.
User reviews
Parents say
Kids say
What's the story?
After getting an abortion, young Linda Boreman (Amanda Seyfried) moves with her strict parents from New York to Florida in 1970. She tries to live a good life, but then she meets Chuck Traynor (Peter Sarsgaard) at a roller rink. He whisks her away from her stifling curfews, changes her name to "Linda Lovelace," and gets her a part in what will become the most famous porn movie of its time: Deep Throat. Linda's sudden fame becomes a blessing and a curse, and she finds it difficult to get away from the sex business once she's in it. Worse, Chuck turns out to be sexually and emotionally abusive. Years later, Linda writes a tell-all book, hoping her cautionary tale will help others in her situation.
Is it any good?
QUALITY
In LOVELACE, San Francisco-based filmmakers Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman deliver a sympathetic portrayal of Linda Lovelace, asserting her innocence and good intentions. (It's based on her own 1980 biography, Ordeal.) But as far as biopics go, it's not great. It shies away from too much intense material, and it would have felt skimpy if not for the structure invented by screenwriter Andy Bellin. The first half of the movie is the typical rags-to-riches part, and the second half goes back to reveal the horrors going on behind the scenes.
This device has the effect of deepening the story and stripping away the façade. Seyfried is the perfect actress to play Linda; she's both charismatic and sexy but also squeaky clean -- she brings her own layers to the part. The rest of the cast is peopled with excellent character actors, but the real surprise is Sharon Stone as Linda's tormented mother, who realizes that her strictness did nothing to prevent Linda's fate and may, indeed, have contributed to it.
Families can talk about...
- Families can talk about the sex industry. Does Lovelace make it look appealing in any way?
How is sex portrayed in the movie? Is it loving or exploitative? Parents, talk to your teens about your own values regarding sex and relationships.
In the movie, what was Linda's relationship with her parents like? Were they supportive? Caring? How well did they communicate?
- Is Linda a role model? What makes her sympathetic despite the things she says and does?
Was Linda too young to be involved in this world?
Movie details
| Theatrical release date: | August 9, 2013 |
| DVD release date: | November 5, 2013 |
| Cast: | Amanda Seyfried, Peter Sarsgaard, Sharon Stone |
| Directors: | Jeffrey Friedman, Rob Epstein |
| Studio: | Radius TWC |
| Genre: | Drama |
| Run time: | 92 minutes |
| MPAA rating: | R |
| MPAA explanation: | strong sexual content, nudity, language, drug use and some domestic violence |
Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.
About Our Rating System
The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.
Great handpicked alternatives
-
Graphic biopic of artist Frida Kahlo.age 16+ -
Sex, drugs, and glam rock in '70s teen band biopic.age 17+
-
Extremely violent portrait of unrepentant real-life killer.age 17+
For kids who love true stories
Browse more movies
Top advice and articles
What parents and kids say
Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines
Tragic tale done well
At 15, I have no problems with consensual sex being shown in movies or with any type of language, the part that made me uneasy was the spousal abuse, even if it was never shown, and finding out that all the sex scenes happened because of coercion, so that she was basically raped.
Overall, she's a positive role model for managing to escape her abuser, but only kids who are ok and mature enough to watch a very tragic story should watch this.
What other families should know
Great role models
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much consumerism
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Was this review useful?
LOVED IT
I watched this movie with really low expectations, and I ended up really loving it. Throughout the entire film I felt as though I was going through all of the ordeals that Linda went through. I liked the way the movie was structured, so that first all you see is the glamour and then the sparkle is peeled back and you see the pain and abuse that takes place. This again put the viewer in the perspective of Linda. Amanda Seyfried is PERFECT in this role and the rest of the cast is great too. Parents should very careful though. This is a movie about the porn industry, so you can expect it to be mature. This is a must see for 17+!
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much consumerism
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Was this review useful?
Oh why
The pornography is just a reason to destroy the TV
What other families should know
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Was this review useful?
