Paycheck

  • Review Date: May 18, 2004
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Action/Adventure
  • Release Year: 2003
  • Running Time: 110 minutes

Common Sense Media says

This movie just sags, even in the action scenes.
  • Review Date: May 18, 2004
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Action/Adventure
  • Release Year: 2003
  • Running Time: 110 minutes

Age(i)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Quality(i)

 

What parents need to know

Positive role models

Strong female character.

Violence

Action violence, guns, explosions. Characters in peril.

Sex

Mild sexual situations.

Language

Some strong language.

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Drinking and smoking.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this movie has extended action violence with guns, chases, kickboxing, explosions, and character deaths. Characters use strong language, smoke, and drink, and there are mild sexual situations.

Parents say

Kids say

What's the story?

In PAYCHECK, Ben Affleck plays Michael Jennings, a brilliant engineer. In two months, he takes apart a revolutionary project for its competitor and makes it all but obsolete. Then the client writes him a big check, his friend Shorty (Paul Giamatti) zaps out his memory of the last eight weeks, and Michael is off to make the kind of memories he likes to keep, all of which seems fine to him. When Shorty tells him to think about stopping, Michael says, \"My memories are basically highlights. The stuff you erase doesn't matter.\" Cue evil mogul Rethrick (Aaron Eckhart), who offers Michael a three-year project. Then cut to three years later. Michael's memory is gone, and so is the $90 million he was supposed to be paid. All he has is a manila envelope with a bunch of mundane items -- hairspray, a fortune from a fortune cookie, a pack of cigarettes, a paperclip, a matchbook. He knows it was a message he sent to himself before his memory was wiped. But what does it mean? And will he ever remember his relationship with a beautiful biologist (Uma Thurman)?

Is it any good?

QUALITY
 

Scientists will discover a way to bend the laws of time before anyone remembers that a movie about bending the laws of time has to have some way of handling the problem of determinism versus free will that is if not plausible then at least consistent. The idea (from Blade Runner's Philip K. Dick) of Paycheck is an intriguing one -- a super-smart computer whiz who trades not only his intellect but also his memory for big bucks. Even on one of his good days, this set-up would have been a challenge for director John Woo, whose stylish staging has turned saggy scripts into highly watchable films. But Woo seems to have taken a hit from that memory-eraser.

We can stand it when a thriller requires some suspension of disbelief. But the one thing we cannot forgive in a would-be thriller is boredom, and this movie just sags, even in the action scenes. Without spoiling what little suspense there is, all I can say is that the big "reveal" removes any sense of narrative tension by making the outcome all but inevitable. Even Woo's trademarks, the fluttering birds and the two-gun stand-off, feel perfunctory.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about whether there are memories they would like to or be willing to erase. If you, like Michael, wanted to make sure that someone really knew you, what question would you ask?

Movie details

Theatrical release date:December 25, 2003
DVD release date:May 18, 2004
Cast:Aaron Eckhart, Ben Affleck, Uma Thurman
Director:John Woo
Studio:Paramount Pictures
Genre:Action/Adventure
Run time:110 minutes
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:intense action violence and brief language

This review of Paycheck was written by

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging, great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging, good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging, okay learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Adult Written byjvkajun1 April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age
QUALITY
 

Good for renting

Not a bad movie. Sci-fi Bourne Identity type of movie. Has some philosophical and moral implications. Makes a statement. Fun movie.
Kid, 11 years old April 2, 2009
AGE
14
QUALITY
 

another masterpiece from jhon woo

commonsensemedia what are you thinking this is ine of the best thrillers ever it's exciting and awesome the film's plot interresting exciting and strange another masterpiece from jhon woo
Teen, 13 years old Written byshopgirl April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age
QUALITY
 

Amazing!!! Very witty!

The plot was amazing! It keeps you on your toes, yet it is funny and feel good movie!!!

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Essential Apps Guide