R.L. Stine's Mostly Ghostly: Have You Met My Ghoulfriend?

Name: R.L. Stine's Mostly Ghostly: Have You Met My Ghoulfriend?
Item: R.L. Stine's Mostly Ghostly: Have You Met My Ghoulfriend?
Rating: 2
Author: Renee Schonfeld

Movie review by

Renee Schonfeld, Common Sense Media

R.L. Stine's Mostly Ghostly: Have You Met My Ghoulfriend? Movie Poster Image

Common Sense says

age 9+

(i)

Bland R.L. Stine entry is more silly than spooky.

PG
2014
91 minutes

Save

Rate movie

Watch or buy

Parents say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Kids say

age 6+

Based on 1 review

Get it now

Searching for streaming and purchasing options ...

Common Sense is a nonprofit organization. Your purchase helps us remain independent and ad-free.

Get it now on

Searching for streaming and purchasing options ...

Common Sense is a nonprofit organization. Your purchase helps us remain independent and ad-free.

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

Half-hearted "believe in yourself" message tacked onto the finale.

Positive Role Models & Representations

An ethnically diverse cast of characters. Hero is typically misunderstood, teased, and laughed at; he has a strong enough sense of himself to recover from the incidents. All adult characters are portrayed as clueless, one-dimensional, and laughable.

Violence

Numerous spooky, shadowy scenes take place in a cemetery and haunted house, with eerie music accompanying the visuals. A very ugly, scary, but obviously comic ghoul wreaks havoc on the young heroes, all in the cemetery: howling, hissing, baring his snaggle teeth, opening graves, and zapping them with spells, lightning, and fireballs, An small army of zombie-humans, wielding swords and other edged weapons, chases the heroes. One fight occurs using the zombie weapons and zapping magic; no one is hurt or killed. A ghoul disappears into a fireball. Along with the comically scary events, human characters endure exaggerated mishaps: falls, crashes into furniture and walls, a run-in with an aggressive cat, and so on.

Sex

One innocent kiss.

Language

Some name-calling: "doofus," "brat," "goof-boy," "freak," "nerd." A character notes, "I hope nobody looks up my shorts." A boy intentionally and loudly farts on another boy's clothes.

Consumerism

This is the second original DVD entry in the R.L. Stine Mostly Ghostly franchise. Stine also creates the Goosebumps brand.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that R.L. Stine's Mostly Ghostly: Have You Met My Ghoulfriend? is based on R.L. Stine's 2004 book of the same name from his Mostly Ghostly series. The film is a follow-up to 2008's Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out? The basic concept -- an 11-year-old boy tries to help a brother-sister ghost team find their missing parents -- is the same, but, because of the time elapsed between the two films, there's a new set of actors in the primary roles. Though the movie is promoted as a "spooky," "scary" adventure, only the youngest or most sensitive kids who have a hard time distinguishing between fictional and real violence will actually be frightened by anything that transpires. The villain, a comically grotesque ghoul with sharp teeth and a hissing, menacing cackle, wields his magic (lightning, zaps, fire, and threats) in such an exaggerated way that it's more silly than scary. Dark spooky music follows the heroes into a cemetery and a haunted house; a band of zombies chases them with sharp-edged weapons. The misfit protagonist is teased, bullied, and occasionally subjected to pratfalls and pranks. Adults are all abysmally ineffectual and foolish.

User Reviews

Parents say
Kids say

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

Kid, 8 years old June 21, 2015

age 6+

Stupid,dumb,cheesy,terrible movie for babies.

My rating:PG action.

Report this review

What's the story?

Once again, in R.L. STINE'S MOSTLY GHOSTLY: HAVE YOU MET MY GHOULFRIEND?, Phears (Charlie Hewson) -- a ghoul trapped in a cemetery, whose goal is total power over all things living and dead -- sets out to find the two ghost children who can help him escape and reach that goal. And once again, Max Doyle (Ryan Ochoa), age 11, the current holder of a magic ring that protects ghost children Tara and Nicky Roland, is called upon to save the day. Max has a giant schoolboy crush on beautiful and popular Cammy (Bella Thorne), and he has a lot to lose, particularly if Tara and Nicky don't stop embarrassing him with their unseen-by-others presence. Phears raises a former Moscow circus performer from her grave to inhabit Max's body, retrieve the ring, and catch the Roland kids. It's all happening as Max plans for a first date with Cammy, must pass a tough physical test at school, and is dealing with his always-tormenting big brother. Finally, time is of the essence; all things must be resolved before the rapidly approaching Halloween holiday.

Is it any good?

Other than a few cackles and zaps, this movie is way too silly to be scary, so it never delivers on its essential promise. However, if audiences can ignore the cheesy special effects, stereotypical bullies and teens, a villain who restates his evil purpose time and time again for the benefit of anyone who can't hold a thought for five minutes or more, and amateurish, exaggerated performances (particularly by the adult members of the cast), there's some fun to be had here. Because the hero is "inhabited" by a formerly dead circus performer, some of the acrobatics and tumbling feats will elicit laughter. And invisible-to-all-but-one-person ghosts popping up in scenes to wreak havoc on the leading character's life is a tried-and-true formula for humor. But don't expect logic, motivated behavior, solid characters, or an original story to spoil the filmmakers' desire to produce a cheap and easy sequel in an already popular franchise.

Talk to your kids about ...

Families can talk about the difference between silly-scary, creepy-scary, and frightening-scary. Into which of these categories would you place this movie? Why?
In this film, as in many others, many middle school and high school kids are portrayed as bullies, teases, and, generally, mean-spirited people. Is this true to your experience? Why do you think filmmakers fall back on this concept to provide conflict in a story?
Discuss the teachers and parents in this movie. Are these people like most of the adults in your life? What do you think the filmmakers are hoping to achieve by characterizing adults in this manner?