All parent member reviews for The Bourne Legacy

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

Parents say

(out of 7 reviews)
AGE
15
QUALITY
 
Review this title!
Parent of a 13 year old Written byLynnoalive August 11, 2012
AGE
18
QUALITY
 

This should be rated R

I'm all for an action-packed thriller, but there are several scenes in this movie which were quite disturbing. It wasn't just that there was deadly violence. In the wake of the recent mass murders, this type of emotionally disturbing violence is not appropriate for chilldren. This movie should have been rated R. I took my near 14 year old son, so clung to me at one or two points in the movie. We loved the original trilogy, but this movie was not at all like those. We were left feeling empty and a bit depressed after it.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Adult Written byjoshua martinez January 13, 2013
AGE
14
QUALITY
 

14 and up.

this action movie The Bourne Legacy stars Jeremy Renner is a good movie based on the other bourne films this is the fourth installment instead of the other actor Matt Damon being in it which he is in the other bourne films this one will surely not disappoint you this action movie is only for your older teens and parents you need to know that The Bourne Legacy has some intense violence such as intense crashes and explosions, and plenty of fight scenes Cross takes out his opponents with handguns, rifles, and often his fists, and some scenes include unpleasant images as he brutalizes people with his bare hands. Necks are snapped, and faces are bashed in there's also some mild language used and some social drinking.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Parent of a 10 and 13 year old Written byMayL August 13, 2012
AGE
15
QUALITY
 

A Great Spinoff But Not for Young Teens

I really liked this movie--I thought it was more plot and character focused than the Matt Damon Bourne movies, which I really liked as well. While this movie is less violent than its predecessors, there is still a number of broken necks, pools of blood, and dead bodies, although most of them die in a less messy way than in the Damon movies. I was surprised at the PG-13 rating, as I do not think it's appropriate for children under 15.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Parent Written byAvis Dijon October 4, 2013
AGE
18
QUALITY
 

Wait until they are at least 15

Two parents (different families) took several 13 and 14 year olds to see this. Too violent. A massacre in a large laboratory goes on and on and on. Two people try to force a woman to shoot herself in the head. Both of us (parents) were shaking, it was too much. At least one kid in the group said she was glad we left. The others? Who knows? It's not cool to be scared.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Parent Written byShivom Oza August 25, 2012
AGE
12
QUALITY
 

Action Packed With Little Substance - Shivom Oza

With a new protagonist in Jeremy Renner, this is the fourth film in the Bourne film franchise. There’s a lot of action on display here. Sadly, not much substance! The film takes place during the same time as the climax of the third Bourne film, ‘The Bourne Ultimatum’. Jason Bourne’s (Matt Damon) public exposure at the end of that film had its repercussions. This action sparked an outrage that threatened to burn down years of research and development into building of efficient spies and warriors. Following Jason Bourne’s dismemberment of Operation Blackbriar, the CIA tries to do away with their other black ops programs as well, which also includes the execution of their field agents. At the helm of this termination operation is ret. Colonel Eric Byer, the director of a black-line agency, NRAG (National Research Assay Group). Byer, responsible for building the various programs, feels threatened as the CIA fails to contain Bourne, and that Treadstone’s fall will expose the close working relationship between two of his chief medical directors. Hence, he has to sacrifice Outcome. Contrary to CIA’s Treadstone, Outcome agents have been developed and trained by the Department of Defense. Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner) is one of six agents in the Outcome. Cross escapes from being executed and, with the help of an Outcome scientist Dr. Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz), sets out to expose the crimes of his superiors. There are flaws in the plot of every action film. However, the plot itself should be engaging enough for the viewers to ignore the plot holes. There is no real ‘antagonist’ in the film. Edward Norton’s character would qualify as one, but then his character isn’t menacing enough. The film, despite having multiple side-tracks, fails to substantiate a basic premise. During the major part of the first half, the film shuffles between several places such as Chicago, Moscow, Pakistan, and Seoul etc. There is a glimmer of hope just before the mid-way mark, when Dr. Marta Shearing is attacked by assassins pretending to be investigators, as a part of the clearing-up operation by the CIA. One does feel that the battle-lines have been drawn. However, nothing really happens henceforth. Just a whole lot of action! The performances by the cast are terrific. Usually, you do find mainstream popular actors sleepwalking through ‘espionage’ films but there’s serious talent on display here. Jeremy Renner of ‘The Avengers’ fame impresses and how! He is intimidating while doing action and subversive while doing drama notwithstanding the marvelous screen presence. One does miss Matt Damon in a Bourne film, but Jeremy is a worthy replacement. Despite the intense looks and the brooding eyes, the actor has got the swagger to pull off an engaging performance. Academy-award-winning actress Rachel Weisz too, is spot-on with her acting. Her character was not very well written but Rachel does do justice even with the limited opportunity. Edward Norton is just brilliant. No matter what film he does, he has this amazing ability to look and sound convincing for any character that he portrays. His ‘antagonist’ act could have been more menacing but that would be the shortcoming of the writers and not the actor. Stupendous line-up! With such brilliant performances, one wonders why the film went haywire. It’s the lackluster writing that lets the film down. No matter how many breathtaking action sequences you fill in a film, you do need a basic and understandable plot to make it work. Writers Tony Gilroy and Dan Gilroy fail to retain the soul of the previous Bourne films. Director Tony Gilroy has packed the film with picturesque locations, mind-blowing action and superlative performances, but he could have done better with a well-defined story line. Watch it for the amazing performances by the cast (Jeremy Renner, Rachel Weisz and Edward Norton) and the exceptional visuals (action and cinematography)! Nothing much else on offer here! Shivom Oza
What other families should know
Great messages
Too much violence
Too much consumerism
Parent Written byDogs1995 August 15, 2012
AGE
14
QUALITY
 

Swearin and violence

Action packed fun
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing