The Hunchback of Notre Dame II

  • Review Date: June 1, 2005
  • Rated: G
  • Genre: Family and Kids
  • Release Year: 2002
  • Running Time: 68 minutes

Common Sense Media says

Weak sequel, with a bit of the original's charms.
  • Review Date: June 1, 2005
  • Rated: G
  • Genre: Family and Kids
  • Release Year: 2002
  • Running Time: 68 minutes





What parents need to know

Positive messages
Not applicable
Violence & scariness

There is a scary scene involving the kidnapping of a child.

Sexy stuff
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Not applicable

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that the original Disney take on Hunchback of Notre Dame had certain charms, not the least of which were the lovely songs, and more specifically, Tom Hulce's singing of them. This direct-to-video sequel has Mr. Hulce's singing, but sadly lackluster songs. The story is rather heavy-handed, but the lesson, about looking beyond the surface for the real value of things and people, is a good one. Although it's far weaker than the original, fans will enjoy reuniting with the characters, and will find some entertaining moments.

Parents say

Kids say

What's the story?

THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME II involves the Festival d'Amour, when Parisians gather at Notre Dame and proclaim their love for each other by shouting it to the rooftops. Poor Quasimodo has no one to shout about until he meets Madellaine, who is part of a traveling circus. The evil circus manager, Sarouche, forces Madellaine to steal from circus attendees, and he has his sights on one of Quasi's bells, one that is especially necessary for the big love festival. The bell is plain on the outside, but inside is encrusted with jewels. As Quasi tells Madellaine "It's more beautiful on the inside." (Get it? Get it?) Will Madellaine overcome her aversion to Quasi's looks? Can Quasi look past her thieving ways to see who she really is? Will the evil Sarouche be stopped?

Is it any good?


There's a reason some films go straight to video. The characters, settings, and situations are the same, but something is missing. In this sequel, the biggest shortcoming is the quality of the music. The songs are weak imitations of those in the original film. Luckily, there aren't many of them.

If you've ever seen a Disney film, you probably know how this one turns out, but there are some pleasures to be had on the way to the end of this one. Quasi's gargoyle friends provide comic relief, and the animated Paris is lovely. It's predictable and a bit ham-fisted in getting its message across, but the underlying lesson, of looking for the truth beneath the surface, is a good one for everyone to be reminded of from time to time.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about judging people by their appearance. What problems does that lead to?

  • How does this movie compare to the original? Which do you like better? Why?

Movie details

DVD release date:March 19, 2002
Cast:Demi Moore, Jason Alexander, Jennifer Love Hewitt
Director:Bradley Raymond
Studio:Walt Disney Pictures
Genre:Family and Kids
Topics:Book characters, Friendship, Misfits and underdogs, Music and sing-along
Run time:68 minutes
MPAA rating:G

This review of The Hunchback of Notre Dame II was written by

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Teen, 13 years old Written byHotaru Chan January 14, 2011

Not nearly as good as the first

Sequels aren't usually as good as the first, and this one's no exception. The story isn't as gripping, the new characters are kind of annoying, the songs aren't very good, even the animation isn't as good as the first. Watch it if you really loved the first, but just don't expect anything great.
Adult Written bybethlthomson April 9, 2008
AGENot rated for age

i cried!

this is a sweet movie to see with kids.
Adult Written byDominicboo1 December 12, 2014

Very bad sequel

This one does have less violence than the original,b ut it's also much more poorly done. Not the least of which is a very annoying villain named "Sarousch" that says "I could kiss me, but then I'd fall in love". Two more annoying new characters are Zephyr, Esmeralda and PHeobus's son that just feels so out of place. Of course, I can't forget lovely Madeleine....she's a wonderful role model for your kids. That is of course if you like the idea of your kids calling themselves stupid and having no self-esteem and being completly pathetic and working for a villain...Quasimodo is his usual good self, but that doesn't amount to much when there's nothing new for kids to take from this movie that's worth it. Besides did Quasimodo need a girlfriend? Isn't having real human friends and the ability to go outside all he wanted in the first movie? Oh well Disney doesn't care, so why should I?


Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Common Sense Kids Action