The Incredible Adventure of Jojo (and His Annoying Little Sister Avila)

Movie review by
Brian Costello, Common Sense Media
The Incredible Adventure of Jojo (and His Annoying Little Sister Avila) Movie Poster Image
Awful adventure has intense peril and potty humor.
  • PG
  • 2014
  • 86 minutes

Parents say

age 6+
Based on 3 reviews

Kids say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

From the movie's opening disclaimer warning that "This is not a film for overprotective parents" to the content from beginning to end, the message bubbling just underneath the surface of this movie is that someone must be some kind of humorless PC worry-wart not to find humor or entertainment value in kids urinating on adults, kids and adults tasting baby feces, a young boy feeding his baby sister worms to eat, close-ups of an infant girl eating a snail, a young boy and an infant girl nearly getting killed by sitting on wolf traps, said young boy and infant getting chased by wolves, and falling backwards onto a branch and nearly falling into water below. 

Positive Role Models & Representations

A hobo who has been urinated on by a young boy and gets a face full of baby feces wants everyone to know, "I am not a toilet." Jojo feeds his infant sister worms. The narrator of the film informs the audience that Jojo's "hands were only good for holding onto his wiener and pissing on bugs and critters." Jojo's grandmother is shown to be an independent rural woman because she shoots a rifle at men who try to dump their old couches in the ditch on her property and because she gave Jojo, a young boy, a pocketknife. 

Violence

Intense peril. An infant somehow ends up on a wolf trap on the verge of getting trapped in its jaws. Same for a young boy. These kids are chased by wolves, nearly fall into water from a high-enough branch. Before this, they get into a car accident in which they fall into a ditch and their mother is presumed dead. A grandmother fires a rifle at two guys trying to dump a couch in a ditch on her property. Kids are chased by an angry homeless man, angry because he was urinated on and got baby feces on his face. This homeless man fights wolves. He also gets hit in the groin area. 

Sex
Language

A young boy uses words like "pissing," sucks," "Jesus." 

Consumerism

Skittles featured prominently in one scene. 

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that The Adventure of Jojo (And His Little Sister Avila) is a 2014 movie about a boy who must take care of his infant sister after a car accident and get them back to their grandmother's house. The opening disclaimer reads, "This is not a film for overprotective parents." That opening disclaimer sets the tone for the movie, and it's a tone that seems determined to troll said "overprotective parents." In other words, you the viewer must be some kind of hyper-sensitive PC-fuddy duddy not to find humor in scenes in which: a young boy and an infant somehow end up on top of a wolf trap and nearly get trapped, getting chased by wolves, nearly drowning, a little boy fond of "pissing on bugs and critters" urinating on adults, a young boy feeding his baby sister worms, the baby sister eating a snail off the ground (shell and all, even if she does spit out the shell a bit later), and tasting and getting hit by baby feces. A "hobo," who gets hit with little-boy urine and little-baby feces, is a human punchline (he doesn't have a home and is therefore not very bright) and yells punchlines like, "I am not a toilet!" A young boy uses words like "pissing," sucks," "Jesus." Also, for some reason, guys who look like they might be in a mafia movie take someone out of their trunk in a garbage bag, hit him a few times with baseball bats, then throw him into the river. Perhaps this would all be bearable for some if the acting wasn't cringe-worthy and the story was more concerned with story rather than shock value. Also, irony of ironies, for all the movie's lamenting of the days when kids ran wild and had more freedom, if the mother and kids in the car accident had not been wearing their seatbelts in the "real world," they would have been gravely injured, if not killed. 

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Parent of a 6 and 9 year old Written byAngiedork19 July 13, 2018

Very cute movie unless you are an overprotective parent.

Very cute, I don't see too much wrong with it. My girls, age 6 and 9, loved it as well. I had to explain to my 6 year old what a weiner was but it is the f... Continue reading

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

What's the story?

In THE INCREDIBLE ADVENTURE OF JOJO (AND HIS ANNOYING LITTLE SISTER AVILA) JoJo goes to visit his grandmother out in the country with his mother and baby sister. His grandmother gives him a pocketknife as a gift. On the drive home, the mother loses control of the vehicle and crashes in a ditch. The mother is unconscious and presumed dead. With his pocketknife, JoJo cuts his seatbelt and gets out of the car with Avila. Carrying Avila and taking what he believes to be the necessary supplies for survival, young JoJo tries to go back to his grandmother's house to alert her of the accident. This adventure leads JoJo and Avila into near-deaths involving sitting on wolf traps, pursuit by an irate "hobo" who JoJo urinated on, pursuit by wolves, and near-drowning. As the grandmother begins to worry, a search party forms, but it's up to JoJo to survive the forest's many dangers and return himself and his infant sister to safety. 

Is it any good?

This movie may have had good intentions but it fails on every level. It's easy to understand why someone might want to make a movie like this. The Adventure of Jojo (And His Little Sister Avila) seems to be pining for the carefree childhoods of the '70s and '80s, of helmet-less BMX and skateboard rides, road trips without seatbelts in the proverbial "way, way back" of smoke-filled station wagons, and going through life without a (gasp) smartphone or even a cell phone to check in every two hours. It's easy to see how some might think the parents of today are "overprotective" and that the problem, like everything in society, is a product of that old chestnut, "political correctness."

The movie feels like it's trying to "troll" so-called "overprotective parents," and that if you dislike this movie, well, you must be some kind of hyper-sensitive "snowflake" who doesn't want anything in the world to ever be offensive to anyone ever. However, it's possible not to enjoy scenes of little kids urinating on "hobos" and "bugs and critters," scenes of little kids and adults tasting or getting hit by baby feces, of an infant girl and little boy somehow ending up seated on opened wolf traps on the verge of springing and killing them, of a little boy holding his infant sister upside down by the ankles in order to retrieve a pocketknife that fell out of reach, without being "too uptight" to see the clear and obvious entertainment value. No, it's not the fault of "overprotective parents" that this movie is so awful. Incredibly bad acting, lousy production values, and a storyline more interested in shock value than a coherent storyline are the reasons. 

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about The Adventure of Jojo (And His Little Sister Avila)'s intention. What is its purpose? Is it successful?

  • How does this movie use "shock value" to attempt to entertain? How might these scenes be viewed as reactions to the "overprotective parents" the film's opening disclaimer says is not for them? 

  • How does the movie attempt to satirize or perhaps even mock contemporary family realities of car seats, bike helmets, and safety? Is it effective?

  • How does the movie present the homeless? Is it a fair portrayal? Why or why not?

Movie details

Themes & Topics

Browse titles with similar subject matter.

For kids who love adventure

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate