The Pacific

Movie review by Will Wade, Common Sense Media
The Pacific Poster Image

Common Sense says

age 16+

Intense drama for older teens about less-known side of WWII.

NR 2010 400 minutes

Parents say

age 16+

Based on 18 reviews

Kids say

age 14+

Based on 11 reviews

Did we miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by suggesting a diversity update.

A Lot or a Little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Community Reviews

age 14+

Good for a certain type of child

This series is an accurate depiction of the war in the pacific theater, to obviously it's quite violent. This series is great for children who can handle such, or who have previously watched movies like hacksaw ridge, band of brothers, or saving private ryan.
age 17+

Powerful WWII drama is much better, much more brutal than Band of Brothers.

THE PACIFIC is an intense and powerful depiction of the grueling Pacific Theater of Operations during WWII. The miniseries is based on the memoirs of several soldiers who served and follows the (mostly separate) stories of U.S. Marines Robert Leckie, Eugene Sledge, and John Basilone through their service. I have watched the entire show three times and it keeps getting better. War violence is intensely and graphically portrayed, with all the blood, severed limbs, and exposed bowels you would expect from an accurate portrayal of 20th-century warfare—plus some grisly surprises (such as a Marine casually tossing pebbles into the open skull of a Japanese corpse, with bloody rainwater splashing out with each hit—a gruesome spectacle that is actually described in Sledge's memoir). The combat scenes are loud and frenetic, thus capturing (as well as any film can) the confusion and terror of war. None of the violence is glamorized at all, but rather it is portrayed as terrifying, fast, and brutal. Language includes frequent use of f*ck and every other lesser profanity (no uses of c*nt as far as I have detected). There is some sexuality and some nudity (breasts, buttocks, and one non-sexual instance of male genitalia). Because it is often compared to BAND OF BROTHERS, I will say that THE PACIFIC has WAY more gore, profanity, and nudity, and is overall WAY more personal and intense. The show gives the clear message that no one leaves war without being seriously damaged, and it gives the impression in the end that the ones who live may be more damaged than those who fall. Soldiers struggle to hold onto their humanity, and become increasingly more brutal toward the enemy. The series really focuses on how the characters gradually become more haunted and traumatized by their experiences, and both their immediate horror and their lasting trauma are palpable. It’s a heavy downer, and I think this is a major reason why so many people prefer the more uplifting BAND OF BROTHERS. THE PACIFIC is less about the bonds formed among soldiers and more about the trauma of the individual. It is, therefore, both more difficult and more powerful than BAND OF BROTHERS. I highly recommend THE PACIFIC over BAND OF BROTHERS because it offers a much deeper and more powerful look into the individual lives of the men who fought and died for America in WWII. Also, I strongly recommend reading Leckie's memoir "Helmet for My Pillow" and Sledge's "With the Old Breed at Peleliu and Okinawa." Both are haunting and very personal memoirs that help to flesh out the stories of the marines even more.

This title has:

Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing

Movie Details

Our Editors Recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate