The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 Movie Poster Image

The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3



Remake of '70s thriller is riveting but violent and intense.
Popular with kidsParents recommend
  • Review Date: June 10, 2009
  • Rated: R
  • Genre: Action/Adventure
  • Release Year: 2009
  • Running Time: 106 minutes

What parents need to know

Positive messages

A man and his crew hijack a subway train for money and kill anyone who gets in the way. But another man tries to erase a wrongdoing by stepping up to the plate to help, and strangers aid each other in a time of crisis.


Lots of very realistic threats and gunfire, with gory results. People are shot point-blank, their blood spattering everywhere.


A young woman flashes her bra to her boyfriend via Webcam.


Lots of strong language throughout, including very frequent use of "f--k," as well as "s--t," "ass," "hell," "damn," "goddamn," "oh my God," and more.

Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Not applicable

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this action-packed remake of the gritty, same-named 1970s thriller is intense and violent and not meant for young kids. The fast-paced story is accompanied by heaping doses of realistic, bloody (expect lots of gunplay ... and resulting gore spatters) and profanity (including lots of "s--t"s and "f--k"s). But on the up side, there's not much in the way of sex, product placement, or substance use/abuse.

What's the story?

Subway dispatcher Walter Garber's (Denzel Washington) day starts mundanely enough, with complaints about non-working switches and workplace pranks. But events take a turn at 2:13 p.m., when he fields a call from Ryder (John Travolta), an ex-con who's hijacked a train and is demanding $10 million for the release of its passengers -- and he threatens to shoot one of them for every minute the loot fails to show. Still reeling from being demoted to the dispatch desk after being accused of taking bribes, Garber senses a chance to redeem his name. But the stakes are high and the odds ugly.

Is it any good?


THE TAKING OF PELHAM 1 2 3 is successful, fancy filmmaking: It's efficient, gripping, and hits the right marks. But in this update of the 1974 classic, New York is no longer gritty. Busy, yes; rat-infested, yes. Tawdry like New York in the 1970s? No. That's not to say that a train hijacking could only happen in old New York. But a crime that takes place in the warren-like bowels of the city seems discordant when set against the slick, finance-driven backdrop depicted here, somewhat diminishing the intensity of this still-gripping thriller.

On the acting side, though there's little shading in his character as it's written, Washington tries hard, managing to add depth to the role. And Travolta turns in a believable performance, but it takes some time for him to establish his villainy. Menacing with his perma-scowl and tattoos, his voice is nevertheless too decent (even while uttering expletives). The rest of the supporting cast -- which includes James Gandolfini as a lame-duck mayor and John Turturro as a hostage negotiator -- is strong, elevating the film's artistry. The breakneck camerawork heightens the drama, but a few more lingering shots would have been nice. Without them, the characters feel like pawns in a glitzy game -- one that's entertaining but not a classic.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about the movie's violence. Does it have more or less impact than the fights and explosions in more fantasy-based movies? How does this movie compare to other thrillers? Is it believable? Does that matter? Parents and teens who've seen the original can also discuss how this one stacks up. Why do so many movies get remade in Hollywood?

Movie details

Theatrical release date:June 12, 2009
DVD release date:November 3, 2009
Cast:Denzel Washington, James Gandolfini, John Travolta
Director:Tony Scott
Studio:Sony Pictures
Run time:106 minutes
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:violence and pervasive language

This review of The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

  • Mature, well-acted thriller mixes violence and politics.
  • Caper movie mixes clichés, brutal violence.
  • Smart heist movie is not for children.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Teen, 13 years old Written byILuvCandy August 7, 2012

action and exciting

I watched this wen i wz younger and i actually really liked it and didnt care about some language and inappropriate scenes! my parents took me and my father literally covered my eyes whenever something happens!
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing
Teen, 14 years old Written byStevie111 March 3, 2012

Intense, violent, and dark

Very intense and profane, but really nothing a teen couldn't handle. It is a very serious movie, though.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing
Adult Written by4Spice June 13, 2010

good movie

good action movie worth watching some violence and some language some F##K words worth watching 12 and over
What other families should know
Too much swearing


Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?