The X-Files: I Want to Believe

Movie review by
James Rocchi, Common Sense Media
The X-Files: I Want to Believe Movie Poster Image
Second X-Files movie is grisly, disappointing.
  • PG-13
  • 2008
  • 104 minutes

Parents say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Kids say

age 14+
Based on 8 reviews

Did this review miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive, diverse representations in books, TV shows, and movies. Want to help us help them? Suggest a diversity update

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

Extensive discussion of proof versus faith; discussions of medical ethics and the desire to prolong life by any means necessary, including stem-cell therapy.

Positive Role Models & Representations

A doctor struggles with the best way to help a terminally ill young boy.


Kidnapping, fighting, and very extensive, gory surgical imagery. Some of the procedures are non-consensual; images include severed limbs and heads (shown on screen), head transplants, organs being handed around, transfusions, scars, and more. A car is driven/pushed off the road with malice twice; guns, sticks, and trowels are used as weapons; a supporting character falls to their death, with the implication that they're impaled at the end of their fall. Dogs attack characters; humans are injected with animal tranquilizer against their will. Animals are used in gruesome experiments. A supporting character (an ex-priest) is a convicted pedophile with 37 past victims; discussions of buggery and castration. Several scenes take place in a halfway house for paroled sex offenders.


A couple snuggles in bed; some kissing; mild sexual innuendo as part of a long-term relationship.


"Ass," "balls," and "s--t" are used sporadically.



Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

A supporting character smokes, with grave health ramifications as part of the plot.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that the second X-Files movie (which is a stand-alone story, not a continuation of the series' core conspiracy) is more likely to appeal to adult fans of the '90s TV show than to teens, though some may still be interested. Be warned that it's pretty grisly (more so than the earlier movie): It includes graphic, horrifyingly detailed depictions of "scientific" medical procedures on unwilling victims, including lengthy, Silence of the Lambs-esque moments of a young woman in captivity awaiting her fate and images of severed limbs, ghastly stitches, copious amounts of blood, and more. Also, a psychic helping the FBI investigate the abduction of an agent is a convicted pedophile ex-priest with 37 victims; the character's crimes are in the past -- and deeply regretted -- but still discussed at great length.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written byajgy April 9, 2008

15 Plus

Yellow For 16 Plus Strong Violence,Sex Matriel,Language,Drinking,Gore,and Strong Content!!!!!
Adult Written bydiscardedheart April 9, 2008

love, just love.

as a fan of many years.. i found this movie to be a great extension to the series. seeing agents scully and mulder together again was nearly as good as a huge s... Continue reading
Teen, 15 years old Written byLucan1010 August 23, 2015

Movie is better than expected and is less violent then you think.

Violence: Constant peril/tension, people are harvested for organs against there will (but this isn't seen on screen in "length" as common sense s... Continue reading
Teen, 17 years old Written byThe Mighty Neb April 24, 2021

What's the story?

Picking up after the finale of The X-Files TV series, THE X-FILES: I WANT TO BELIEVE begins with the kidnapping of a female FBI agent. An FBI team searches desperately for clues under the direction of a psychic, Father Joseph Crissman (Billy Connolly), who guides the team to a severed male arm buried in deep snow. A convicted pedophile, Crissman is hardly the most reliable source, so the FBI reaches out to ex-agent Dr. Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson) and asks her to locate former partner Fox Mulder (David Duchovny), who specialized in cases involving unexplainable phenomena. Soon Mulder and Scully are back up to their necks in conspiracy, psychic visions, questions of faith and redemption, and bloody murder.

Is it any good?

Coming to theaters six years after the end of the TV series and a decade after the last big-screen outing for The X-Files, it's a little hard to see the point of X-Files: I Want to Believe. The film doesn't really intersect with the aliens-and-shadowy-humans conspiracy mythos explored throughout the series and in the prior film; instead, it's a stand-alone story that feels a little lonesome, as if no one could think of any reason beside the profit motive for returning to the franchise. Fans will no doubt be disappointed by the film's avoidance of director (and series creator) Chris Carter's squirrely rat's nest of entanglements and secrets that was the hallmark of the series; non-fans probably won't care in the first place.

Worse, The X-Files: I Want to Believe squanders both Duchovny and Anderson. Duchovny slouches back into action-hero mode, armed with his faith in the unknown and avid desire to understand the incomprehensible; Anderson gets to agonize over the questions surrounding a young child with a terminal illness. Both of the actors are capable of more than this, and it feels like they know it. The subplot involving Connolly's psychic pedophile priest comes out of nowhere and stays there, never really engaging the audience and wasting the charisma and charm that stand-up-comic-turned-actor Connolly has brought to prior roles in films like Mrs. Brown and Fido. Moody, murky, and graphically grisly, The X-Files: I Want to Believe seems like a film made solely to make money. But will it even be able to find box-office dollars years after the series' original pop-culture cachet has come and gone?

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about the phenomenon of The X-Files TV show and this film's appearance in theaters six years after it ended (and 10 years after the first movie). Is there an artistic reason for these characters to return, or just the hope of financial reward for the studio?

  • Families can also discuss many of the questions raised in the film: What's the difference between faith and belief? When does the attempt to extend human life in the face of illness cross moral and ethical lines? Can a criminal earn forgiveness for horrible crimes?

  • What is the point of making a sequel? Are sequels are better than the original? If so, name some examples.

Movie details

Our editors recommend

For kids who love science fiction

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

Streaming options powered by JustWatch

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality.

Learn how we rate