We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks

Movie review by
Sandie Angulo Chen, Common Sense Media
We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks Movie Poster Image
Documentary tackles complex issues of truth and safety.
  • R
  • 2013
  • 130 minutes

Parents say

age 18+
Based on 1 review

Kids say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Did this review miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive, diverse representations in books, TV shows, and movies. Want to help us help them? Suggest a diversity update

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

Ultimately the documentary doesn't judge any of the characters involved in the WikiLeaks controversy, presenting the ideas of both those who firmly believe in the importance of open, unfettered access to information and those who believe there are some things the public shouldn't see -- at least not while it could compromise the safety and diplomacy of nations around the world.

Positive Role Models & Representations

It's difficult to consider anyone depicted in the documentary as a role model. Everyone is deeply flawed, no matter how pure their intentions. Julian Assange believes in "splendide mendax," Horace's term for being "nobly untruthful." Despite Assange's "uncompromising" belief in complete transparency and exposing secrets, he apparently has no problem in keeping his own secrets and spreading untruths when it suits him. Bradley Manning is a self-described "broken soul" who wants people to know the true cost of war, but by revealing confidential national secrets, he's clearly breaking the law. And then there's Adrian Lamo, who turned Bradley Manning in and seems regretful but is portrayed as a fame hound.


The "Collateral Murder" footage that Bradley Manning is accused of leaking to WikiLeaks shows American forces killing civilians they mistook for enemy combatants. The accompanying stills depict bloody, charred, and dismembered bodies. That footage is played again and again, as is video from other coalition forces strikes and documentary footage of the Twin Towers burning on 9/11.


Detailed discussion of Julian Assange's sexual coercion case, including an interview with one of the plaintiffs suing him for refusing to put on a condom and then purposely ripping it. References to an HIV test.


Frequent strong language, especially from Assange. He says things like "f--k," "s--t," "a--hole," "bastards," "goddamn," "Jesus Christ," etc. Some swear words are shown in transcripts of leaked Internet chats and videos.


Coca-Cola, Google, and lots and lots of Apple computers are mentioned or visible.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Adults are shown drinking and dancing in footage of a club outing.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks is an intense survey of one of the most controversial information "leaks" in recent history. Oscar-winning documentarian Alex Gibney tells the story of two men: Australian WikiLeaks founder/visionary/hacker Julian Assange and American soldier/computer whiz Bradley Manning, who is, by all accounts, the whistleblower responsible for leaking thousands of confidential videos and memos to Assange's "anonymous" online dropbox. There's grim violence, particularly in the leaked war footage, that's too disturbing for younger audiences, as well as strong language ("f--k," "a--hole," etc.) and references to sex and sexual coercion. Viewers need to be mature enough to handle the movie's difficult themes and issues and to figure out what they believe about the secrets and lies discussed in the documentary.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written byEmma Goldstein May 25, 2013


“Why are you crying, Alex?” said Ms. Goldstein.

“Jules won’t play with me.” He wiped his nose on his sleeve.

Little Julian banged away on his Fisher-Price typ... Continue reading

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

What's the story?

In WE STEAL SECRETS: THE STORY OF WIKILEAKS, prolific Academy Award-winning documentarian Alex Gibney follows the fascinating and highly mythologized story of the infamous WikiLeaks scandal by alternating the focus between Australian hacker-turned-activist Julian Assange and young, emotionally fragile Army whistleblower Bradley Manning. Gibney explores the motivations behind the WikiLeaks site -- an anonymous, highly secure dropbox for classified documents and information -- and Manning's need to not only share thousands of top-secret military and diplomatic files (including the "Collateral Murder" clip of an American strike that killed civilians) with Assange but also to reveal himself as the leak to another hacker, Adrian Lamo, who eventually turned Manning in (he's now imprisoned). The docu also probes into the secrets that Assange wasn't willing to spill -- like the truth about the sexual coercion case against him in Sweden.

Is it any good?

A documentary about the highly revered (or reviled, depending on your stance) Assange and Manning is clearly in the very capable Gibney's wheelhouse as a nonfiction storyteller. Gibney has tackled incredibly tough subjects in his career as a filmmaker -- the war in Afghanistan (Taxi to the Dark Side), corrupt super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff (Casino Jack and the United States of Money), and the child-abuse scandals in the Catholic Church (Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God). Here, he manages to present a balanced view of all the people involved in the scandal and finds articulate international hackers and transparency journalists who fervently believe in WikiLeaks' mission to give people access to the truth -- however horrifying those truths might be to the general public.

Although Assange's ardent supporters may think Gibney has villainized the Aussie, the provocateur does that all by himself by not allowing the filmmaker to interview him directly (although there's more than enough additional footage of Assange to fill the documentary). Gibney spends more than two hours giving audiences a look at the timeline and the events of the story -- and also pulling back the curtain on the many myths surrounding Assange (particularly the idea that the two Swedish women who filed a sexual coercion case against him were somehow tied to the CIA or other international forces, a claim that Gibney found no evidence to support). No one emerges as a pure hero or bad guy, but, at the very least, Manning, who's the one in prison, comes off as highly sensitive and in some ways just a young broken soul desperate to make people understand the ugly truth of war and national security.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about whether We Steal Secrets portrays its subjects objectively or with any bias. Do documentaries have to be subjective? 

  • How does the filmmaker debunk some of the myths surrounding the WikiLeaks story? What did you learn about the people involved?

  • Discuss the idea of Mendax, Assange's old hacker name, and how it applies to him now. Do you think he's "nobly untruthful"? Is he portrayed as a villain, a visionary, or a bit of both?

  • Do you think the potential cost of exposing secrets (imprisonment, retaliation) is worth it if the global citizenry can know what's really going on in a war or behind the scenes in corporations, the government, or international relations?

  • Does We Steal Secrets make you respect hackers? Why or why not? What do you think of Adrian Lamo? Do you think he trapped Manning by befriending him, or do you believe he was in what he called a "no-win situation"?

Movie details

Our editors recommend

For kids who love true stories

Themes & Topics

Browse titles with similar subject matter.

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

Streaming options powered by JustWatch

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality.

Learn how we rate