A Lot or a Little?
What you will—and won't—find in this movie.
Ultimately the documentary doesn't judge any of the characters involved in the WikiLeaks controversy, presenting the ideas of both those who firmly believe in the importance of open, unfettered access to information and those who believe there are some things the public shouldn't see -- at least not while it could compromise the safety and diplomacy of nations around the world.
Positive Role Models
It's difficult to consider anyone depicted in the documentary as a role model. Everyone is deeply flawed, no matter how pure their intentions. Julian Assange believes in "splendide mendax," Horace's term for being "nobly untruthful." Despite Assange's "uncompromising" belief in complete transparency and exposing secrets, he apparently has no problem in keeping his own secrets and spreading untruths when it suits him. Bradley Manning is a self-described "broken soul" who wants people to know the true cost of war, but by revealing confidential national secrets, he's clearly breaking the law. And then there's Adrian Lamo, who turned Bradley Manning in and seems regretful but is portrayed as a fame hound.
Violence & Scariness
The "Collateral Murder" footage that Bradley Manning is accused of leaking to WikiLeaks shows American forces killing civilians they mistook for enemy combatants. The accompanying stills depict bloody, charred, and dismembered bodies. That footage is played again and again, as is video from other coalition forces strikes and documentary footage of the Twin Towers burning on 9/11.
Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Violence & Scariness in your kid's entertainment guide.Get started
Sex, Romance & Nudity
Detailed discussion of Julian Assange's sexual coercion case, including an interview with one of the plaintiffs suing him for refusing to put on a condom and then purposely ripping it. References to an HIV test.
Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Sex, Romance & Nudity in your kid's entertainment guide.Get started
Frequent strong language, especially from Assange. He says things like "f--k," "s--t," "a--hole," "bastards," "goddamn," "Jesus Christ," etc. Some swear words are shown in transcripts of leaked Internet chats and videos.
Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Language in your kid's entertainment guide.Get started
Products & Purchases
Coca-Cola, Google, and lots and lots of Apple computers are mentioned or visible.
Drinking, Drugs & Smoking
Adults are shown drinking and dancing in footage of a club outing.
Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Drinking, Drugs & Smoking in your kid's entertainment guide.Get started
Parents Need to Know
Parents need to know that We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks is an intense survey of one of the most controversial information "leaks" in recent history. Oscar-winning documentarian Alex Gibney tells the story of two men: Australian WikiLeaks founder/visionary/hacker Julian Assange and American soldier/computer whiz Bradley Manning, who is, by all accounts, the whistleblower responsible for leaking thousands of confidential videos and memos to Assange's "anonymous" online dropbox. There's grim violence, particularly in the leaked war footage, that's too disturbing for younger audiences, as well as strong language ("f--k," "a--hole," etc.) and references to sex and sexual coercion. Viewers need to be mature enough to handle the movie's difficult themes and issues and to figure out what they believe about the secrets and lies discussed in the documentary. To stay in the loop on more movies like this, you can sign up for weekly Family Movie Night emails.
Is It Any Good?
A documentary about the highly revered (or reviled, depending on your stance) Assange and Manning is clearly in the very capable Gibney's wheelhouse as a nonfiction storyteller. Gibney has tackled incredibly tough subjects in his career as a filmmaker -- the war in Afghanistan (Taxi to the Dark Side), corrupt super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff (Casino Jack and the United States of Money), and the child-abuse scandals in the Catholic Church (Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God). Here, he manages to present a balanced view of all the people involved in the scandal and finds articulate international hackers and transparency journalists who fervently believe in WikiLeaks' mission to give people access to the truth -- however horrifying those truths might be to the general public.
Although Assange's ardent supporters may think Gibney has villainized the Aussie, the provocateur does that all by himself by not allowing the filmmaker to interview him directly (although there's more than enough additional footage of Assange to fill the documentary). Gibney spends more than two hours giving audiences a look at the timeline and the events of the story -- and also pulling back the curtain on the many myths surrounding Assange (particularly the idea that the two Swedish women who filed a sexual coercion case against him were somehow tied to the CIA or other international forces, a claim that Gibney found no evidence to support). No one emerges as a pure hero or bad guy, but, at the very least, Manning, who's the one in prison, comes off as highly sensitive and in some ways just a young broken soul desperate to make people understand the ugly truth of war and national security.
Did we miss something on diversity?
Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by suggesting a diversity update.
Suggest an Update
Our Editors Recommend
Movies That Inspire Kids to Change the World
Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.See how we rate