Immortalized

Common Sense Media says

Taxidermy reality contest is bizarre but ultimately boring.

Age(i)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Quality(i)

 

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Contestants are judged objectively on their skill level and artistic interpretation. Talent and skill are rewarded.

Positive role models

The contestants and judges (with the exception of comedian Brian Posehn) all have different approaches to taxidermy and take the art form seriously. Most contestants are highly skilled.

Violence

The taxidermists are working with animals that are already dead. Taxidermy scenes show some exposed animal tissue, skin, etc., but with minimal to no blood.

Sex

Light innuendo includes phrases like "size matters."

Language

Occasional bleeped swearing (as in, "holy s--t!"). Taxidermists also use body-part terms like "scrotum" and "penis."

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Not applicable

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that Immortalized is a reality competition that rewards technical skill and artistry, so contestants and challengers can turn out some pretty impressive -- albeit occasionally bizarre -- stuff. There's very little blood because the taxidermists work with animals that are already dead. But you'll still see some exposed animal tissue, skin, etc. There's also some light sexual innuendo in the form of phrases like "size matters" and words like "scrotum" and "penis," along with some occasional bleeped swearing (as in, "holy s--t!").

User reviews

Parents say

Not yet rated
Review this title!

Kids say

Not yet rated
Review this title!

What's the story?

Each episode of the competitive reality series IMMORTALIZED pits a new challenger against one of four "Immortalizers" (Beth Beverly, Dave House, Page Nethercutt, and Takeshi Yamada -- all expert taxidermists who are respected in the field) and assigns them a project based on a predetermined theme. The winner is then selected by a panel of judges (Smithsonian taxidermist Paul Rhymer, artist Catherine Coan, and comedian Brian Posehn) who decide whether the challenger or the Immortalizer did a better job.

Is it any good?

QUALITY
 

In theory, Immortalized sounds like the stuff reality TV dreams are made of, turning taxidermy into a head-to-head competition that puts a little-understood art form in the spotlight with the corny intensity of, say, Iron Chef America. It sounds weird, just weird enough to work. Only in this case, it totally doesn't  -- in spite of the concept's guilty-pleasure potential.

The main problem is the show's bungled format, which completely saps the series of any drama by devoting a mere five minutes to the actual creation process and breezing through the hours of painstaking work that goes into each display. As a result, the bulk of each episode feels more like filler than compelling television. And even weird subjects deserve more dignity than that.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about reality television's tendency toward the outlandish and bizarre. Does taxidermy make a good topic for a reality competition? Is Immortalized a show a lot of people will want to watch?

  • Why did producers choose to have the taxidermists do most of their work outside of the studio? Would it be possible to film them doing their work in a studio environment? What do you think about the show's format? Does it work for you?

  • What preconceived notions, if any, did you have about taxidermy before watching Immortalized? Did the show change any of your opinions about the "art" of stuffing animals?

TV details

Cast:Brian Posehn
Network:AMC
Genre:Reality TV
Topics:Science and nature, Wild animals
TV rating:TV-PG

This review of Immortalized was written by

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

Write a user reviewThere aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?
Thanks – we appreciate your feedback!

Essential School Tools