Masters of Sex

TV review by
Kari Croop, Common Sense Media
Masters of Sex TV Poster Image
Titillating period drama shows the sexier side of science.

Parents say

age 18+
Based on 2 reviews

Kids say

age 18+
Based on 3 reviews

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this TV show.

Positive Messages

 Sex is viewed as normal, positive, and worthy of study. Female empowerment, infidelity, and racial divides are themes. 

Positive Role Models & Representations

Both Masters and Johnson are committed to their research for scientific reasons. Their professional relationship eventually leads to questionable behavior. 

Violence

Physical fights occasionally break out among characters; blood, bruises, and stitching up visible. Childhood abuse is a theme. 

Sex

The entire show is about sex and sexual response. Occasional explicit sex acts visible. Nudity is frequent (breast, nipples, bottoms). Impotence is a theme.  

Language

Unbleeped swearing includes "f--k" along with colorful sexual slang such as "twat," "hump," and "cum."

Consumerism
Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Drinking (hard liquor) is frequent and often excessive; often leads to negative behaviors. 

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that Masters of Sex examines the life and work of William Masters and Virginia Johnson, a pair of pioneering researchers who studied the physiological aspect of human sexual response in the 1950s and '60s. You'll see plenty of simulated and explicit sex acts and lots of nudity and hear characters frankly discuss dildos, orgasms, and blow jobs (along with some unbleeped swearing). The show also delves into titillating social issues -- including sexism, racism, and the nature of love -- making it about a lot more than sex.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Parent Written byphuong nguyen October 2, 2013

99% masters of sex is for adult only not for kids

master of sex this show is not for children is too much sex and nudity drug use and foul occassional course language it is TV-MA or Rated R Fortoo much sex and... Continue reading
Adult Written byclarence August 4, 2015
Kid, 11 years old November 11, 2013

TV-MA

it was for adults so it should be rated TV-MA.
Teen, 14 years old Written byTheRandomme13 April 8, 2014

Its good but you see bodies

its a really good tv show i mean me personally im 14 and in some of the episodes i was thinking eww and skipped but the plot behind it and figuring out the woma... Continue reading

What's the story?

Based on the lives of pioneering sex researchers William Masters (Michael Sheen) and Virginia Johnson (Lizzy Caplan), MASTERS OF SEX explores the famed duo's controversial sex studies. From observing hundreds of people in the throes of ecstasy in a science lab at Washington University in St. Louis to challenging well-established theories about sex, impotence, and other taboo subjects of the time, the duo faces endless professional and personal challenges as they break ground in the field of human sexuality.  

Is it any good?

For viewers who have never heard of the titular William Masters and the groundbreaking work he did with his then-research assistant (and future wife) Virginia Johnson, Masters of Sex will be a bit of a revelation. The lab equipment alone -- including a Plexiglas dildo with a built-in camera dubbed "Ulysses" -- is downright eye-opening. Still, when you get past the sex and nudity, which can hardly be avoided, you soon realize there's also some thought-provoking substance.

British actor Sheen (perhaps best known for his repeat portrayals of former Prime Minister Tony Blair in the film trilogy The Deal, The Queen, and The Special Relationship) pulls off a credible American accent as well as another great character who, in this case, is both respectable and unlikable. Still, the real charmer here is Caplan, who blends unflappable street smarts with a beguiling charisma that makes Johnson the real standout of the duo.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about the real-life Masters and Johnson and discuss their work in a historical context. What were the 1950s and '60s like for human sexuality, particularly in how publicly it was discussed in social settings and in the media? Has history proven Masters and Johnson's research to be more or less relevant than it was when they initially published their findings?

  • How does sexism play into the duo's on-screen drama and their working relationship? Do women working in science still face the same challenges they did more than 50 years ago?

  • How accurate is Masters of Sex's portrayal of the real-life research pioneers and their work? Is it important for TV shows, movies, and other media to stay true to the facts when bringing the lives of actual people to life on-screen? What are the downsides of taking creative liberties with the truth?

TV details

Themes & Topics

Browse titles with similar subject matter.

For kids who love dramas and biopics

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate