Common Sense Media Review
"History" docu emphasizes doom and gloom over facts.
Parents Need to Know
Why Age 12+?
Any Positive Content?
Where to Watch
Videos and Photos
Nostradamus Effect
What's the Story?
That human beings have long been preoccupied with trying to predict the future and with predictions of apocalypse is a given. NOSTRADAMUS EFFECT looks at a host of predictions about the end of the world, some of which seem eerily prescient. Most of the emphasis is on the show's namesake, Nostradamus, the 16th-century seer whose work has been used to predict all kinds of events -- including ones that haven't happened yet (like earthquakes in New York City).
Is It Any Good?
If you're looking for a way to start teaching your kids the very important task of how to assess credibility, Nostradamus Effect is a fine place to start ... but then you'd have to actually watch it, and that may not be a worthwhile trade-off. Most of the talking heads featured on the show have no academic background, and much of their "proof" is based on segments of sentences in larger works that sound eerily omniscient but are in fact so vague that they could mean all kinds of things. All of which is accompanied by spooky music and effects and ominous pronouncements -- such as that the third Antichrist could be even now among us (never mind that the prophecies the show uses to prove the coming of said Antichrist were supposedly fulfilled 200 and 400 years after they were originally made).
The narration claims that that the show doesn't want to prove or refute the prophecies it examines ... but later talks about seeing if we can find the truth. And the supposed historical facts are often merely conjecture. It's nonsense like that that makes you want to throw things at your TV set.
Talk to Your Kids About ...
Families can talk about whether the evidence here supports the claims being made or whether it falls short. Do you think it's possible to prove these prophecies one way or the other?
How do we figure out if what we're being told is true? People stretch the truth all the time -- are the "facts" presented on TV always verifiable? How can you check such facts?
Could the way the show is edited make it seem as though someone is saying something he or she really isn't? For example, could an expert be giving an example as a prelude to debunking it (with the latter part being left out)?
TV Details
- Premiere date : September 9, 2009
- Network : History
- Genre : Educational
- TV rating :
- Last updated : October 10, 2022
Did we miss something on diversity?
Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by
Suggest an Update
Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.
See how we rate