Survival of the Richest

TV review by
Lucy Maher, Common Sense Media
Survival of the Richest TV Poster Image
Crass, mean-spirited reality show to be avoided.

Parents say

age 2+
Based on 3 reviews

Kids say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this TV show.

Positive Messages

The wealthy belittle their poor counterparts, who then put down the rich contestants. Stereotypes are played up.

Violence
Sex

In later episodes, some of the characters hook up.

Language

Curses are bleeped out.

Consumerism
Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

There is social drinking.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this reality series reinforces stereotypes and is generally in pretty poor taste. It constantly plays up the level of animosity between the two groups of characters: The wealthy ones show zero respect to for poor ones, who, in turn, do little to hide their disgust for their privileged counterparts.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written byaecdoglover April 9, 2008

Kind of Annoying

The rich people are made to be annoying - the poor to be hardworking. VERY sterotypical!
Parent Written byJill Murphy April 9, 2008

social message is pathetic...

...and for the lack of integrity, the show should be OFF!

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

What's the story?

The one-hour reality series SURVIVAL OF THE RICHEST pairs wealthy people with individuals struggling with debt in a race to see who can best work together to remain the last standing after a series of grueling challenges. Hosted by Hal Sparks (Queer as Folk), the series brings together 14 twenty-somethings in a Southern California mansion: Seven of them are trust-fund types with a combined net worth of $3 billion, while the other seven working-class folks have a collective debt of $150,000. Each week, the seven teams (each made up of one rich person and one poor) are given challenges -- such as cleaning out the stalls at a local race track or building a Habitat for Humanity house. The last team standing walks away with $200,000. What's in it for the wealthy contestants? The chance to prove that they can live without their parents' money.

Is it any good?

Frankly, there is nothing redeeming about this series. The contestants struggling with debt are belittled by the wealthy, whose arrogance is on full display. Case in point: During a challenge in which the teams have to wait on families attending a mock medieval party, Nick, heir to a hotel fortune, sneers, "I'm serving chicken to the second-class citizens of Orange County."

In the same episode, Elizabeth, a 23-year-old worth over $1 billion, notes when changing into her work clothes and putting belongings into a locker: "I'm worried about leaving my stuff in here. It probably cost more than these people's houses." What's perhaps the saddest about the show is that the poor contestants are there because they need the money, while it appears to be little more than a comical experiment for their rich counterparts.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about socioeconomic issues and their effect on the way people behave. Why is it important to treat others as you would want to be treated? Does money buy happiness? What's dangerous about making assumptions based on social class?

TV details

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate